| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Basic, Goran
(author)
-
Idealna žrtva i nadmetanje za dobijanje statusa žrtve u pričama preživjelih rata u Bosni i Hercegovini
- 2015
-
In: Temida. - 1450-6637. ; 18:2, s. 7-30
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Previous research on victimhood often has presented a one-sided picture of the “victim” and “perpetrator”. Researchers have emphasized the importance of narratives and they have focused on narratives about victimhood, but a researcher has not analyzed post-war interviews as a competition for victimhood. This article tries to fill this gap using stories told by survivors of the Bosnian war during the 1990s. I focus on describing the informants portrayal of “victimhood” as well as analysing those discursive patterns which contributed in constructing the category “victim” and ”perpetrator”. My research question is: How do the interviewees describe victimhood after the war? When, after the war, different actors claim this “victim” status, it sparks a competition for victimhood. All informants are eager to present themselves as victims while at the same time for the other categories victim status is downplayed. In this reproduction of competition for the victim role, all demarcations that were played out so successfully during the war live on.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Basic, Goran
(author)
-
Pomirenje i nepomirljivost u pričama preživjelih poslije rata u Bosni i Hercegovini
- 2015
-
In: Kriminalističke teme. Časopis za kriminalistiku, kriminologiju i sigurnosne studije / Journal of Criminal Justice Issues. - 1512-5505. ; 15:1-2, s. 75-96
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Reason(s) for writing and research problem(s): Previous research on post-war society emphasized structural violence with subsequent reconciliation processes. Aims of the paper (scientific and/or social): Researchers have focused on the importance of narratives, but they have neither highlighted narratives about reconciliation nor analyzed conditions for reconciliation in post-war interviews. One aim of the article is analyzing markers for reconciliation and implacability, the second is describing conditions for reconciliation which are actualized in those stories. Methodology/Design: This article analyzes retold experiences of 27 survivors from the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1992 and 1995. The material for the study was gathered through qualitative interviews with 27 individuals who survived the war in north-western Bosnia and Herzegovina. Research/paper limitations: Interactive dynamics which prevailed during the war associate post-war reconciliation with the war time. Results/Findings: These stories of reconciliation, implacability and conditions for reconciliation, are not created in relation to the war as a whole only but also in relation to one’s own and other’s personal actions during the war. General conclusion: These stories on reconciliation become a forum for confrontation between us and them – not least through dissociation from others war actions. In the interviewees stories implacability is predominant however reconciliation is said to be possible if certain conditions are met. These conditions are, among others, justice for war victims, that the perpetrators’ recognize their crimes and display strong emotions (for example remorse and shame).
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Brala-Vukanovi, Maja, et al.
(author)
-
SLICNOST ISKAZANA ZAMJENICAMA I ZAMJENICKIM PRILOZIMA U HRVATSKOME JEZIKU : KVALITATIVNE, KVANTITATIVNE I INE ODREDNICE
- 2021
-
In: Fluminensia. - 0353-4642. ; 33:2, s. 387-416
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- We investigate a particular subclass of semantic features associated with demonstratives of quantity and quality, and the respective interrogatives. We explore these lexical elements as they behave linguistically in simile constructions in Croatian. We show that the semantic features that can be focused on in similes are the same as the references of the full system of Croatian demonstratives. However, the possibility to focus on a particular semantic feature by a specific choice of demonstrative or interrogative in simile constructions is being replaced in usage by the generic simile word 'kao'.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
