Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hb-3132" >
Adherence, shared d...
Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy
-
- Sandman, Lars (författare)
- Högskolan i Borås,Institutionen för Vårdvetenskap
-
Granger, Bradi (författare)
-
- Ekman, Inger, 1952 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa,Centrum för personcentrerad vård vid Göteborgs universitet (GPCC),Institute of Health and Care Sciences,University of Gothenburg Centre for person-centred care (GPCC)
-
visa fler...
-
- Munthe, Christian, 1962 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Centrum för personcentrerad vård vid Göteborgs universitet (GPCC),Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori,University of Gothenburg Centre for person-centred care (GPCC),Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2011-06-17
- 2012
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Medicine, Health care and Philosophy. - : Springer Verlag. - 1386-7423 .- 1572-8633. ; 15:2, s. 115-127
- Relaterad länk:
-
http://gup.ub.gu.se/...
-
visa fler...
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se... (primary) (free)
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- In recent years the formerly quite strong interest in patient compliance has been questioned for being too paternalistic and oriented towards overly narrow biomedical goals as the basis for treatment recommendations. In line with this there has been a shift towards using the notion of adherence to signal an increased weight for patients’ preferences and autonomy in decision making around treatments. This ‘adherence-paradigm’ thus encompasses shared decision-making as an ideal and patient perspective and autonomy as guiding goals of care. What this implies in terms of the importance that we have reason to attach to (non-)adherence and how has, however, not been explained. In this article, we explore the relationship between different forms of shared decision-making, patient autonomy and adherence. Distinguishing between dynamically and statically framed adherence we show how the version of shared decision-making advocated will have consequences for whether one should be interested in a dynamically or statically framed adherence and in what way patient adherence should be assessed. In contrast to the former compliance paradigm (where non-compliance was necessarily seen as a problem), using observations about (non-)adherence to assess the success of health care decision making and professional-patient interaction turns out to be a much less straightforward matter.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)
- HUMANIORA -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Filosofi (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Philosophy (hsv//eng)
- HUMANIORA -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Etik (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Ethics (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Medicinsk etik (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Medical Ethics (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- adherence
- patient autonomy
- shared decision-making
- compliance
- patient best interest
- Person centred care and shared decision-making
- Integrated Caring Science
- Integrerad vårdutveckling
- Adherence – Compliance
- Patient autonomy
- Patient best interest
- Shared decision-making
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas