SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-231308"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-231308" > Design values, pref...

Design values, preferences, similarities and differences across three global regions

Bartholomew, Scott (författare)
Purdue University
Yoshikawa, Emily (författare)
Purdue University, US
Hartell, Eva, 1973- (författare)
KTH,Skolan för teknikvetenskaplig kommunikation och lärande (ECE),Skolan för industriell teknik och management (ITM),Teknikdidaktik
visa fler...
Strimel, Greg (författare)
Purdue University
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Athlone, Ireland : Technology Education Research Group. TERG, 2018
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: 2018 PATT36 International Conference. - Athlone, Ireland : Technology Education Research Group. TERG. - 9781527225077 - 9781527225084 ; , s. 432-440
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • As technological advances connect countries from across the world, preparing students to contribute to an internationally connected society is paramount. An understanding of the various cultures, traditions, values, and educational practices is necessary for a more-fully integrated and preparatory curriculum. Specifically, we contend that in the area of open-ended design, identifying cultural, regional, and local preferences is a necessary undertaking to assist in preparing students for success in future endeavors. However, as open-ended design is an area that can be challenging to assess and implement, effectively identifying the design values and preferences unique to different locations are necessary. Identifying these preferences and values across locations may help illuminate best-practices to the teaching and learning for an increasingly culturally-sensitive open-ended design process. In this study, 706 American middle school students participated in an open-ended design project and submitted both prototypes and portfolios for their projects. Panels of teachers and researchers from the United States, England, Ireland, and Sweden were recruited to judge the student work through Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ). Each panel was trained on the ACJ software (CompareAssess), introduced to the assignment and the assessment criteria, and provided a login to complete the ACJ. Through the final student project rankings, emerging from each of the judge panels in the ACJ process, highlighted large variations from region to region with only a few student projects appearing in the top ten rank for all regions. Comments provided by the judges, which explain the rationale behind their ACJ decisions, highlighted themes related to significant design values of each region. The identified values may help to enhance design and design-based learning across an internationally-connected society through an understanding of cultural similarities and differences.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Adaptive comparative judgment
adaptive comparative judgement
design and technology
technology education
design
assessment
international comparison
intercultural pedagogy
komparativ bedömning
teknikundervisning
teknikämnet
design
bedömning
Technology and Learning
Teknik och lärande
Teknikvetenskapens lärande och kommunikation
Education and Communication in the Technological Sciences

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
kon (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy