SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Westerberg Ulla)
 

Search: WFRF:(Westerberg Ulla) > (2010-2013) > Framework for Detai...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Framework for Detailed Comparison of Building Environmental Assessment Tools

Wallhagen, Marita, 1979- (author)
KTH,Miljöstrategisk analys (fms),Högskolan i Gävle, Avdelningen för bygg- energi- och miljöteknik,Teknisk miljövetenskap,KTH, MIljöstrategisk Analys - fms
Glaumann, Mauritz, 1942- (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,KTH,Miljöstrategisk analys (fms),University of Gävle, Sweden,Teknisk miljövetenskap,KTH Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment,, Division of Environmental Strategies Research, Department of Urban Studies, Environmental Strategies Research - fms
Eriksson, Ola, 1973- (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,Teknisk miljövetenskap
show more...
Westerberg, Ulla (author)
Högskolan i Gävle,Byggnadsteknik
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013-01-17
2013
English.
In: Buildings. - Basel, Switzerland : MDPI AG. - 2075-5309. ; 3:1, s. 39-60
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Understanding how Building Environmental Assessments Tools (BEATs) measure and define “environmental” building is of great interest to many stakeholders, but it is difficult to understand how BEATs relate to each other, as well as to make detailed and systematic tool comparisons. A framework for comparing BEATs is presented in the following which facilitates an understanding and comparison of similarities and differences in terms of structure, content, aggregation, and scope. The framework was tested by comparing three distinctly different assessment tools; LEED-NC v3, Code for Sustainable Homes (CSH), and EcoEffect. Illustrations of the hierarchical structure of the tools gave a clear overview of their structural differences. When using the framework, the analysis showed that all three tools treat issues related to the main assessment categories: Energy and Pollution, Indoor Environment, and Materials and Waste. However, the environmental issues addressed, and the parameters defining the object of study, differ and, subsequently, so do rating, results, categories, issues, input data, aggregation methodology, and weighting. This means that BEATs measure “environmental” building differently and push “environmental” design in different directions. Therefore, tool comparisons are important, and the framework can be used to make these comparisons in a more detailed and systematic way.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Samhällsbyggnadsteknik -- Miljöanalys och bygginformationsteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Civil Engineering -- Environmental Analysis and Construction Information Technology (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Samhällsbyggnadsteknik -- Arkitekturteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Civil Engineering -- Architectural Engineering (hsv//eng)

Keyword

framework
green building design
sustainable building
environmental assessment tool
LEED
code for sustainable homes
ecoeffect

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

  • Buildings (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view