| 1. |
- Fored, C. M., et al.
(författare)
-
Acetaminophen, aspirin, and chronic renal failure
- 2001
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - Waltham, USA : Massachusetts Medical Society. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 345:25, s. 1801-1808
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Several epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an association between heavy consumption of nonnarcotic analgesics and the occurrence of chronic renal failure, but it is unclear which is the cause and which is the effect.Methods: In a nationwide, population-based, case-control study of early-stage chronic renal failure in Sweden, face-to-face interviews were conducted with 926 patients with newly diagnosed renal failure and 998 control subjects, of whom 918 and 980, respectively, had complete data. We used logistic-regression models to estimate the relative risks of disease-specific types of chronic renal failure associated with the use of various analgesics.Results: Aspirin and acetaminophen were used regularly by 37 percent and 25 percent, respectively, of the patients with renal failure and by 19 percent and 12 percent, respectively, of the controls. Regular use of either drug in the absence of the other was associated with an increase by a factor of 2.5 in the risk of chronic renal failure from any cause. The relative risks rose with increasing cumulative lifetime doses, rose more consistently with acetaminophen use than with aspirin use, and were increased for most disease-specific types of chronic renal failure. When we disregarded the recent use of analgesics, which could have occurred in response to antecedents of renal disease, the associations were only slightly attenuated.Conclusions: Our results are consistent with the existence of exacerbating effects of acetaminophen and aspirin on chronic renal failure. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of bias due to the triggering of analgesic consumption by predisposing conditions.
|
|
| 2. |
- Fryzek, J.P., et al.
(författare)
-
Characteristics of women with cosmetic breast augmentation surgery compared with breast reduction surgery patients and women in the general population of Sweden
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Annals of Plastic Surgery. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0148-7043 .- 1536-3708. ; 45:4, s. 349-356
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To determine whether women with cosmetic breast implants have distinct demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive characteristics that put them at increased risk for subsequent morbidity, the authors compared 1,369 such women to 2,211 women who had undergone breast reduction surgery, and to a random sample of 49,262 women from the general population of Sweden. Information was collected through self-administered questionnaires, and comparisons were made using the prevalence odds ratio. Women with cosmetic breast implants were significantly (p <0.05) more likely to be current smokers, have a lower body mass index, have had a prematurely terminated pregnancy (induced abortion or miscarriage), and have had fewer live births than either women who underwent breast reduction or women from the general population. Type of implant (silicone gel or saline) did not modify the associations. Regardless of the comparison group used, studies of the health effects of breast implants need to consider that women who undergo cosmetic breast implantation have certain distinct characteristics.
|
|
