| 1. |
- Conley, Robert B., et al.
(författare)
-
Secondary Fracture Prevention : Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. - 0890-5339. ; 34:4, s. 125-141
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fractureamong people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, andsubcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficaciousandcanreduce risk of future fracture.Patientsneededucation,however, about thebenefitsandrisks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive butmay be beneficial for selected patients at high risk.Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the earlypost-fractureperiod,prompt treatment is recommended.Adequate dietary or supplemental vitaminDand calciumintake shouldbe assured. Individuals beingtreatedfor osteoporosis shouldbe reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, includingvia patienteducationabout osteoporosisandfracturesandmonitoringfor adverse treatment effects.Patients shouldbestronglyencouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol inmoderation atmost, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease).
|
|
| 2. |
- Conley, Robert B., et al.
(författare)
-
Secondary Fracture Prevention : Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Orthopaedic Nursing. - 0744-6020. ; 39:3, s. 145-161
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fracture among people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, and subcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficacious and can reduce risk offuture fracture. Patients need education, however, about the benefits and risks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive but may be beneficial for selected patients at high risk. Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the riskfor second fractures is highest in the early post-fracture period, prompt treatment is recommended. Adequate dietary or supplemental vitamin D and calcium intake should be assured. Individuals being treated for osteoporosis should be reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, including via patient education about osteoporosis and fractures and monitoring foradverse treatment effects. Patients should be strongly encouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol in moderation at most, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease). (c) 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
|
|
| 3. |
- Langdahl, Bente L., et al.
(författare)
-
Fracture Rate, Quality of Life and Back Pain in Patients with Osteoporosis Treated with Teriparatide : 24-Month Results from the Extended Forsteo Observational Study (ExFOS)
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Calcified Tissue International. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0171-967X .- 1432-0827. ; 99:3, s. 259-271
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We describe the pre-planned interim analysis of fracture outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and back pain in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide for up to 24 months in the Extended Forsteo (Forsteo(A (R)) is a registered trade name of Eli Lilly and Company) Observational Study (ExFOS), a prospective, multinational, observational study. Data on incident clinical fractures, HRQoL (EQ-5D questionnaire) and back pain [100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)] were collected. The number of patients with fractures was summarised in 6-month intervals and fracture rate over each 6-month period was assessed using logistic regression for repeated measures. Changes from baseline in EQ-5D and back pain VAS were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Of 1454 patients in the active treatment cohort, 90.6 % were female and 14.4 % were taking glucocorticoids. During teriparatide treatment (median duration 23.7 months), 103 patients (7.1 %) sustained a total of 122 incident clinical fractures (21 % vertebral, 79 % non-vertebral). A 49 % decrease in the odds of fractures and a 75 % decrease in the odds of clinical vertebral fractures were observed in the > 18- to 24-month period versus the first 6-month period (both p < 0.05). EQ-5D scores and back pain VAS scores were significantly improved from baseline at each post-baseline observation during teriparatide treatment. In conclusion, patients with severe osteoporosis showed a significant reduction in the incident fracture rate during 24 months of teriparatide treatment in routine clinical practice, accompanied by a significant improvement in HRQoL and reduction in back pain. Results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.
|
|
| 4. |
- Napoli, Nicola, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis in Clinical Practice : 42-Month Results During and After Discontinuation of Treatment from the European Extended Forsteo (R) Observational Study (ExFOS)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Calcified Tissue International. - : SPRINGER. - 0171-967X .- 1432-0827. ; 103:4, s. 359-371
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study aimed to describe clinical outcomes in patients prescribed teriparatide and followed up for 18months after stopping the drug in real-life conditions. The Extended Forsteo (R) Observational Study analysed incident clinical fractures in 6-month intervals using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes in back pain (visual analogue scale) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EQ-5D questionnaire) were analysed using mixed models for repeated measures. Patients were analysed if they had a post-baseline visit, regardless of whether and for how long they took teriparatide. Of 1531 patients analysed (90.7% female, mean age: 70.3years), 76 (5.0%) never took teriparatide. Median treatment duration was 23.6months. The adjusted odds of clinical fracture decreased by 47% in the >12- to 18-month treatment period (p=0.013) compared with the first 6-month period, with no statistically significant reduction in the >18- to 24-month interval. The clinical fracture rate remained stable during the 18 months' post-teriparatide, when approximately 98% of patients took osteoporosis medication (51% bisphosphonates). Clinical vertebral fractures were reduced at every time period compared with the first 6months. Adjusted mean back pain scores decreased and EQ-5D scores increased significantly at each post-baseline observation. In a real-life clinical setting, the risk of clinical fractures declined during 24months of teriparatide treatment. This reduction was maintained 18months after stopping teriparatide. In parallel, patients reported significant improvements in back pain and HRQoL. The results should be interpreted in the context of the non-controlled design of this observational study.
|
|
| 5. |
- Strollo, Rocky, et al.
(författare)
-
Antibodies to oxidized insulin improve prediction of type 1 diabetes in children with positive standard islet autoantibodies
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Diabetes/Metabolism Research Reviews. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1520-7552 .- 1520-7560. ; 35:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundAntibodies to posttranslationally modified insulin (oxPTM‐INS‐Ab) are a novel biomarker of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Here, we evaluated whether oxPTM‐INS‐Ab can improve T1D prediction in children with positive standard islet autoantibodies (AAB).MethodsWe evaluated sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and risk for progression to T1D associated with oxPTM‐INS‐Ab and the standard islet AAB that include insulin (IAA), GAD (GADA), and tyrosine phosphatase 2 (IA‐2A) in a cohort of islet AAB‐positive (AAB+) children from the general population (median follow‐up 8.8 years).ResultsoxPTM‐INS‐Ab was the most sensitive and specific autoantibody biomarker (74% sensitivity, 91% specificity), followed by IA‐2A (71% sensitivity, 91% specificity). GADA and IAA showed lower sensitivity (65% and 50%, respectively) and specificity (66% and 68%, respectively). Accuracy (AUC of ROC) of oxPTM‐INS‐Ab was higher than GADA and IAA (P = 0.003 and P = 0.017, respectively), and similar to IA‐2A (P = 0.896). oxPTM‐INS‐Ab and IA‐2A were more effective than IAA for detecting progr‐T1D when used as second‐line biomarker in GADA+ children. Risk for diabetes was higher (P = 0.03) among multiple AAB+ who were also oxPTM‐INS‐Ab+ compared with those who were oxPTM‐INS‐Ab–. Importantly, when replacing IAA with oxPTM‐INS‐Ab, diabetes risk increased to 100% in children with oxPTM‐INS‐Ab+ in combination with GADA+ and IA‐2A+, compared with 84.37% in those with IAA+, GADA+, and IA‐2A+ (P = 0.04).ConclusionsAntibodies to oxidized insulin (oxPTM‐INS‐Ab), compared with IAA which measure autoantibodies to native insulin, improve T1D risk assessment and prediction accuracy in AAB+ children.
|
|
| 6. |
- Strollo, Rocky, et al.
(författare)
-
Antibodies to post-translationally modified insulin as a novel biomarker for prediction of type 1 diabetes in children
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Diabetologia. - : SPRINGER. - 0012-186X .- 1432-0428. ; 60:8, s. 1467-1474
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims/hypothesis We have shown that autoimmunity to insulin in type 1 diabetes may result from neoepitopes induced by oxidative post-translational modifications (oxPTM). Antibodies specific to oxPTM-insulin (oxPTM-INS-Ab) are present in most newly diagnosed individuals with type 1 diabetes and are more common than autoantibodies to native insulin. In this study, we investigated whether oxPTM-INS-Ab are present before clinical onset of type 1 diabetes, and evaluated the ability of oxPTM-INS-Ab to identify children progressing to type 1 diabetes. Methods We used serum samples collected longitudinally from the All Babies in Southeast Sweden (ABIS) cohort tested for the gold standard islet autoantibodies to insulin (IAA), GAD (GADA), tyrosine phosphatase 2 (IA-2A) and zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A). We studied 23 children who progressed to type 1 diabetes (progr-T1D) and 63 children who did not progress to type 1 diabetes (NP) after a median follow-up of 10.8 years (interquartile range 7.7-12.8). Of the latter group, 32 were positive for one or more islet autoantibodies (NP-AAB(+)). oxPTM-INS-Ab to insulinmodified by (OH)-O-center dot or HOCl were measured by our developed ELISA platform. Results Antibodies to at least one oxPTM-INS were present in 91.3% of progr-T1D children. oxPTM-INS-Ab co-existed with GADA, IA-2A, IAA or ZnT8A in 65.2%, 56.5%, 38.9% and 33.3% progr-T1D children, respectively. In addition, oxPTM-INS-Ab were present in 17.4%, 26.1%, 38.9% and 41.6% of progr-T1D children who were negative for GADA, IA-2A, IAA and ZnT8A, respectively. (OH)-O-center dot-INS-Ab were more common in progr-T1D children than in NP-AAB+ children (82.6% vs 19%; p amp;lt; 0.001) and allowed discrimination between progr-T1D and NP-AAB(+) children with 74% sensitivity and 91% specificity. None of the NP-AAB(-) children were positive for oxPTM-INS-Ab. Conclusions/interpretation oxPTM-INS-Ab are present before the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes and can identify children progressing to type 1 diabetes.
|
|
