| 1. |
- Andersson, Dennis, et al.
(författare)
-
Västlänken – en fråga om förtroende
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Hemma Väst. - Göteborg : SOM-institutet, Göteborgs universitet. - 0284-4788. ; , s. 129-144
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Arkhede, Sofia, 1990, et al.
(författare)
-
Mellanmänsklig tillit i en segregerad stad
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Andersson U. & Bergström A. (red) En brokig gemenskap. - 0284-4788. - 9789189673403
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Berg, Linda, 1973, et al.
(författare)
-
Tracing a political cleavage. The wolf issue in Sweden
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Politics and Society. - : Informa UK Limited. - 2374-5118 .- 2374-5126. ; 16:4, s. 488-522
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2009, Sweden allowed licensed wolf (canis lupus) hunting for the first time in 45 years. After record number of media attention and threat of legal action from the EU, the licenced hunt stopped, but protective hunting continued – as did the polarisation in public debate. This article will analyse how the wolf issue relates to the three main cleavage elements and to what extent the elements align. It provides an empirical investigation of the wolf issue, applying the three-step cleavage model on the 2010 Swedish National Election Study data. Our results show, first, that we can identify specific group features among persons with negative wolf attitudes (structural difference); second, that the wolf issue loads (if weakly) at a second non-economic dimension connecting to issues of self-determination and globalisation (attitudinal difference); and third, that this second dimension affects voting for the Greens and the Centre party (institutional difference). However, when controlling for both dimensions in the third step, the wolf issue alone has a lesser impact. Thus, the wolf issue may currently be seen as a so-called position divide, although with a future potential to serve as cleavage catalyst if mobilised in connection with aspects of self-determination and globalisation.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Bågenholm, Andreas, 1969, et al.
(författare)
-
Does Politicization of Corruption Affect Voter Turnout?
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 28-31 2014.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This paper tests to what extent voters’ perceptions of corruption in the political system affect turnout and in particular if politicization of corruption in electoral campaigns affects that relationship. In previous research, some studies find that corruption increases turnout because voters either are bought off to participate or because they are mobilized on clean government issues, but the majority, more often country comparative studies, show that corruption decreases turnout because the presence of corruption corrodes the political system which leads to general cynicism, distrust and voter apathy. In this paper, we test a previously neglected factor, namely if politicization of corruption, defined as any party campaigning on anti-corruption issues, dampens or even reverses the presumed negative effects of perceiving political corruption on turnout. We argue that it is reasonable to believe that people’s willingness to participate will increase if parties address this important issue in electoral campaigns, as it will indicate party responsiveness to voter concerns. We apply multilevel modeling combining individual-level data and country-level data from 20 countries from the second module of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, country-level data from the Quality of Government Data Set and a unique data set on politicization of corruption issues in the election campaign. The findings suggest that politicization of corruption in the election to some extent dampens the negative effect of corruption perceptions on turnout, as the obtained positive interaction effect indicates that the negative effect of perceiving corruption as a problem on turnout is reduced in an election context where corruption is politicized. The results thus show that if corruption is not politicized, the individual corruption perceptions exert a significant negative effect on voting.
|
|
