SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Nordström O) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Nordström O)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 70
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Kanis, J A, et al. (författare)
  • Previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.
  • 2023
  • Ingår i: Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. - : Springer Nature. - 1433-2965 .- 0937-941X. ; 34:12, s. 2027-2045
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • A large international meta-analysis using primary data from 64 cohorts has quantified the increased risk of fracture associated with a previous history of fracture for future use in FRAX.The aim of this study was to quantify the fracture risk associated with a prior fracture on an international basis and to explore the relationship of this risk with age, sex, time since baseline and bone mineral density (BMD).We studied 665,971 men and 1,438,535 women from 64 cohorts in 32 countries followed for a total of 19.5 million person-years. The effect of a prior history of fracture on the risk of any clinical fracture, any osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture alone was examined using an extended Poisson model in each cohort. Covariates examined were age, sex, BMD, and duration of follow-up. The results of the different studies were merged by using the weighted β-coefficients.A previous fracture history, compared with individuals without a prior fracture, was associated with a significantly increased risk of any clinical fracture (hazard ratio, HR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.72-2.07). The risk ratio was similar for the outcome of osteoporotic fracture (HR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.69-2.07), major osteoporotic fracture (HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.63-2.06), or for hip fracture (HR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.62-2.06). There was no significant difference in risk ratio between men and women. Subsequent fracture risk was marginally downward adjusted when account was taken of BMD. Low BMD explained a minority of the risk for any clinical fracture (14%), osteoporotic fracture (17%), and for hip fracture (33%). The risk ratio for all fracture outcomes related to prior fracture decreased significantly with adjustment for age and time since baseline examination.A previous history of fracture confers an increased risk of fracture of substantial importance beyond that explained by BMD. The effect is similar in men and women. Its quantitation on an international basis permits the more accurate use of this risk factor in case finding strategies.
  •  
2.
  • Vandenput, L., et al. (författare)
  • A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: Osteoporosis International. - : Springer Nature. - 0937-941X .- 1433-2965. ; 35:3, s. 469-494
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Summary: The relationship between self-reported falls and fracture risk was estimated in an international meta-analysis of individual-level data from 46 prospective cohorts. Previous falls were associated with an increased fracture risk in women and men and should be considered as an additional risk factor in the FRAX® algorithm. Introduction: Previous falls are a well-documented risk factor for subsequent fracture but have not yet been incorporated into the FRAX algorithm. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in an international meta-analysis, the association between previous falls and subsequent fracture risk and its relation to sex, age, duration of follow-up, and bone mineral density (BMD). Methods: The resource comprised 906,359 women and men (66.9% female) from 46 prospective cohorts. Previous falls were uniformly defined as any fall occurring during the previous year in 43 cohorts; the remaining three cohorts had a different question construct. The association between previous falls and fracture risk (any clinical fracture, osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture) was examined using an extension of the Poisson regression model in each cohort and each sex, followed by random-effects meta-analyses of the weighted beta coefficients. Results: Falls in the past year were reported in 21.4% of individuals. During a follow-up of 9,102,207 person-years, 87,352 fractures occurred of which 19,509 were hip fractures. A previous fall was associated with a significantly increased risk of any clinical fracture both in women (hazard ratio (HR) 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33–1.51) and men (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.41–1.67). The HRs were of similar magnitude for osteoporotic, major osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture. Sex significantly modified the association between previous fall and fracture risk, with predictive values being higher in men than in women (e.g., for major osteoporotic fracture, HR 1.53 (95% CI 1.27–1.84) in men vs. HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.20–1.45) in women, P for interaction = 0.013). The HRs associated with previous falls decreased with age in women and with duration of follow-up in men and women for most fracture outcomes. There was no evidence of an interaction between falls and BMD for fracture risk. Subsequent risk for a major osteoporotic fracture increased with each additional previous fall in women and men. Conclusions: A previous self-reported fall confers an increased risk of fracture that is largely independent of BMD. Previous falls should be considered as an additional risk factor in future iterations of FRAX to improve fracture risk prediction. 
  •  
3.
  • Vandenput, Liesbeth, 1974, et al. (författare)
  • Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX : a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan
  • 2022
  • Ingår i: Osteoporosis International. - : Springer. - 0937-941X .- 1433-2965. ; 33:10, s. 2103-2136
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Summary: We describe the collection of cohorts together with the analysis plan for an update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX with respect to current and novel risk factors. The resource comprises 2,138,428 participants with a follow-up of approximately 20 million person-years and 116,117 documented incident major osteoporotic fractures.Introduction: The availability of the fracture risk assessment tool FRAX® has substantially enhanced the targeting of treatment to those at high risk of fracture with FRAX now incorporated into more than 100 clinical osteoporosis guidelines worldwide. The aim of this study is to determine whether the current algorithms can be further optimised with respect to current and novel risk factors.Methods: A computerised literature search was performed in PubMed from inception until May 17, 2019, to identify eligible cohorts for updating the FRAX coefficients. Additionally, we searched the abstracts of conference proceedings of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, European Calcified Tissue Society and World Congress of Osteoporosis. Prospective cohort studies with data on baseline clinical risk factors and incident fractures were eligible.Results: Of the 836 records retrieved, 53 were selected for full-text assessment after screening on title and abstract. Twelve cohorts were deemed eligible and of these, 4 novel cohorts were identified. These cohorts, together with 60 previously identified cohorts, will provide the resource for constructing an updated version of FRAX comprising 2,138,428 participants with a follow-up of approximately 20 million person-years and 116,117 documented incident major osteoporotic fractures. For each known and candidate risk factor, multivariate hazard functions for hip fracture, major osteoporotic fracture and death will be tested using extended Poisson regression. Sex- and/or ethnicity-specific differences in the weights of the risk factors will be investigated. After meta-analyses of the cohort-specific beta coefficients for each risk factor, models comprising 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture, with or without femoral neck bone mineral density, will be computed.Conclusions: These assembled cohorts and described models will provide the framework for an updated FRAX tool enabling enhanced assessment of fracture risk (PROSPERO (CRD42021227266)).
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Andersson, Martin O., et al. (författare)
  • Molecular detection of Babesia capreoli and Babesia venatorum in wild Swedish roe deer, Capreolus capreolus
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: Parasites & Vectors. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1756-3305. ; 9:1
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: The epidemiology of the zoonotic tick-transmitted parasite Babesia spp. and its occurrence in wild reservoir hosts in Sweden is unclear. In European deer, several parasite species, including Babesia capreoli and the zoonotic B. venatorum and B. divergens has been reported previously. The European roe deer, Capreolus capreolus, is an important and common part of the indigenous fauna in Europe, as well as an important host for Ixodes ricinus ticks, the vector of several Babesia spp. in Europe. Here, we aimed to investigate the occurrence of Babesia spp. in roe deer in Sweden. Findings: Roe deer (n = 77) were caught and sampled for blood. Babesia spp. was detected with a PCR assay targeting the 18S rRNA gene. The prevalence of Babesia spp. was 52 %, and two species were detected; B. capreoli and B. venatorum in 44 and 7.8 % of the individuals, respectively. Infection occurred both in summer and winter. Conclusions: We showed that roe deer in Sweden, close to the edge of their northern inland distributional range, are infected with Babesia spp. The occurrence of B. venatorum in roe deer imply that it is established in Sweden and the zoonotic implication of this finding should be regarded to a greater extent in future.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 70
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (34)
rapport (16)
konferensbidrag (12)
annan publikation (4)
bokkapitel (3)
forskningsöversikt (1)
visa fler...
visa färre...
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (40)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (30)
Författare/redaktör
Nordström, O (14)
Nordström, Lars (8)
Gustafsson, M. (6)
Nordström, L (6)
Nordström, Jan (5)
Nordström, B. (5)
visa fler...
Eriksson, O (5)
Dunham, Eric M. (5)
Nordström, K (5)
Di Marco, Igor (5)
Asplund, L (5)
Gällmo, O (5)
Nordström, E (5)
Brändén, C. I. (4)
Eriksson, Olle, 1960 ... (4)
Nordström, T (4)
Jones, G. (3)
Johansson, H (3)
Wareham, N. J. (3)
Harvey, N. C. (3)
Kanis, J. A. (3)
Zwart, M (3)
Fujita, Y. (3)
Nordström, Carl-Henr ... (3)
Lippuner, K (3)
Ferrari, S (3)
Hall, J (3)
Gudnason, V (3)
Ohlsson, Claes, 1965 (3)
Cooper, C. (3)
Eriksson, Olle (3)
Rivadeneira, F (3)
McCloskey, E. V. (3)
Vila, J (3)
Liu, E. (3)
Mellström, Dan, 1945 (3)
Sund, R (3)
Langhammer, A. (3)
Lantz, A (3)
Katsnelson, M I (3)
Cummings, S. R. (3)
O'Neill, T. W. (3)
Larijani, B (3)
Yoshimura, N (3)
Kwok, T. (3)
Bergman, Anders, 197 ... (3)
Nordström, Anna (3)
Åkesson, K. E. (3)
Hans, D (3)
Huisman, M (3)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Uppsala universitet (20)
VTI - Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut (14)
Lunds universitet (10)
Karolinska Institutet (9)
Linköpings universitet (7)
Göteborgs universitet (5)
visa fler...
Umeå universitet (5)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (5)
Jönköping University (5)
Stockholms universitet (2)
Mittuniversitetet (2)
Linnéuniversitetet (2)
Högskolan i Gävle (1)
Örebro universitet (1)
Chalmers tekniska högskola (1)
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (60)
Svenska (10)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Naturvetenskap (22)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (12)
Teknik (2)
Samhällsvetenskap (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy