| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Abrahamsson, Cristian, et al.
(författare)
-
Content, interest and the role of engagement : experienced science teachers discuss
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Physics Education. - Bristol : Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP). - 0031-9120 .- 1361-6552. ; 58:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- How do science teachers perceive student engagement and its importance for teaching and what strategies do they use to create it? When 21 experienced science teachers in 4 focus groups discussed these questions, they brought up behavioural aspects, but also less visible emotional and cognitive aspects, as well as reciprocal aspects of teacher and student engagement. One teacher described engagement as 'the oil in the machinery' during lessons. Which role does the curricular content play? Well aware that some topics are seen as more directly interesting by students, teachers connect to these, but also use hooks, including lively demonstrations, role play and connections to the outside world. In this way, they aim to generate situational interest and engagement also in topics that are often viewed as less interesting, including atoms and molecules. These experienced teachers describe how they adapt their teaching to the group also in real time, based on the degree of engagement exhibited by the students. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
|
|
| 3. |
- Abrahamsson, Cristian, et al.
(författare)
-
En Delfistudie om lärares uppfattning av elevengagemang i NO-undervisningen
- 2019
-
Ingår i: NorDiNa. - Oslo : Naturfagsenteret / Norwegian Centre for Science Education. - 1504-4556 .- 1894-1257. ; 15:2, s. 128-144
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- What happens in a science classroom where students are engaged and how do teachers observe and interpret student engagement? This article highlights teachers’ perspective on students’ engagement in science education and to what extent it is connected to the scientific content. This approach complements earlier research which focuses mostly on students’ attitude towards science education and their interest in various topics in science.The findings are based on a three-stage Delphi survey distributed to 39 expert science teachers. The results shows science education with a range of different perspectives and that most teachers do not perceive any direct connection between specific science topics and the students’ engagement. The survey also shows that teachers to a high level interpret students’ emotional expressions and academic behavior as engagement rather than their cognitive behavior.
|
|
| 4. |
- Almqvist, Kristian, et al.
(författare)
-
Hjältar i en annan värld - om ett äventyrligt pedagogiskt arbetssätt
- 2011
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Denna rapport från en forskningscirkel med deltagare från kulturhuset Drömmarnas Hus och Malmö högskola handlar om en sammansmältning av kulturpedagogik, äventyrspedagogik och undervisning för hållbar utveckling. Den beskriver arbetet med hur elever fick uppleva äventyret "Naturkrafternas dal", vilket syftade till att eleverna skulle uppleva känsla av sammanhang, handlingskraft, glädje, självstärkande grupprocesser och positiva upplevelser av och i skogen.
|
|
| 5. |
- Atkinson, Lucy, et al.
(författare)
-
The Environment and Political Participation in Science Education
- 2023
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- There is increasing attention to the role of education in teaching environmental issues such as climate change (Teach the Future, n.d.). Whilst environmental issues are science-dependent, science is not sufficient to respond to today’s environmental challenges. Yet internationally, science and geography are those subjects most likely to include environmental content (UNESCO, 2021). In England, students can expect to learn about environmental challenges including climate change, biodiversity and pollution during their compulsory science education (DfE, 2013). These topics are often controversial, rife with moral tensions (Zeidler, Herman, & Sadler, 2019), and characterised by both descriptive facts and normative values. The values often deal with solutions to the problems, what kind of actions can be taken on an individual or societal level and even what kind of society is preferred. This makes the issues both scientific and political. Yet little is known about how politics enters the science classroom. In this study, we aim to understand how environmental politics enters the classroom, and how science teachers address different approaches to political participation with their students.In order to develop democratic environmental governance, there is a need for representation of different groups of people, opportunities for participation and for spaces for deliberation (Lidskog & Elander, 2007), i.e. for politics. Schools are potential sites for participation and deliberation and for learning democracy (Biesta & Lawy, 2006). Politics can be defined in different ways, from a narrow focus on electoral processes to broader conceptualisations which include different ways of making decisions and shaping power relations. In this study, we are concerned with power and social change (Dahl & Stinebrickner, 2003) i.e. “the capacity for agency and deliberation in situations of genuine collective or social choice” (Hay, 2007, p. 77) through science education. This definition of politics goes beyond electoral and party politics and includes activities outside formal political institutions. This is in accordance with Heywood (1999)’s characterisation of politics as an a social activity that arises out of interaction between or among people, which develops out of diversity (the existence of different interests, wants, needs and goals), and which relates to collective decisions which are regarded as binding upon a group of people. Carter (2018) identifies the environment as a policy problem for several reasons, including that the environment can be considered a public good, with complex and interdependent relationships between people and ecosystems acting across national borders with consequences felt into the future.This characterisation of politics is relevant to the study context as education is a social activity which brings together people with different views, interests and goals in relation to the environment, and it is a context in which collective decisions can be made, for example, about how the school function, what is taught (and how), and what actions or outcomes are desirable as a result of education. Not all of these actions and outcomes can be considered political and we see politics as related to societal engagement and political participation more broadly. Ekman and Amnå (2012) have developed a typology of different forms of participation in society. They distinguish between (a) non-participation (disengagement); (b) civic participation (latent political), whether social involvement or civic engagement; and (c) political participation (manifest political), which can be formal political participation or activism. Each of these three types of participation are further classified in terms of individual and collective forms. In this study, we use Ekman and Amnå’s (2012) typology to understand the ways in which teachers address the political dimensions of the environment in school science. The research question we set out to explore in the study is: how do science teachers address political participation in science education?Methodology, Methods, Research Instruments or Sources UsedAn exploratory qualitative approach was used to understand science teachers’ perceptions and approaches to environmental politics. We focused on science teachers with responsibility for teaching students aged 11-16 in England because we were interested in what students experience during their compulsory secondary science education, where the curriculum demands that they learn about ecosystems and the environment.A deductive approach to instrument design was used, drawing on Ekman and Amnå’s (2012) typology of latent and manifest political participation and non-participation (see Table 1 above) in the design of the interview guide and in the analysis of data to understand the ways in which politics enters the science classroom. Given the potentially sensitive nature of some of the questions, we used one-to-one interviews, conducted online to increase the geographical reach, and minimise the need for travel. The interview guide contained open-ended questions on science teachers’ perspectives on and experiences of teaching environmental politics in science education. We deliberately did not ask about educational policy; only about teachers’ own experiences, practices, personal perspectives and barriers they encountered. Participants were provided with an infographic using examples from Ekman and Amnå’s (2012) typology and asked to mark ways of participating in society which they had:planned and taught (green); mentioned in passing or in response to a question from a student (orange); and, never addressed (red). The interview focused on reasons for these decisions. Interviews were conducted by three members of the research team and took place in January - June 2022. Each lasted approximately 1 hour.Interviews with 11 teachers were recorded and transcribed and interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) (Smith, 2004) used to analyse the data. This approach aims not at generalisation but rather to understand how individuals make sense of their own experiences (Guihen, 2019), namely, how politics enters the science classroom. IPA is typically used to generate meaningful insights from a small dataset, often in psychology and health sciences. It is appropriate here because it provides a way to understand how participants make sense of their social world, it allows for diversity of perceptions rather than looking for a single objective truth and it allows researchers to interpret these experiences and understand the perspective of an insider and then interpret what it means for them to have this perspective (Reid, Flowers, & Larkin, 2005). An iterative approach to data analysis was used, with reflexive discussions between each stage of analysis. Conclusions, Expected Outcomes or FindingsTeachers participating in this study saw a place for politics in science education. However, it was described as almost absent in lessons. Teachers were more likely to discuss individual, legal, forms of participation, focusing on civil (latent political) actions rather than collective, manifest forms of participating. Even when politics enters the classroom, it tends to be students rather than teachers who introduce the topic, unless there are links to the curriculum or other legal and political frameworks. Policy (national and school) and colleague and student perceptions prevented teachers from planning to discuss manifest forms of political participation with students. Politics (especially collective aspects) are experienced as off-limits to teachers in the study. This post-political logic distances people (here, young people but also teachers) from involvement in decision-making and reduces their capacity to be involved in environmental decision-making now and in the future. These absences, we argue, contribute to a broader societal trend which closes off spaces to discuss and celebrate disagreement (Blühdorn & Deflorian, 2021), and which diminish the potential for young people to learn democracy. In order to develop democratic governance of environmental issues, there is a need for representation, opportunities for participation and for spaces for deliberation (Liskog & Elander, 2007). Schools are in many ways ideal sites to encourage political participation as they are shared spaces of learning - both about forms of participation but also how to participate and to deliberate across disagreement, or as one of the teachers in this study put it ‘we need to teach them how to use their voice properly and how to be heard’. This requires those who are in positions where they can act to listen to these voices and engage in deliberation and bring politics - as the capacity to deliberate and make collective decisions - into the science classroom.
|
|
| 6. |
-
Att arbeta med samhällsfrågor i NO-undervisningen i mångfaldens skola : rapport från forskningscirkeln
- 2010
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- What’s the point of the school? Det frågar sig Guy Claxton (2008) redan i titeln till sin bok. Vilken är egentligen poängen med skolan? Är det att klara proven och få bra betyg och sedan kunna ”bli vad man vill”? Betygens drivkraft visar sig ofta vara stor när man frågar elever om vad som är viktigt för att få dem att arbeta i skolan. I den allmänna debatten framförs ofta vikten av djupa ämneskunskaper. Andra hävdar att poängen med skolan är en inskolning i det sociala spel som man förväntas klara av i samhället. Självklart är alla dessa kunskaper och kompetenser viktiga poänger med skolan. Vi menar dock att det är för mycket fokus på att barnen och ungdomarna ska vara framgångsrika elever och för lite fokus på att de ska vara kompetenta lärande individer – eller varför inte kalla det samhällsmedborgare. Med det menar vi att barnen och ungdomar behöver kompetenser för att klara av saker som de möter utanför skolan i framtiden. Det är kompetenser som handlar mer om att göra än kunna, om att lösa problem man ställs inför snarare än att återge det som läraren eller läroboken berättar. Det innebär t.ex. att kritiskt granska information, ta informerade beslut och uppvisa handlingskompetens – när det gäller att konsumera eller förändra sina vanor. (Jensen & Schnack, 2006). Framtidsforskare har lyft fram optimism, flexibilitet och handlingskompetens som viktiga egenskaper för att kunna hantera samhällsförändringar (Hicks & Holden, 2007, Arnaldi ,2008). Men hur gör man för att stödja eleverna i utvecklandet av dessa kompetenser? Ett sätt som har framförts av forskare är att arbeta med aktuella samhällsfrågor som har ett naturvetenskapligt innehåll . I den forskningscirkel, från vilken den här skriften är en produkt, har lärarlag på två skolor i Malmö prövat arbetssättet.
|
|
| 7. |
- Byrne, Jenny, et al.
(författare)
-
Climate change and everyday life : repertoires children use to negotiate a socio-scientific issue
- 2014
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Science Education. - Abingdon, Oxon : Taylor & Francis. - 0950-0693 .- 1464-5289. ; 36:9, s. 1491-1509
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- There are only a few studies about how primary school students engage in socio-scientific discussions. This study aims to add to this field of research by focusing on how 9–10-year-olds in Sweden and England handle climate change as a complex environmental socio-scientific issue (SSI), within the context of their own lives and in relation to society at large. It focuses on how different interpretative repertoires were used by the students in discussions to legitimise or question their everyday lifestyles. They discussed four possible options that a government might consider to help reduce carbon dioxide production. Six main repertoires were identified: Everyday life, Self-Interest, Environment, Science and Technology, Society and Justice. The Everyday life repertoire was used when students related their discussion to their everyday lifestyles. Science and technology-related solutions were offered to maintain or improve things, but these were sometimes rather unrealistic. Arguments related to environment and health frequently appeared to have a superior status compared to the others. Findings also highlighted how conflicts between the students were actually productive by bringing in several perspectives to negotiate the solutions. These primary school students were, therefore, able to discuss and negotiate a complex real-world SSI. Students positioned themselves as active contributors to society, using their life experiences and limited knowledge to understand the problems that affected their everyday lives. Honing these skills within a school science community of practice could facilitate primary students’ engagement with SSIs and empower them as citizens.
|
|
| 8. |
- Byrne, Jenny, et al.
(författare)
-
How primary school students in Sweden and England discuss global warming
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Science learning and citizenship.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This study identifies and categorizes the discursive repertoires used by 9-10 year old children in Sweden and England during discussions about the socio-scientific issue of global warming. School science is a community of practice where student identities and discourses can be expressed and developed, and the research focuses on how the use of repertoires is related to the identities the students express in their discussions. It explores what repertoires become important in the discussions, which identities the students express, and what differences there are between children’s discussions in Sweden and England. The children discussed four possible options that a government might consider to help reduce global warming. Findings indicate that children in both countries use a range of similar repertoires when discussing global warming. When these repertoires are in conflict with each other, students have to ‘renegotiate’ their own identities. Socio-economic status appears to have an effect on the intensity and depth of argument in the Swedish schools, whereas in the English schools the level and quality of argument seemed to be more closely connected to children’s familiarity with a discursive classroom environment. Young children seem capable of applying a variety of arguments that are logical to them according to the repertoire(s) they employ, but we must encourage changes to pedagogical practice that enable all children to engage in such socio-scientific discussions.
|
|
| 9. |
- Caiman, Cecilia, et al.
(författare)
-
Didaktiska perspektiv på hållbar utveckling
- 2018
-
Annan publikation (refereegranskat)abstract
- Kapitlet ger en introduktion till lärande i hållbar utveckling. Det görs genom att ge en bild av hur de komplexa och ämnesövergripande hållbarhetsfrågorna kan karaktäriseras. Kapitlet lägger vikt vid att diskutera och problematisera de viktiga frågorna, varför behövs en undervisning i hållbar utveckling, vad ska undervisningen innehålla samt hur ska den organiseras.
|
|
| 10. |
- Caiman, Cecilia, et al.
(författare)
-
Hela skolan för hållbar utveckling
- 2018
-
Annan publikation (refereegranskat)abstract
- Den här delen avslutar modulen samtidigt som den blickar framåt mot arbetslagets och skolans utveckling. Syftet med delen är att bidra till hur skolans personal kan arbeta med att utveckla en skola som har som mål att i verksamheten som helhet arbeta med hållbarhet.I delen presenteras en modell för hur en skola kan arbeta med skolutveckling som en demokratisk process. Delen diskuterar Framtidsverkstad, som är en metod för att starta en förändringsprocess. Den visar ett exempel från en skola och hur ett arbetslag genomför en framtidsverkstad. Ni får även möjlighet att pröva att genomföra en framtidsverkstad på den egna skolan. Delen tar också upp idéer om organisationsförändring.
|
|
