| 1. |
- Bell, Mark, et al.
(författare)
-
Equal Treatment
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Labour Law. - 9781780687049 ; , s. 131-200
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
-
European Citizenship and Social Rights: Entitlements and Impediments to Accessing Welfare
- 2018
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In the 1990s, the Maastricht Treaty introduced the right to free movement for EU citizens. In practice, however, there are substantial barriers to making use of this right, particularly to integration and to accessing the social and welfare rights available. This is particularly true when it comes to accessing social rights, such as social assistance, housing benefit, study grants and health care. This book provides a detailed description and thorough analysis of these barriers, in both law and practice.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Pennings, Frans
(författare)
-
Different Levels of Standard-Setting: Analysis
- 2013
-
Ingår i: International Standard-Setting and Innovations in Social Security. - Alphen a/d Rijn : Kluwer Law International. - 9789041132338
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 7. |
- Pennings, Frans
(författare)
-
Different Levels of Standard-Setting: Introduction
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Ulrich Becker, Frans Pennings and Tineke Dijkhoff (red), International Standard-Setting and Innovations in Social Security. - Alphen a/d Rijn : Kluwer Law International. - 9789041132338
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
- Pennings, Frans
(författare)
-
EU Citizenship: Access to Social Benefits in Other EU Member States
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations. - 0952-617X. ; 28:3, s. 307-333
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- As the result of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on EU citizenship provisions, even citizens who are not economically active have access to social benefits in a country other than that of origin. Is it justified to connect such effects to EU citizenship, even though EU citizenship does not yet have an identity of its own? In this contribution the case law is analysed and it is argued that because of the objective justification that Member States can still offer for limiting access to their systems, more precisely by the link they may require between the claimant and their community, the case law fits well in the system for achieving the free movement of persons. This ‘link approach’ is a better explanation for the consistency of the case law than an explanation based on cross-border solidarity or a special identity relating to EU citizenship.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Pennings, Frans
(författare)
-
Non-Discrimination on the Ground of Nationality in Social Security: What are the Consequences of the Accession of the EU to the ECHR?
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Utrecht Law Review. - : Utrecht University School of Law. - 1871-515X. ; 9:1, s. 118-134
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU have both developed their own approach to discrimination on the ground of nationality. The context of both approaches is very different and therefore it is not surprising that they diverge considerably. Because of the expected adherence of the EU to the ECHR it is important to analyse these divergences. This contribution describes the case law of both courts in detail, and pays attention to the differences in approach between EU nationals and third-country nationals. It also analyses the differences in approach in respect of direct and indirect discrimination. Finally, the contribution summarises the areas where differences in approach are most likely to appear.
|
|
