| 1. |
- Øksnes, Maria, et al.
(author)
-
Lekens rolle i skandinaviske skolefritidsordninger og fritidshjem
- 2014
-
In: Barn. - 0800-1669. ; 32:3, s. 107-122
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In a general comment on article 31 UN warns against an increasing pressure for learning. A consequence of this is that children`s free spontaneous play is marginalized and that children’s spontaneous play is under pressure. With this as our backdrop we will do a close reading of how play is presented in the official documents regarding children`s institutionalized leisure in after-school programs in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Our reading show that there is room for interpretation and that the official documents are open to an understanding of play as something instrumental. This is in line with what we interpret as a dominating perspective on play. Our reading also shows that the documents are open up to a change of perspective where play is regarded for its own value.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Balling, Gitte, et al.
(author)
-
E-bogen. Skandinaviske perspektiver på forskning og uddannelse
- 2014
-
In: Nordisk Tidsskrift for informations- og kulturformidling. - : Det Informationsvidenskablige Akademi, Köbenhavns Universitet. - 2245-2931 .- 2245-294X. ; 3:1, s. 5-19
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Abstract: De skandinaviske lande har endnu ikke oplevet den samme udbredelse af e-bogen og påvirkning af bogmarkedet som det er tilfældet i de engelsksprogede lande. Alligevel er der en voksende interesse i e-bøger, ikke mindst i forsknings- og folkebibliotekerne. Denne artikel giver en oversigt over tre skandinaviske biblioteks- og informationsvidenskabelige skoler og deres forskning og undervisning i e-bøger. De respektive institutioner præsenterer deres aktuelle forskningsinteresser og -perspektiver på e-bøger og digital læsning, og hvorledes e-bøger er integreret i curriculum og uddannelser. Artiklen ender med at fremhæve fire områder, som artiklens forfattere mener, kalder på yderligere forskning inden for bibliotek- og informationsvidenskab:•Deep reading og læseoplevelser på digitale læseenheder • Den fysiske bogkulturs betydning for læsere • Aftalegrundlaget for udlån af e-bøger og ophavsret i biblioteker • E-bogens integration med andre teknologier
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Grevholm, Barbro, et al.
(author)
-
Hva er matematikk?
- 2013
-
In: Matematikkundervisning 1-7. - : Cappelen Damm Akademisk. - 9788202405458 ; , s. 31-51
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 10. |
- Henningsen, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
Organisere for organiseringens skyld - : Kultursamverkansmodellen og organisasjonsreformenes rolle i nordisk kulturpolitikk
- 2017
-
In: Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidskrift. - Oslo. - 1403-3216 .- 2000-8325. ; 20:01-02, s. 51-70
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In this article, we discuss the role of organisational reforms in Nordic cultural policy, based on a case study of the cultural cooperation model (kultursamverkansmodellen) that was implemented in Sweden in 2011. For decades, Nordic countries have opted for organisational change as a means of fulfilling principal cultural policy objectives, such as the goal of providing universal access to art and culture. However, organisational reforms have rarely led to decisive changes of such a kind and appear rather as «organising for the sake of organising». As shown in the article, the cultural cooperation model provides an ample illustration of this tendency. How can this tendency be explained and what broader lessons about mechanisms that shape cultural policy in the Nordic countries can be derived from the case of the cultural cooperation model? Inspired by the perspective of critical realism, the article formulates six hypotheses that can answer these questions. The first is that organisational reforms have come to function as a substitute for the provision of economic recourses by the government. A second hypothesis is that cultural policy objectives tend to be ascribed a symbolic value rather than to be seen as dictates for action. Our third hypothesis is that cultural policy takes place within a consensus framework that prevents substantial changes to policy. The fourth hypothesis is that cultural policy is characterized by segmented institutional structures that work against substantial changes to policy. The fifth hypothesis is that that cultural policy takes the form of a politics of recognition and that various actors’ demand for attention by the state takes precedence over other aims. The last hypothesis is that cultural policy to a low degree is subject to voter control.
|
|
