SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-230721"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-230721" > Investigating the P...

Investigating the Potential for RGT and ACJ towards deeper insights of Teacher Assessment Practices

Hartell, Eva, 1973- (författare)
KTH,Skolan för teknikvetenskaplig kommunikation och lärande (ECE),Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM),Teknikdidaktik
Isaksson Persson, Helena (författare)
KTH,Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM),Teknikdidaktik
Bartholomew, Scott (författare)
Purdue University
visa fler...
Strimel, Greg (författare)
Purdue University
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Athlone, Ireland : Technology Education Research Group, 2018
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: 2018 PATT36 International Conference. - Athlone, Ireland : Technology Education Research Group. - 9781527225077 - 9781527225084 ; , s. 371-377
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • The evolution of advanced technology systems and the labour market for future engineers and designers are a global matter. In light of this reasoning, a global perspective on technology education becomes even more important. Assessment is key in order to bridge teaching and learning and an international perspective is needed for understanding different assessment practices in technology education. The purpose of this paper is to investigate potential methods of gaining new perspectives and understanding of teacher assessment practices. Adaptive comparative judgement (ACJ) is an assessment method that has been proven to provide valid, reliable, and feasible results for the assessment of open-ended design problems within technology/engineering education in several countries (Hartell & Skogh, 2015; Kimbell, 2012; Power & Seery, 2012; Seery, Canty, & Phelan, 2011; Bartholomew, 2016). ACJ has also been used as an approach to compare teachers’ assessment practices across countries (see e.g. Bartholomew et al, 2017). Reparatory grid theory (RGT) is a method based on George Kelly’s theory of personal constructs (Kelly, 1963). RGT is used to explore informants’ interpretations and views, on certain topics, for example products or other artefacts (Isaksson Persson, 2015), and teachers’ assessments of portfolios in crafts/sloyd and technology education (Björklund, 2008; Lindström, 2001). The results of ACJ for assessment can be represented in a quantitative manner (Pollitt, 2012) and can be complimented with qualitative measures of think aloud protocols and or comments from informants during the judgement sessions (see e.g. Hartell & Skogh, 2015).This paper will explore the potential for, and implications of, combining RGT and ACJ outputs a richer understanding of teachers’ assessment values when assessing open-ended students design portfolios and products by deploying RGT on think-aloud protocols and comments provided by judges during ACJ.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Adaptive comparative judgement
comparative judgement
reparatory grid theory
assessment
technology education
engineering education
STEM education
Technology and Learning
Teknik och lärande
Teknikvetenskapens lärande och kommunikation
Education and Communication in the Technological Sciences

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
kon (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy