| 11. |
- Brunow, Dagmar, Prof. Dr. 1966-
(författare)
-
Archiváló beavatkozások
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Apertura. - Szeged : Apertura. - 1787-7245 .- 1787-7245. ; :Ősz
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Ungersk översättning av ett kapitel ur Brunows Remediating Transcultural Memory (Berlin/Boston: deGruyter 2015)
|
|
| 12. |
- Büki, Andras, 1966-, et al.
(författare)
-
A koponyasérülés által kiváltott axonkárosodás és kezelésének lehetóségei : [Therapeutic possibilities in axonal injury caused by head trauma]
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Orvosi Hetilap. - : Akademiai Kiado Rt.. - 0030-6002 .- 1788-6120. ; 143:10, s. 499-503
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Traumatic brain injury is putting an extreme burden on societies all over the world. While surgical and neuro-intensive treatment is traditionally aimed at space occupying or focal lesions, traumatic brain injury is frequently associated with diffuse axonal injury, which significantly contributes to its morbidity and mortality. Current taught appreciates that diffuse axonal injury is a progressive event gradually evolving from focal alterations in axolemmal permeability and the underlying axonal ultrastructure to axonal disconnection, a process amenable of therapeutic interventions. This review is primarily focusing on the clinical/neuroradiological manifestation and our contemporary knowledge of the pathobiology of traumatically evoked (diffuse-) axonal injury with particular emphasize on recent- to date, primarily experimental-therapeutic approaches that in the future might offer potential aid to the head injured.
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
- Csató, Éva Á., Professor emerita, 1948-
(författare)
-
A karaim nyelv és nyelvjárásai
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Nyelvelmélet és dialektológia 5. - Budapest : Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem. - 9789633084168 ; , s. 131-140
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of the paper is to demonstrate that the notion “Karaim language” and the status of its dialects exhibit a non-canonical language-dialect scenario. We speak today of a Karaim language which has three dialects: the Northwest dialect of the Lithuanian community (moribund), the Southwest dialect of the Galician community (practically extinct), and the Crimean dialect of the Crimean and Russian communities. The notion “Karaim language” has been established as the language of the Turkic-speaking followers of the Karaite religious confession and has become a significant element of Karaim identity across the communities.The relation between the dialects is characterized by some non-typical dialectal features. The dialects all go back to Kipchak Turkic varieties. Thus they are genealogically relatively closely related, which is a linguistic criteria for making them potential varieties of a language. The ancestor Kipchak varieties from which the dialects developed must have been different and the descendant dialects have maintained the original differences. The original language of the Crimean community is not known. The Turkic variety used by the Crimean Karaims converged with or was replaced by Crimean Tatar. This belongs to another subbranch of the Kipchak branch and is much influenced by Crimean Ottoman, an Oghuz Turkic language.No standard Karaim variety has been established; the communities have been motivated to maintain the dialectal distinctions. Thus no levelling of the dialects has taken place. The dialects are distinct; there is no fuzzy boundary between them. They have not been spoken in a contiguous dialect area, and speakers of different dialects do not easily understand each other’s dialects. Members of different communities communicate with each other in a dominating language of the area, Russian or Polish. The Karaim earlier had a common Hebrew script tradition used in Bible translation, but this was replaced in the twentieth century when the communities created their script systems. Their common religious traditions have promoted the diffusion of certain linguistic mostly lexical features, but this was mostly limited to the religious register. A linguistic description of the Karaim language comprises parallel descriptions of the Lithuanian and the Galician dialects. No unified account of their phonological and morphological systems is feasible. Their syntax share basic features due to their accommodation to the dominating typological characteristics of the area. In this respect these Karaim dialects are similar to other European Turkic languages, e.g. Gagauz.The Karaim case proves that the question what linguistic varieties are dialects of a language cannot be answered by using purely linguistic criteria. What is regarded a language most often depends on political, historical, sociological, and cultural factors. Linguistic features do, of course, play a substantial role in making varieties potential candidates for being dialects of a language. But other factors, as in case of Karaim the shared religious identity, can be decisive.
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
| 18. |
- Csenge, Szeverenyi, et al.
(författare)
-
Az ortopédiai nagymǔtétek során alkalmazott terápiás szuggesztiók hatása a beteg gyógyulására
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Orvosi Hetilap. - : Akademiai Kiado Zrt.. - 0030-6002 .- 1788-6120. ; 159:48, s. 2011-2020
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction and aim: Hip and knee replacement surgery is very demanding for patients. Medication consumption is further increased by perioperative anxiety. Besides pain killer and anxiolytic medications, patients' recovery can be enhanced by applying therapeutic suggestions, which are easily applicable during the patient-physician communication. Method: In our prospective, randomized, controlled study we examined the effects of positive suggestions on patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty in spinal anaesthesia. Members of the suggestion group received the therapeutic suggestions during a pre-surgery physician visit, and by listening to an audio recording during surgery. Results: Compared to the control group (n = 50), in the suggestion group (n = 45) the need of medication (pain killer and adjuvant pain medication) during the surgery was lower (p = 0.037), the mean change from baseline in the well-being of the patients was better on the 2nd [1.31 (0.57; 2.04); p<0.001] and 4th [0.97 (0.23; 1.7); p = 0.011] postoperative day and less transfusion had to be administered (OR: 2.37; p = 0.004). However, there was no difference between the two groups in the postoperative need of medications, in the length of hospitalisation and in the frequency of complications. Conslusion: Our results indicate that the administration of therapeutic suggestions in the perioperative period may be beneficial for orthopaedic surgery patients.
|
|
| 19. |
- Csepregi, Gyula, et al.
(författare)
-
Sülyos koponya-agy sérültek ellátása Magyarországon, 2002-ben : [Management of patients with severe head injury in Hungary, in 2002]
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Orvosi Hetilap. - : Akademiai Kiado Rt.. - 0030-6002 .- 1788-6120. ; 148:17, s. 771-777
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In Hungary, epidemiological and clinical data regarding brain injury were rather scarce. The Hungarian Society for Neurotrauma aimed to make a nation-wide study about the number and the mortality of patients with severe head trauma, the organization of management, the diagnostics and monitoring in use, and finally about the clinical practice of management. A national survey was carried out with questionnaires asking about data of 2001, and a prospective, three-month-long data collection based on case studies was also executed in 2002. The Hungarian National Ambulance and Emergency Service centralized information gathering on rescue, and transportation. To collect data of hospital care, a network of regional coordinators and hospital communicators was developed. The responders covered 76% of the hospital neurotrauma care in the country. The number of brain trauma patients was close to 14,000 per year: 71.3% mild, 19.4% moderate, and 9.4% severe trauma. According to prospective study the mortality of those patients who were admitted as severe head injury patients was 55% and the mortality of those who got into severe condition later was 35% during the acute care. These data showed much worse outcome than those published in Western European countries and North America. In the background the authors found communication disorder between prehospital and hospital care, extreme long time spent until the patients got to the first CT-exam and to the definitive care. The implementation of Hungarian and international head trauma guidelines did not spread widely.
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
