| 1. |
- Dickstein, Kenneth, et al.
(författare)
-
CRT Survey II : a European Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 11 088 patients-who is doing what to whom and how?
- 2018
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : WILEY. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 20:6, s. 1039-1051
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients with heart failure and is strongly recommended for such patients by guidelines. A European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CRT survey conducted in 2008-2009 showed considerable variation in guideline adherence and large individual, national and regional differences in patient selection, implantation practice and follow-up. Accordingly, two ESC associations, the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Failure Association, designed a second prospective survey to describe contemporary clinical practice regarding CRT. Methods and results A survey of the clinical practice of CRT-P and CRT-D implantation was conducted from October 2015 to December 2016 in 42 ESC member countries. Implanting centres provided information about their hospital and CRT service and were asked to complete a web-based case report form collecting information on patient characteristics, investigations, implantation procedures and complications during the index hospitalisation. The 11 088 patients enrolled represented 11% of the total number of expected implantations in participating countries during the survey period; 32% of patients were aged >= 75 years, 28% of procedures were upgrades from a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and 30% were CRT-P rather than CRT-D. Most patients (88%) had a QRS duration >= 130 ms, 73% had left bundle branch block and 26% were in atrial fibrillation at the time of implantation. Large geographical variations in clinical practice were observed. Conclusion CRT Survey II provides a valuable source of information on contemporary clinical practice with respect to CRT implantation in a large sample of ESC member states. The survey permits assessment of guideline adherence and demonstrates variations in patient selection, management, implantation procedure and follow-up strategy.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Lenderink, Timo, et al.
(författare)
-
Patients using statin treatment within 24 h after admission for ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes had lower mortality than non-users : a report from the first Euro Heart Survey on acute coronary syndromes
- 2006
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 27:15, s. 1799-1804
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: Statins provide effective secondary prevention in cardiovascular disease. However, it remains uncertain how soon statins should be started after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recently published trials suggest starting before discharge. We hypothesize that statins should be initiated without delay. Methods and results: Data from a large cohort of 10 484 consecutive patients with an ACS were analysed. Of this cohort, 1426 first-time statin receivers and survivors of the first 24 h were compared with 6771 first-day survivors not receiving statin therapy. A propensity score for the likelihood of receiving statin therapy within 24 h was developed and used with other established risk factors in a multivariable analysis. There was a significantly reduced all-cause 7-day mortality in patients receiving early statin therapy [0.4 vs. 2.6%, unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.37, adjusted HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.79]. Statistical significance was observed in patients presenting with STE-ACS (adjusted HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.70) and not in NSTE-ACS patients. However, no statistical evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect was observed between these groups. Conclusion: These data suggest that very early statin therapy is associated with reduced mortality in patients presenting with STE-ACS; however, these findings have to be confirmed by prospective, randomized controlled trials before firm treatment recommendations can be given.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
