| 1. |
- Cashin, Peter, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Peritoneal mesothelioma in Sweden : A population-based study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Cancer Medicine. - : Wiley. - 2045-7634. ; 8:14, s. 6468-6475
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The study aim was to report survival and morbidity of all patients in Sweden with peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as well as investigate whether the survival has increased on a population level since this treatment was nationalized 2011. Study data were collected from the Swedish HIPEC registry and the Swedish National Cancer Registry. All patients with peritoneal mesothelioma scheduled for CRS/HIPEC treatment in Sweden January 2011 to March 2018 were retrieved from the Swedish HIPEC registry. Clinicopathological and survival data were collected. For population-level analysis, all patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) were identified from the Swedish National Cancer Registry and data were retrieved from two separate 5-year time periods: 1999-2003 and 2011-2015. Thirty-two patients were accepted for CRS/HIPEC. Four were open/close cases. Two-year survival rate was 84% or 59% when excluding borderline peritoneal mesotheliomas (n = 17). Median overall survival was not reached. Grade III-IV Clavien-Dindo events occurred in 22% with no mortality. From the national cancer registry, 102 DMPM cases were retrieved: 40 cases between 1999 and 2003, and 62 cases between 2011 and 2015 (corresponding to an increase from 0.9 to 1.24/million/year, P =.04). Six patients (10%) received CRS/HIPEC in the second period. Median OS increased between periods from 7 to 15 months and 5-year survival from 14% to 29% (P =.03). Peritoneal mesothelioma of both borderline and DMPM subtypes undergoing CRS/HIPEC have good long-term survival. The incidence of DMPM in Sweden has increased. Overall survival has increased alongside the introduction of CRS/HIPEC, which may be a contributing factor.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ghanipour, Lana, et al.
(författare)
-
Efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer : A phase I and III open label randomized controlled registry-based clinical trial protocol
- 2024
-
Ingår i: PLOS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 19:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Standard treatment for patient with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). In recent years, the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC has been challenged. An intensified HIPEC (oxaliplatin+irinotecan) in combination with early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) has shown increased recurrence-free survival in retrospective studies. The aim of this trial is to develop a new HIPEC/EPIC regimen and evaluate its effect on morbidity, oncological outcome, and quality-of-life (QoL). This study is designed as a combined phase I/III multicenter randomized trial (RCT) of patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer eligible for CRS-HIPEC. An initial phase I dose escalation study, designed as a 3+3 stepwise escalation, will determine the maximum tolerable dose of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as 1-day EPIC, enrolling a total of 15–30 patients in 5 dose levels. In the phase III efficacy study, patients are randomly assigned intraoperatively to either the standard treatment with oxaliplatin HIPEC (control arm) or oxaliplatin/irinotecan-HIPEC in combination with single dose of 1-day 5-FU EPIC (experimental arm). 5-FU is administered intraoperatively after CRS-HIPEC and closure of the abdomen. The primary endpoint is 12-month recurrence-free survival. Secondary endpoints include 5-year overall survival, 5-year recurrence-free survival (registry based), postoperative complications, and QoL up to 3 years after study treatment. This phase I/III trial aims to identify a more effective treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases by combination of HIPEC and EPIC.
|
|
| 3. |
- Günaydin, Gökce, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of Q-Griffithsin anti-HIV microbicide gel in non-human primates : In situ analyses of epithelial and immune cell markers in rectal mucosa
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Scientific Reports. - : NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP. - 2045-2322. ; 9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Natural-product derived lectins can function as potent viral inhibitors with minimal toxicity as shown in vitro and in small animal models. We here assessed the effect of rectal application of an anti-HIV lectin-based microbicide Q-Griffithsin (Q-GRFT) in rectal tissue samples from rhesus macaques. E-cadherin(+) cells, CD4(+) cells and total mucosal cells were assessed using in situ staining combined with a novel customized digital image analysis platform. Variations in cell numbers between baseline, placebo and Q-GRFT treated samples were analyzed using random intercept linear mixed effect models. The frequencies of rectal E-cadherin(+) cells remained stable despite multiple tissue samplings and Q-GRFT gel (0.1%, 0.3% and 1%, respectively) treatment. Whereas single dose application of Q-GRFT did not affect the frequencies of rectal CD4(+) cells, multi-dose Q-GRFT caused a small, but significant increase of the frequencies of intra-epithelial CD4(+) cells (placebo: median 4%; 1% Q-GRFT: median 7%) and of the CD4(+) lamina propria cells (placebo: median 30%; 0.1-1% Q-GRFT: median 36-39%). The resting time between sampling points were further associated with minor changes in the total and CD4(+) rectal mucosal cell levels. The results add to general knowledge of in vivo evaluation of anti-HIV microbicide application concerning cellular effects in rectal mucosa.
|
|
| 4. |
- Jansson Palmer, Gabriella
(författare)
-
Locally advanced rectal cancer : aspects on management, outcome and quality of life
- 2009
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Rectal cancer is common in Sweden, with about 1650 patients diagnosed annually. In 10-15% of the patients the tumour is locally advanced at diagnosis, i.e. the cancer is growing outside the mesorectal fascia, into adjacent organs in the pelvis. The incidence of local recurrences, after surgery for primary rectal cancer has decreased as a result of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and improved surgical techniques, but still the local failure rate is 5-15%. Treatment of patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer and recurrent rectal cancer remains a challenge but, with radical surgical resection 5-year survival rates up to 50-60% is reached at dedicated centres. The aim of this thesis was to analyse management, outcome and the quality of life in patients with both locally advanced primary rectal cancer and locally recurrent rectal cancer, focusing on the preoperative assessment and on multimodality treatment with a multidisciplinary approach. Two of the studies were population-based and included all patients in the Stockholm-Gotland region with respectively locally advanced primary rectal cancer and local recurrences during 1995-2005. The patients were identified by means of the colorectal cancer registry at the Regional Oncological Centre and their medical records were scrutinised. The other two studies involved patients with locally advanced rectal cancer at a single centre, the Karolinska University Hospital, and treated during 1991-2003. During 1995-2004 in the Stockholm region, 10% of all rectal cancer patients were found to have a locally advanced primary rectal cancer. In all patients with a potentially curative resection of primary rectal cancer treated during 1995-2003, a local recurrence of rectal cancer was detected in 6% by 2005. It was concluded that appropriate preoperative radiological tumour staging in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer increased both the proportion of patients who received neo-adjuvant treatment and the rate of potentially curative resections. Local control and survival were improved. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions further enhanced the proportion of curative resections and local control, but no influence on survival was seen. The overall outcome for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer was dismal, with a 5-year survival of 9%, but, in patients with a potentially curative resection, an improved estimated 5-year survival of 57% was obtained. A radical resection was necessary for cure and the proportion of curative resections had increased after improved preoperative management and refined surgery compared to an earlier study of local recurrences in Stockholm. After the introduction of a multimodality treatment programme for patients with rectal cancer, one third of the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer could be cured if a radical resection was performed. Patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer had a higher rate of curative resections than patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. The extensive surgery and RT led to a high morbidity. In measurements of the quality of life in disease-free patients treated for locally advanced rectal cancer several functions, such as role, social and physical function, were low compared with patients treated for primary resectable rectal cancer. This knowledge is valuable for counselling patients preoperatively and for giving adequate postoperative support. In conclusion, the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer can be further improved with adequate preoperative evaluation and staging and increased preoperative neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by extensive surgery. The survival gain of additional adjuvant therapy remains to be studied. Multidisciplinary management of these patients is necessary.
|
|
| 5. |
- Klionsky, Daniel J., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
|
|
| 6. |
- Ljunggren, Malin, et al.
(författare)
-
Hospital factors and metastatic surgery in colorectal cancer patients, a population-based cohort study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: BMC Cancer. - : Springer Nature. - 1471-2407 .- 1471-2407. ; 22
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Only a limited proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receives metastatic surgery (including local ablative therapy). The aim was to investigate whether hospital volume and hospital level were associated with the chance of metastatic surgery.Methods: This national cohort retrieved from the CRCBaSe linkage included all Swedish adult patients diagnosed with synchronous mCRC in 2009-2016. The association between annual hospital volume of incident mCRC patients and the chance of metastatic surgery, and survival, were assessed using logistic regression and Cox regression models, respectively. Hospital level (university/non-university) was evaluated as a secondary exposure in a similar manner. Both uni- and multivariable (adjusted for sex, age, Charlson comorbidity index, year of diagnosis, cancer characteristics and socioeconomic factors) models were fitted.Results: A total of 1,674 (17%) out of 9,968 mCRC patients had metastatic surgery. High hospital volume was not associated with increased odds of metastatic surgery after including hospital level in the model, whereas hospital level was (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 1.94 (1.68-2.24)). All-cause mortality was lower in university versus non-university hospitals (hazard ratio (95% CI): 0.83 (0.78-0.88)).Conclusions: Patients with mCRC initially cared for by a university hospital experienced a greater chance to receive metastatic surgery and had superior overall survival. High hospital volume in itself was not associated with a greater chance to receive metastatic surgery nor a greater survival probability. Additional efforts should be imposed to provide more equal care for mCRC patients across Swedish hospitals.
|
|
| 7. |
- Ljunggren, Malin, et al.
(författare)
-
Sex differences in metastatic surgery following diagnosis of synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cancer. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0020-7136 .- 1097-0215. ; 152:3, s. 363-373
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim was to investigate gender differences in the likelihood to receive metastatic surgery, and to compare overall survival between men and women, among patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a population-based setting. All Swedish adult patients diagnosed with synchronous mCRC in 2007-2016 were identified using the nationwide colorectal cancer database (CRCBaSe). Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression, comparing the odds of receiving treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival proportions and Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of all-cause mortality rates. All multivariable models were adjusted for age, ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index, year of diagnosis, location of primary tumor and single or multiple metastatic locations. A total of 12 201 patients met the study criteria. Women received 23% less metastatic surgery for mCRC (adjusted OR = 0.77, CI:0.69-0.86) and experienced a slightly higher mortality following diagnosis (adjusted HR = 1.09, CI:1.05-1.14). In analyses restricted to patients who received metastatic surgery, no significant differences in mortality were found. In conclusion, this population-based study showed that women less often received metastatic surgery of mCRC and experienced slightly higher all-cause mortality compared with men. The differences persisted despite adjustments of patient and cancer characteristics. Gender differences in receiving treatment are unacceptable if the underlying explanation cannot be motivated. Further studies are needed to understand if the differences are based on sex (i.e., biology) or gender (including clinically unmotivated differences in treatment approach).
|
|
| 8. |
- Suzuki, Chikako, et al.
(författare)
-
The importance of rectal cancer MRI protocols on interpretation accuracy
- 2008
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1477-7819. ; 6, s. 89-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for preoperative local staging in patients with rectal cancer. Our aim was to retrospectively study the effects of the imaging protocol on the staging accuracy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MR-examinations of 37 patients with locally advanced disease were divided into two groups; compliant and noncompliant, based on the imaging protocol, without knowledge of the histopathological results. A compliant rectal cancer imaging protocol was defined as including T2-weighted imaging in the sagittal and axial planes with supplementary coronal in low rectal tumors, alongside a high-resolution plane perpendicular to the rectum at the level of the primary tumor. Protocols not complying with these criteria were defined as noncompliant. Histopathological results were used as gold standard. RESULTS: Compliant rectal imaging protocols showed significantly better correlation with histopathological results regarding assessment of anterior organ involvement (sensitivity and specificity rates in compliant group were 86% and 94%, respectively vs. 50% and 33% in the noncompliant group). Compliant imaging protocols also used statistically significantly smaller voxel sizes and fewer number of MR sequences than the noncompliant protocols CONCLUSION: Appropriate MR imaging protocols enable more accurate local staging of locally advanced rectal tumors with less number of sequences and without intravenous gadolinium contrast agents.
|
|
