| 1. |
- Carlsson, Gunnar E, 1930, et al.
(author)
-
Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients.
- 2000
-
In: The International journal of prosthodontics. - 0893-2174. ; 13:4, s. 295-302
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the long-term periimplant bone loss in patients treated with implant-supported fixed prostheses in both jaws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The participants comprised 44 edentulous patients who have been followed for a 15-year period after treatment with a fixed implant-supported prosthesis in the mandible. Thirteen of them also received an implant-supported fixed prosthesis in the maxilla, on average 4.5 years after the mandibular treatment. The periimplant bone level was measured on intraoral radiographs. RESULTS: The long-term results of the implant treatment were successful, and only 1% (3/273) of the implants were lost in the mandible and 7% (5/75) in the maxilla. All but one of the failures occurred before the connection of the prostheses. The mean marginal bone loss around the implants was small (less than 1 mm for a 10-year period after implant placement), and was of similar magnitude in both jaws. However, the individual variation was relatively great. There was no significant difference in marginal bone loss between those who had a maxillary complete denture during the entire observation period and those who had received a fixed implant-supported maxillary prosthesis. Smokers lost more periimplant bone than did the nonsmokers; the difference was significant in the mandible but small and nonsignificant in the maxilla. CONCLUSION: The long-term periimplant bone loss was small and of similar magnitude in the mandible and the maxilla in subjects who had received implant-supported fixed prostheses in both jaws. The prosthetic status in the maxilla, i.e., complete denture or fixed implant-supported prosthesis, had no significant influence on the mandibular periimplant bone loss.
|
|
| 2. |
- Jemt, Torsten, 1950, et al.
(author)
-
A comparison of laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks supported by implants in the partially edentulous jaw: a 3-year prospective multicenter study.
- 2000
-
In: The International journal of prosthodontics. - 0893-2174. ; 13:4, s. 282-8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of laser-welded titanium fixed partial implant-supported prostheses with conventional cast frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two partially edentulous patients were provided with Brånemark system implants and arranged into 2 groups. Group A was provided with a conventional cast framework with porcelain veneers in one side of the jaw and a laser-welded titanium framework with low-fusing porcelain on the other side. The patients in group B had an old implant prosthesis replaced by a titanium framework prosthesis. The patients were followed for 3 years after prosthesis placement. Clinical and radiographic data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Only one implant was lost, and all prostheses were still in function after 3 years. The 2 framework designs showed similar clinical performance with few clinical complications. Only one abutment screw (1%) and 9 porcelain tooth units (5%) fractured. Four prostheses experienced loose gold screws (6%). In group A, marginal bone loss was similar for both designs of prostheses, with a mean of 1.0 mm and 0.3 mm in the maxilla and mandible, respectively. No bone loss was observed on average in group B. No significant relationship (P > 0.05) was observed between marginal bone loss and placement of prosthesis margin or prosthesis design. CONCLUSION: The use of laser-welded titanium frameworks seems to present similar clinical performance to conventional cast frameworks in partial implant situations after 3 years.
|
|
| 3. |
- Jemt, Torsten, 1950, et al.
(author)
-
Bone response to implant-supported frameworks with differing degrees of misfit preload: in vivo study in rabbits.
- 2000
-
In: Clinical implant dentistry and related research. - 1523-0899. ; 2:3, s. 129-37
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: To study the bone response around implants placed in tibia of rabbits that supported misfitting superstructures secured with different degrees of preload. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve rabbits were provided with two terminal 10-mm and one intermediate 7-mm-long implant in each tibia. After an integration time of about 9 weeks, nine of the animals received one control framework each (n = 9), designed with good fit to all three implants. In the other tibia of these animals, and in both tibias in the remaining three rabbits, test frameworks (n = 15) were connected with a vertical misfit of about 1 mm to the intermediate implant. The intermediate set screws were tightened with a torque ranging from 15 Ncm to 26 Ncm in the different test frameworks. The fascia and skin was then sutured back over the implants. After a loading period of 2 to 3 weeks, the animals were sacrificed, and histomorphometric measurements were made and correlated to the different levels of preload of the central implant. RESULTS: The mean bone-to-metal contact for the three best consecutive threads of the central implant was 40% for both test and control sites (p > .05). Compared to the other regions of the implant thread, less bone-to-metal contact was found at the tip of the test implant threads in the low preload group (p < .05). However, the same relation was not observed in the high preload group. A significant correlation was observed between increasing degree of preload in the central screw joint and increasing bone-to-metal contact, most obviously noticed at the tip of the implant thread (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Misfit stress levels of clinical magnitudes do not seem to jeopardize osseointegration per se. On the contrary, clinical levels of preload stress seem to significantly promote bone remodeling at the tip of the implant thread.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
