| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Heittola, Sanna, et al.
(författare)
-
TNC och Finland. Korrespondens inom terminologiområdet 1940–1999
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Svenskan i Finland 19. Föredrag vid den nittonde sammankomsten för beskrivningen av svenskan i Finland, Vasa 6–7 maj 2021. Red. Siv Björklund, Bodil Haagensen, Marianne Nordman och Anders Westerlund. - Vasa : Åbo Akademi/Svensk-Österbottniska Samfundet. - 2489-4338 .- 2489-4346. - 9789526965048
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Landqvist, Hans, 1958, et al.
(författare)
-
Ingenjörer, termer och begrepp. Elektroteknikföretaget Aseas insatser inom ett svenskt terminologiskt nätverk 1941–1983
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Työelämän viestintä III, Arbetslivskommunikation III, Workplace Communication III, Kommunikation im Berufsleben III. VAKKI Symposium XL 6.–7.2.2020, toim./red./eds/Hrsg Heidi Hirsto, Mona Enell-Nilsson, Hannele Kauppinen-Räisänen, Nicole Keng, VAKKI Publications 12. - 2242-6841 .- 2242-685X. ; :12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this paper, we study how Allmänna Svenska Elektriska Aktiebolaget – Asea has participated in and influenced terminology work coordinated by the national terminology centre, Swedish Centre for Technical Terminology – TNC, in Sweden during 1941–1983. The aim of this paper is to shed light on the development of Swedish (technical) terminology based on networking and experts’ efforts. Based on archive material, we analyze who have been the active “Asea experts”, in what ways they were involved in the development processes and what effects their efforts had on the term recommendations given by TNC. The archive material consists of written documents relating to the work process developed by John Wennerberg, who led TNC between 1941 and 1957. The process was carried out in the form of 373 formal survey letters representing 16 subject fields, with both TNC and external parties participating. Our results show that the 52 “Asea experts” play a visible role in the processes by 408 received survey letters within all 16 subject fields. The high response rate, 89.5 %, reveal the experts’ involvement in the process and their high esteem of TNC´s work. The analysis of the comprehensive survey letter R198 shows that Wennerberg has considered the experts’ answers regarding terms (selection, linguistic form, acceptance/discourage) and definitions when he has published TNC’s recommendations. Our study shows that networking and experts representing the corporate sector have been an inseparable part of the development of Swedish (technical) terminology during several decades.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Landqvist, Hans, 1958, et al.
(författare)
-
Intresse och engagemang: Kungliga Tekniska högskolans insatser i ett svenskt terminologiskt nätverk 1941–1983 : Interest and involvement: the contributions of the Royal Institute of Technology to a Swedish terminological network 1941–1983
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Folkmålsstudier Meddelanden från Föreningen för nordisk filologi. - 0356-1771. ; 59, s. 103-133
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this paper, we study how KTH Royal Institute of Technology (Kungliga Tekniska högskolan – KTH) has participated in and influenced terminology work coordinated by the national terminology centre, the Swedish Centre for Technical Terminology – the TNC, in Sweden during the period 1941–1983. The aim of this paper is to shed light on the development of Swedish (technical) terminology based on networking and experts’ efforts. Based on archive material, we analyze who have been the active KTH experts, in what ways they were involved in the development processes and what effects their efforts had on the term recommendations given by the TNC. The archive material consists of written documents relating to the work process developed by John Wennerberg, who led the TNC between 1941 and 1957. The process was carried out in the form of 373 formal survey letters representing 17 subject fields, with both the TNC and external parties participating. Our results show that the 31 identified KTH experts play a visible role in the processes by 480 received survey letters within 14 subject fields. The response rate, 80 percent, reveal the experts’ involvement in the process and their high esteem of TNC’s work. The analysis of the comprehensive survey letter R198 shows that Wennerberg has considered the experts’ answers regarding terms (selection, linguistic form, acceptance/discourage) and definitions when he has published TNC’s recommendations. Our study shows that networking and experts representing the educational sector and furthermore universities have been an inseparable part of the development of Swedish (technical) terminology during several decades when the national terminology centre in Sweden began to operate and the working methods were established.
|
|
| 10. |
- Landqvist, Hans, 1958, et al.
(författare)
-
(O)lika? Två experters verksamhet inom ett terminologiskt nätverk
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Kääntä, Liisa, Mona Enell-Nilsson & Nicole Keng (utg.), Työelämän viestintä, Arbetslivskommunikation, Workplace Communication, Kommunikation im Berufsleben. VAKKI-symposiumi XXXVIII. Vaasa 8.—9.2.2018. - Vaasa : Vaasan yliopisto. - 2242-6841 .- 2242-685X. - 9789526853857
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Tämä tutkimus tarkastelee yhden alan asiantuntijan ja yhden kieliasiantuntijan osallistumista omakielisten käsitteiden ja termien valintaan ja vakiinnuttamiseen Ruotsin kansallisen terminologiakeskuksen toiminnassa 1940‒1983. Vertaamme asiantuntijoiden kommentointia määrällisesti ja laadullisesti induktiivisen luokittelun pohjalta. Aineisto koostuu kirjemuotoisista asiantuntijalausunnoista, joiden pohjalta Tekniska Nomenklaturcentralen (TNC) on antanut alakohtaisia suosituksiaan. Tutkimuksen tulokset osoittavat, että molemmat asiantuntijat ovat aktiivisia toimijoita lausuntoprosessissa. Kemian alan insinööri Halvard Liander on vastaanottanut 73 ja pohjoismaisten kielten professori Gösta Bergman 84 pyyntöä, joista he ovat jättäneet vastaamatta vain muutaman. Vastausten sisällön tarkastelu osoittaa, että 36 % Lianderin ja 51 % Bergmanin vastauksista kuuluu pääkategoriaan Enkla svar siinä merkityksessä, että niissä hyväksytään annetut ehdotukset, ei oteta kantaa, kerrotaan mielipide parhaasta vaihtoehdosta tai ei ole huomauttamista. Bergman hyväksyy annetut ehdotukset useammin kuin Liander. Sisällöltään kattavammissa pääkategoriassa Utvecklade svar molemmat asiantuntijat pohtivat vastauksissaan useimmiten kielenkäyttöä. Bergman ottaa useammin kantaa kieleen järjestelmänä ja Liander puolestaan kielenvälityksen aspekteihin eli esim. termivastineisiin.
|
|
