| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Karyotaki, Eirini, et al.
(författare)
-
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression : A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis
- 2021
-
Ingår i: JAMA psychiatry. - : American Medical Association. - 2168-6238 .- 2168-622X. ; 78:4, s. 361-371
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- IMPORTANCE: Personalized treatment choices would increase the effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for depression to the extent that patients differ in interventions that better suit them.OBJECTIVE: To provide personalized estimates of short-term and long-term relative efficacy of guided and unguided iCBT for depression using patient-level information.DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published up to January 1, 2019.STUDY SELECTION: Eligible RCTs were those comparing guided or unguided iCBT against each other or against any control intervention in individuals with depression. Available individual patient data (IPD) was collected from all eligible studies. Depression symptom severity was assessed after treatment, 6 months, and 12 months after randomization.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We conducted a systematic review and IPD network meta-analysis and estimated relative treatment effect sizes across different patient characteristics through IPD network meta-regression.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores.RESULTS: Of 42 eligible RCTs, 39 studies comprising 9751 participants with depression contributed IPD to the IPD network meta-analysis, of which 8107 IPD were synthesized. Overall, both guided and unguided iCBT were associated with more effectiveness as measured by PHQ-9 scores than control treatments over the short term and the long term. Guided iCBT was associated with more effectiveness than unguided iCBT (mean difference [MD] in posttreatment PHQ-9 scores, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.2), but we found no evidence of a difference at 6 or 12 months following randomization. Baseline depression was found to be the most important modifier of the relative association for efficacy of guided vs unguided iCBT. Differences between unguided and guided iCBT in people with baseline symptoms of subthreshold depression (PHQ-9 scores 5-9) were small, while guided iCBT was associated with overall better outcomes in patients with baseline PHQ-9 greater than 9.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this network meta-analysis with IPD, guided iCBT was associated with more effectiveness than unguided iCBT for individuals with depression, benefits were more substantial in individuals with moderate to severe depression. Unguided iCBT was associated with similar effectiveness among individuals with symptoms of mild/subthreshold depression. Personalized treatment selection is entirely possible and necessary to ensure the best allocation of treatment resources for depression.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Kern, D, et al.
(författare)
-
Brief self-guided digital intervention versus a comprehensive therapist-guided online cognitive behavioural therapy for atopic dermatitis: a trial protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 13:2, s. e068908-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Our aim is to investigate whether a shortened digital self-care intervention is non-inferior to, and cost-effective compared with, a comprehensive and therapist-guided cognitive behavioural therapy treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD).Methods and analysisThis is a single-blind, randomised clinical non-inferiority trial at Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Stockholm, Sweden. We will recruit 174 adult participants with AD through self-referral. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to the two experimental conditions. Participants randomised to guided care will receive internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for 12 weeks. Participants randomised to digital self-care will have access to this self-guided intervention for 12 weeks. At post-treatment (primary endpoint), non-inferiority will be tested and resource use will be compared between the two treatment groups. Cost-effectiveness will be explored at 1-year follow-up. Potential mediators will be investigated. Data will be analysed intention to treat. We define non-inferiority as a three-point difference on the primary outcome measure (Patient-oriented Eczema Measure). Recruitment started in November 2022.Ethics and disseminationThis study is approved by the Swedish ethics authority (reg. no 2021-06704-01) and is preregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The study will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.Trial registration numberNCT05517850.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Hedman, E., et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for depression in routine psychiatric care
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Journal of Affective Disorders. - : Elsevier. - 0165-0327 .- 1573-2517. ; 155:1, s. 49-58
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Efficacy of guided Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) for depression has been demonstrated in several randomised controlled trials. Knowledge on the effectiveness of the treatment, i.e. how it works when delivered within routine care, is however scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of ICBT for depression.Methods: We conducted a cohort study investigating all patients (N =1203) who had received guided ICBT for depression between 2007 and 2013 in a routine care setting at an outpatient psychiatric clinic providing Internet-based treatment The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale-Self rated (MADRS-S).Results: Patients made large improvements from pre-treatment assessments to post-treatment on the primary outcome (effect size d on the MADRS-S = 1.27, 99% CI, 1.14-1.39). Participants were significantly improved in terms of suicidal ideation and sleep difficulties improvements were sustained at 6-month follow-up.Limitations: Attrition was rather large at 6-month follow-up. However, additional data was collected through telephone interviews with dropouts and advanced statistical models indicated that missing data did not bias the findings.Conclusions: ICBT for depression can be highly effective when delivered within the context of routine psychiatric care. This study suggests that the effect sizes are at least as high when the treatment is delivered in routine psychiatric care by qualified staff as when delivered in a controlled trial setting.
|
|
| 9. |
- Hentati, A, et al.
(författare)
-
A self-guided and monitored digital problem-solving intervention for patients with symptoms of depression or anxiety on the waiting list for treatment in routine psychiatric care: feasibility study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: BJPsych open. - : Royal College of Psychiatrists. - 2056-4724. ; 8:2, s. e43-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- There is often a waiting period for people who seek psychiatric treatment for depression or anxiety. As this delay risks worsening symptoms, an alternative could be to provide an intervention that requires minimal resources during the waiting period.AimsThe aim was to investigate if a digital problem-solving intervention delivered in a self-guided format with automated features is feasible to provide for patients on the waiting list in routine psychiatric care.MethodA total of 12 patients with symptoms of depression or anxiety on the waiting list for treatment in routine psychiatric care were given access to a self-guided and monitored digital problem-solving intervention over 4 weeks. Primary outcome measures were treatment credibility and usability. Secondary outcome measures were behavioural engagement, symptoms of depression and anxiety, and negative effects.ResultsA majority of participants rated the intervention as both credible and usable. The intervention was used at least once by nine out of 12 individuals, with an average of 11 logins. The participants did, on average, initiate 2.8 problem-solving attempts and 10.1 solutions. A few participants reached a clinically relevant symptom improvement of depression and anxiety. No serious negative effects were reported.ConclusionsThe credibility and usability of the intervention was perceived as good, and the behavioural engagement with the intervention was deemed sufficient compared with similar self-guided interventions. A self-guided and monitored digital problem-solving intervention may be a beneficial option for patients waiting for or receiving treatment in routine psychiatric care, and should be further evaluated.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
