| 1. |
- Dobbins, Sara E., et al.
(författare)
-
Common variation at 10p12.31 near MLLT10 influences meningioma risk
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Nature Genetics. - London : Nature America, Inc.. - 1061-4036 .- 1546-1718. ; 43:9, s. 825-827
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To identify susceptibility loci for meningioma, we conducted a genome-wide association study of 859 affected individuals (cases) and 704 controls with validation in two independent sample sets totaling 774 cases and 1,764 controls. We identified a new susceptibility locus for meningioma at 10p12.31 (MLLT10, rs11012732, odds ratio = 1.46, P(combined) = 1.88 x 10(-14)). This finding advances our understanding of the genetic basis of meningioma development.
|
|
| 2. |
- Shete, Sanjay, et al.
(författare)
-
Genome-wide association study identifies five susceptibility loci for glioma.
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Nature Genetics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1061-4036 .- 1546-1718. ; 41:8, s. 899-904
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To identify risk variants for glioma, we conducted a meta-analysis of two genome-wide association studies by genotyping 550K tagging SNPs in a total of 1,878 cases and 3,670 controls, with validation in three additional independent series totaling 2,545 cases and 2,953 controls. We identified five risk loci for glioma at 5p15.33 (rs2736100, TERT; P = 1.50 x 10(-17)), 8q24.21 (rs4295627, CCDC26; P = 2.34 x 10(-18)), 9p21.3 (rs4977756, CDKN2A-CDKN2B; P = 7.24 x 10(-15)), 20q13.33 (rs6010620, RTEL1; P = 2.52 x 10(-12)) and 11q23.3 (rs498872, PHLDB1; P = 1.07 x 10(-8)). These data show that common low-penetrance susceptibility alleles contribute to the risk of developing glioma and provide insight into disease causation of this primary brain tumor.
|
|
| 3. |
- Shinar, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Reporting bicycle accidents to police in the COST TU1101 survey data base: Cross-country comparisons and associated factors
- 2016
-
Ingår i: ; , s. 9-9
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Police crash reports are often the main source for official data in many countries. However, police sampling and data are known to be subject to bias, making the countermeasures adopted according to them possibly inefficient. In the case of bicycle crashes, this bias is most acute and it probably varies across countries, with some of them being more prone to reporting accidents to police than others. Assessing if this bias occurs and the size of it can be of great importance for evaluating the risks associated with bicycling. The following paper utilizes data collected in the COST TU1101 action. The data came from an online survey that included questions related with bicyclists' attitudes, accidents, and pattern of use of helmets. An average of only 10% of all crashes were reported to the police (minimum of 0.0% Israel and 3.37% Greece to a maximum of a 30% of Germany). Some factors associated with the reporting level were: type of crash, type of vehicle and injury severity. Finally, no relation was found between the likelihood of reporting and the cyclist's gender, age, use of helmet, and type of bicycle. The significant under-reporting justifies the use of survey data for assessment of bicycling crash patterns as they relate to crash risk issues such as location, cyclists' characteristics, and use of helmet and strategic approaches to bicycle crash prevention and injury reduction, which are discussed in the paper.
|
|
| 4. |
- Shinar, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Under-reporting bicycle accidents to police in the COST TU1101 international survey: Cross-country comparisons and associated factors
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Accident Analysis and Prevention. - : Elsevier BV. - 0001-4575. ; 110, s. 177-186
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Police crash reports are often the main source for official data in many countries. However, with the exception of fatal crashes, crashes are often underreported in a biased manner. Consequently, the countermeasures adopted according to them may be inefficient. In the case of bicycle crashes, this bias is most acute and it probably varies across countries, with some of them being more prone to reporting accidents to police than others. Assessing if this bias occurs and the size of it can be of great importance for evaluating the risks associated with bicycling.This study utilized data collected in the COST TU1101 action “Towards safer bicycling through optimization of bicycle helmets and usage”. The data came from an online survey that included questions related to bicyclists' attitudes, behaviour, cycling habits, accidents, and patterns of use of helmets. The survey was filled by 8655 bicyclists from 30 different countries. After applying various exclusion factors, 7015 questionnaires filled by adult cyclists from 17 countries, each with at least 100 valid responses, remained in our sample.The results showed that across all countries, an average of only 10% of all crashes were reported to the police, with a wide range among countries: from a minimum of 0.0% (Israel) and 2.6% (Croatia) to a maximum of a 35.0% (Germany). Some factors associated with the reporting levels were type of crash, type of vehicle involved, and injury severity. No relation was found between the likelihood of reporting and the cyclist's gender, age, educational level, marital status, being a parent, use of helmet, and type of bicycle.The significant under-reporting – including injury crashes that do not lead to hospitalization – justifies the use of self-report survey data for assessment of bicycling crash patterns as they relate to (1) crash risk issues such as location, infrastructure, cyclists' characteristics, and use of helmet and (2) strategic approaches to bicycle crash prevention and injury reduction.
|
|
