| 1. |
- Abbey, Susan E., et al.
(författare)
-
Qualitative interviews versus standardised self-report questionnaires in assessing qualityb of life in heart transplant recipients
- 2011
-
Ingår i: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. - : Elsevier. - 1053-2498 .- 1557-3117. ; 30:8, s. 963-966
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Quality of life (QoL) studies in heart transplant recipients (HTRs) using validated, quantitative, self-report questionnaires have reported poor QoL in approximately 20% of patients. This consecutive mixed methods study compared self-report questionnaires, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (MOS SF-36) and the Atkinson Life Satisfaction Scale, with phenomenologically informed audiovisual (AV) qualitative interview data in 27 medically stable HTRs (70% male; age 53 ± 13.77 years; time since transplant 4.06 ± 2.42 years). Self-report questionnaire data reported poor QoL and more distress compared with previous studies and normative population samples; in contrast, 52% of HTRs displayed pervasive distress according to visual methodology. Using qualitative methods to assess QoL yields information that would otherwise remain unobserved by the exclusive use of quantitative QOL questionnaires.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Poole, Jennifer, et al.
(författare)
-
The obligation to say 'thank you' : Heart transplant recipients experience of writing to the donor family
- 2010
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Transplantation. - : Elsevier BV. - 1600-6135 .- 1600-6143. ; 11:3, s. 619-622
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Transplant recipients are encouraged to write anonymous thank-you letters to the donor family. We prospectively explored heart transplant recipients' embodied responses to the 'obligation' to write a thank-you letter using audio/video-taped open-ended interviews (N = 27). Fifteen of the 19 participants, who wrote letters to the donor family, expressed or visually revealed significant distress about issues such as the obligation to write anonymously and the inadequacy of the 'thank-you'. Writing the thank-you letter is not a neutral experience for heart transplant recipients. Rethinking the obligatory practice regarding the thank-you letter and developing the necessary support for the recipient through this process is necessary.
|
|
| 5. |
- Ross, Heather, et al.
(författare)
-
What they say versus what we see : 'Hidden' distress and impaired quality of life in heart transplant recipients
- 2010
-
Ingår i: The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. - : Elsevier. - 1053-2498 .- 1557-3117. ; 29:10, s. 1142-1149
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND:Quality of life (QoL) studies in heart transplant recipients generally rely on quantifiable self-report questionnaires and have shown that approximately 20% of patients undergo distress and poor QoL not clearly related to medical variables.METHODS:Building on existing qualitative research, we used a phenomenologically informed audiovisual method to explore the nature of "distress" in heart transplant recipients. Focused open-ended interviews were conducted in non-clinical settings with 27 medically stable heart transplant recipients (70% male, mean age 53 ± 13 years, range 18 to 72 years; mean time since transplant 4.1 ± 2.4 years). Interviews were audio/videotaped and transcribed verbatim. A qualitative software program (NVIVO8) was used to code interview transcripts and videotaped bodily gestures and "expressive artifacts" as well as vocal tone and volume.RESULTS:Distress was displayed by 88% of patients during the interview, and 52% displayed a profound disjunct between the words they used to describe their quality of life (e.g., "wonderful") and their embodied expressions of the same (e.g., protective body posturing, distressed facial expression). Most also expressed significant distress when discussing issues such as the donor and their "gift of life," as well as a disrupted sense of bodily integrity and identity that they felt could only be appreciated by fellow heart recipients.CONCLUSIONS:Increased awareness of this distress and disruption related to bodily integrity and identity after heart transplant may allow transplant professionals and researchers to see beyond "words" to more effectively reduce distress and improve quality of life.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Shildrick, Margrit, 1949-
(författare)
-
Critical Disability Studies : rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. - London : Routledge. - 9780415574006 - 9780203144114 ; , s. 452-
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- "The Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies takes a multidisciplinary approach to disability and provides an authoritative and up-to-date overview of the main issues in the field around the world today. Adopting an international perspective and consisting entirely of newly commissioned chapters arranged thematically, it surveys the state of the discipline, examining emerging and cutting edge areas as well as core areas of contention. Divided in five sections, this comprehensive handbook covers: Different models and approaches to disability How key impairment groups have engaged with disability studies and the writings within the discipline Policy and legislation responses to disability studies and to disability activism Disability studies and its interaction with other disciplines, such as history, philosophy and science and technology studies Disability studies and different life experiences, examining how disability and disability studies intersects with ethnicity, sexuality, gender, childhood and ageing. Containing chapters from an international selection of leading scholars, this authoritative handbook is an invaluable reference for all academics, researchers and more advanced students in disability studies and associated disciplines such as sociology, health studies and social work"--Provided by publisher
|
|
