| 1. |
- Andersson, Henrik, et al.
(författare)
-
The Ethics of Population Policies
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (CRISPP). - : Informa UK Limited. - 1369-8230 .- 1743-8772.
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
- Brandstedt, Eric
(författare)
-
An Interview with Professor Simon Caney
- 2014
-
Ingår i: De Ethica : A Journal of Philosphical, Theological and Applied Ethics. - : Linkoping University Electronic Press. - 2001-8819. ; 1:1, s. 71-84
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
- Brandstedt, Eric
(författare)
-
Att stödja tvärvetenskapliga doktoranders frigörelse från disciplinära föreställningar
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Högre utbildning. - : Cappelen Damm AS - Cappelen Damm Akademisk. - 2000-7558. ; 12:1, s. 5-12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Ambitious ideals about interdisciplinarity are notoriously difficult to put into practice, partly because they are counteracted by how many universities are organised. This is a problem for doctoral students in interdisciplinary projects as well as for their supervisors. Interdisciplinary doctoral students, like all doctoral students, have a research subject in which they are expected to develop into independent researchers, but also an expectation that they will broaden and integrate perspectives from other subjects. This leads to a difficult challenge for both the doctoral student and its supervisor: how should the time be enough? It is difficult to combine reasonable demands and expectations on doctoral students’ independence development with achieving ambitious interdisciplinary ideals. How can this be handled from the perspective of the supervisor who has a more monodisciplinary background than the one the doctoral student is expected to get? How can this supervisor support the doctoral student’s development into an independent interdisciplinary researcher? This article focuses on monodisciplinary preconceptions that supervisors of interdisciplinary doctoral students convey and how they can limit the doctoral students’ opportunities to become independent interdisciplinary researchers. An ideal of a kind of emancipation from certain monodisciplinary ideas is formulated.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Brandstedt, Eric, et al.
(författare)
-
Climate Rights : Feasible or Not?
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Environmental Politics. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0964-4016 .- 1743-8934. ; 22:3, s. 394-409
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Scholars have argued that we have compelling reasons to combat climate change because it threatens human rights, referred to here as ‘climate rights’. The prospects of climate rights are analysed assuming two basic desiderata: its accuracy in capturing the normative dimension of climate change (reasons to prevent/mitigate/adapt to climate change); and its ability to generate political measures. In order for climate rights to meet these desiderata certain conditions must be satisfied: important human interests are put at risk by global climate change; there is an identified rights-holder and obligation-bearer; this relationship is codified in a legitimate formal structure; it is feasible to claim the rights; an ‘enforcement mechanism’ (not necessarily of legal character) could strengthen compliance. When asserting climate rights it is insufficient to consider the moral ground or actual enforcement possibilities by themselves. Normative and practical aspects are closely interlinked and must be studied in tandem.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Brandstedt, Eric
(författare)
-
Framtida människors lika värde
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Tidskrift för politisk filosofi. - 1402-2710. ; , s. 12-25
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Är doktrinen om ”alla människors lika värde” tillämpbar också på framtida, ännu icke levande personer? Artikeln argumenterar för ett jakande svar och ger därmed ett bidrag till hur denna vanliga moraliska övertygelse ska förstås och ger dessutom nya argument för omsorg gentemot framtida personer. Doktrinen tolkas som en kritik av handlingar och situationer snarare än som en fullständig värdering av människoliv. Utifrån den förståelsen används övertygelsen om alla människors lika värde för att kritisera "ren tidsdiskontering", för att försvara idén om framtida personers rättigheter, och som argument för skyldigheten att efterlämna ett människovärdigt arv.
|
|
