| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Van Den Heede, Klaas, et al.
(författare)
-
Surgery for advanced neuroendocrine tumours of the small bowel : recommendations based on a consensus meeting of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES)
- 2024
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 111:4
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.Methods A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023.Results The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants.Conclusion This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours. This paper provides evidence-based recommendations on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours, primary tumour resections in the setting of metastatic disease, and surgical indications for grade 3 small bowel neuroendocrine tumours and small bowel neuroendocrine carcinomas. The recommendations are the result of a working group of experts, created by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 relevant clinical questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, emphasizing and confirming the key role of the surgeon for advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.
|
|
| 3. |
- Crona, Joakim, et al.
(författare)
-
ENSAT registry-based randomized clinical trials for adrenocortical carcinoma
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Endocrinology. - : Bioscientifica. - 0804-4643 .- 1479-683X. ; 184:2, s. R51-R59
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an orphan disease lacking effective systemic treatment options. The low incidence of the disease and high cost of clinical trials are major obstacles in the search for improved treatment strategies. As a novel approach, registry-based clinical trials have been introduced in clinical research, so allowing for significant cost reduction, but without compromising scientific benefit. Herein, we describe how the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours (ENSAT) could transform its current registry into one fit for a clinical trial infrastructure. The rationale to perform randomized registry-based trials in ACC is outlined including an analysis of relevant limitations and challenges. We summarize a survey on this concept among ENSAT members who expressed a strong interest in the concept and rated its scientific potential as high. Legal aspects, including ethical approval of registry-based randomization were identified as potential obstacles. Finally, we describe three potential randomized registry-based clinical trials in an adjuvant setting and for advanced disease with a high potential to be executed within the framework of an advanced ENSAT registry. Thus we, therefore, provide the basis for future registry-based trials for ACC patients. This could ultimately provide proof-of-principle of how to perform more effective randomized trials for an orphan disease.
|
|
| 4. |
- Van Den Heede, Klaas, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of primary tumour resection without curative intent in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours of the small intestine and right colon : meta-analysis
- 2022
-
Ingår i: The British journal of surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1365-2168 .- 0007-1323. ; 109:2, s. 191-199
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (siNETs) usually present with advanced disease. Primary tumour resection without curative intent is controversial in patients with metastatic siNETs. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate survival after primary tumour resection without curative intent compared with no resection in patients with metastatic siNETs. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed, using MEDLINE® (PubMed), Embase®, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up to 25 February 2021. Studies were included if survival after primary tumour resection versus no resection in patients with metastatic siNETs was reported. Results were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis, and are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to enable comment on the impact of important confounders. RESULTS: After screening 3659 abstracts, 16 studies, published between 1992 and 2021, met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 9428 patients. Thirteen studies reported HRs adjusted for important confounders and were included in the meta-analysis. Median overall survival was 112 (i.q.r. 82-134) months in the primary tumour resection group compared with 60 (74-88) months in the group without resection. Five-year overall survival rates were 74 (i.q.r. 67-77) and 44 (34-45) per cent respectively. Primary tumour resection was associated with improved survival compared with no resection (HR 0.55, 95 per cent c.i. 0.47 to 0.66). This effect remained in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Primary tumour resection is associated with increased survival in patients with advanced, metastatic siNETs, even after adjusting for important confounders.
|
|
| 5. |
- Van Den Heede, Klaas, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term survival of metastatic small intestine neuroendocrine tumors : a meta-analysis
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Endocrine-Related Cancer. - 1479-6821. ; 29:3, s. 163-173
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the long-term survival and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic small intestine neuroendocrine tumors (siNETs). Patients with siNETs usually present with advanced disease, limiting curative treatment options. The overall survival seems favorable compared to other cancers, but differences in terminology, lack of consistent coding, conflicting results from smaller cohorts, and recent developments of new treatment options make (reliable) survival data difficult to achieve. Nevertheless, accurate survival data are essential for many facets of health care. A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE®(PubMed), EMBASE®, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to June 30, 2021. Studies were included if the overall survival data in patients with metastatic siNETs were reported. The results were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis and are reported as hazard ratios and 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to assess the observed heterogeneity and the impact of important prognostic factors. After screening 9065 abstracts, there were 23 studies, published between 1995 and 2021, that met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 8636 patients. The weighted 5- and 10-year overall survival was 67 and 37%, respectively. Meta-regression identified younger age and primary tumor resection to be associated with better prognosis. Subgroup analyses showed similar results. This study confirms that in an advanced, metastatic setting, the weighted 5- and 10-year overall survival reveal a favorable prognosis, improving over the last few decades. Meta-regression showed that age at diagnosis is an important prognostic factor.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Nomine-Criqui, Claire, et al.
(författare)
-
Role of hospital and patient factors in the outcome of reoperations for primary hyperparathyroidism : a retrospective multicenter cohort study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International journal of surgery (London, England). - 1743-9159. ; 109:11, s. 3441-3449
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: There are few data on outcomes after reintervention for persistent or recurrent primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). The authors hypothesized that the variation in outcomes at the hospital level after reoperation would be significant. After accounting for this variability, some patient-level clinical criteria could be identified to help inform treatment decisions in this patient population. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is significant variation in outcomes after reoperation for PHPT between hospitals (hospital-level analysis) and identify clinical factors (patient-level analysis) that influence postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed using the Eurocrine registry. Data from 11 countries and 76 hospitals from January 2015 to October 2020 were extracted. A generalized linear mixed model was used to assess the variation in outcomes at the hospital level and to identify risk factors of postoperative outcomes at the patient level. The primary endpoint (textbook outcome) was achieved when all six of the following postoperative conditions were met: no hypocalcemia or persistent hypercalcemia, no laryngeal nerve injury, no negative exploration, no normal parathyroid gland only on histopathology, and no postoperative death. RESULTS: Among 13 593 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy for PHPT, 617 (4.5%) underwent reoperative parathyroidectomy. At follow-up, 231 patients (37.4%) were hypocalcemic, 346 (56.1%) were normocalcemic without treatment, and 40 (6.5%) had persistent hypercalcemia. Textbook outcomes were achieved in 321 (52.0%) patients. The hospital-level variation in textbook outcome rates was significant ( P <0.001), and this variation could explain 29.1% of the observed outcomes. The criterion that remained significant after controlling for inter-hospital variation was 'a single lesion on sestamibi scan or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging' (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.24-3.48; P =0.005). CONCLUSION: Outcomes after reoperation are significantly associated with hospital-related factors. A 'single lesion observed on preoperative sestamibi scan or PET' appears relevant to select patients before reoperation.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Vatansever, Safa, et al.
(författare)
-
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy : Results from the EUROCRINE Surgical Registry
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Surgery (United States). - : Elsevier BV. - 0039-6060. ; 171:5, s. 1224-1230
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Adrenalectomy is routinely performed via the minimally invasive approach. Safety of adrenalectomy using the robot-assisted technique has been widely demonstrated by several series, but the literature is scarce regarding the comparison of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted approach. We decided to carry out a multicenter study to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study, including data from centers affiliated to the Surgical Registry EUROCRINE. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for adrenal tumors and registered between 2015 and 2018 were included. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy was compared. All comparisons were carried out in terms of complication rate, conversion rate and duration of stay. Results: A total of 1,005 patients from 46 clinics underwent robotic or conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Median age was 55 (interquartile range: 45−65) years. Robotic adrenalectomy was performed in 189 (18.8%) patients. According to Clavien-Dindo classification, complication rate was lower in the robotic surgery group (1.6% vs 16.5%, P <.001). Laparoscopic surgery and active hormonal status were significantly correlated with complications, both in univariate and multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference between laparoscopic and robotic surgery groups, in terms of conversion rate (2.1% vs 0.5%, respectively, P =.147). Duration of stay was shorter in the robotic adrenalectomy group (82.1% vs 28.8%, P <.001). Conclusion: Analysis of the EUROCRINE database supports that robotic adrenalectomy resulted in a lower complication rate and shorter duration of stay, compared with laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Granular data to support this is warranted.
|
|
