Large-scale solidarity? Effects of welfare state institutions on the admission of forced migrants

• The variation among countries when it comes to the admittance of forced migrants - refugees and asylum seekers - is substantial. This article explains part of this variation by developing and testing an institutional explanation to the admission of forced migrants; more precisely, it investigates the impact of domestic welfare state institutions on admission. Building on comparative welfare state research, it is hypothesised that comprehensive welfare state institutions will have a positive effect on the admission of forced migrants to a country. There are three features of comprehensive welfare state institutions that could steer policies towards forced migrants in a more open direction. First, these institutions have been shown to impact on the boundaries of social solidarity. Second, they enhance generalised trust. And third, they can impact on the citizens' view of what the state should and can do in terms of protecting individuals. The argument is tested using a broad comparative dataset of patterns of forced migration, covering 17 OECD countries between 1980 and 2003. This analysis shows that comprehensive welfare state institutions have a significant positive effect on the admission of forced migrants, under control for a number of factors often highlighted in migration research.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap (hsv//swe)

SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

migration

comparative politics

welfare state

18 OECD COUNTRIES

IMMIGRATION POLICY

EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

SOCIAL

RIGHTS

MIGRATION

REGIMES

POLITICS

IMPACT

Political Science

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)

art (ämneskategori)