| 1. |
- Moiseev, Sergey, et al.
(författare)
-
2020 international consensus on ANCA testing beyond systemic vasculitis
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Autoimmunity Reviews. - : Elsevier BV. - 1568-9972. ; 19:9
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- This document follows up on a 2017 revised international consensus on anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCA) testing in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis and focuses on the clinical and diagnostic value of ANCA detection in patients with connective tissue diseases, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, autoimmune liver diseases, inflammatory bowel diseases, anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease, infections, malignancy, and during drug treatment. Current evidence suggests that in certain settings beyond systemic vasculitis, ANCA may have clinical, pathogenic and/or diagnostic relevance. Antigen-specific ANCA targeting proteinase-3 and myeloperoxidase should be tested by solid phase immunoassays in any patient with clinical features suggesting ANCA-associated vasculitis and in all patients with anti-GBM disease, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, and infective endocarditis associated with nephritis, whereas in patients with other aforementioned disorders routine ANCA testing is not recommended. Among patients with autoimmune liver diseases or inflammatory bowel diseases, ANCA testing may be justified in patients with suspected autoimmune hepatitis type 1 who do not have conventional autoantibodies or in case of diagnostic uncertainty to discriminate ulcerative colitis from Crohn's disease. In these cases, ANCA should be tested by indirect immunofluorescence as the target antigens are not yet well characterized. Many questions concerning the optimal use of ANCA testing in patients without ANCA-associated vasculitis remain to be answered.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sack, Ulrich, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality and best practice in medical laboratories : specific requests for autoimmunity testing
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Autoimmun Highlights. - : Springer. - 2038-0305 .- 2038-3274. ; 11:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Special conditions associated with laboratory autoimmune testing are not well compatible with recent developments in regulatory frameworks such as EN/ISO 15189 accreditation or in vitro diagnostic medical device regulation (IVD-R). In addition, international recommendations, guidelines and disease criteria are poorly defined with respect to requirements on autoantibody testing. Laboratory specialists from Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and The Netherlands collected information, reported national experience, and identified quality issues in relation to autoantibody testing that require consensus on interpretation of the regulatory frameworks and guidelines. This process has been organized by the European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative (EASI). By identifying the critical items and looking for a consensus, our objective was to define a framework for, in particular, EN/ISO accreditation purposes. Here, we present a review of current publications and guidelines in this field to unify national guidelines and deliver in this way a European handout on quality control and accreditation for laboratories involved in autoantibody testing. We focus on quality items that can be checked during accreditation visits. Despite various local varieties, we encountered an overwhelming dedication to quality assurance in all contributing countries.
|
|
| 3. |
- Stamatis, Pavlos, et al.
(författare)
-
Upadacitinib tartrate in rheumatoid arthritis
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Drugs of Today. - : Clarivate Analytics (US). - 1699-3993. ; 56:11, s. 723-732
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) there is an unmet therapeutic need, as a substantial proportion of patients does not achieve low disease activity or remission despite the use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and/or biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). The Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are the most recently added drug category in the therapeutic armamentarium in RA. Upadacitinib tartrate (Rinvoq), a selective and reversible JAK1 inhibitor, inhibited interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-7 and ameliorated adjuvant-induced arthritis in preclinical studies. In phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), upadacitinib, as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs, showed efficacy in RA patients with inadequate response to csDMARDs or bDMARDs. In a head-to-head RCT, upadacitinib 15 mg once daily was superior to adalimumab in achieving remission and in patient-reported outcomes. Upadacitinib has a good safety profile but it may increase the risk for herpes zoster, and as a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP3A4 it should not be coadministered with strong CYP3A4 inducers. Upadacitinib is contraindicated in patients with active tuberculosis, serious infections, active malignancy and in patients with severe liver impairment. Upadacitinib has been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe RA.
|
|
| 4. |
- Van Hoovels, Lieve, et al.
(författare)
-
Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns : results of an international survey
- 2020
-
Ingår i: AUTOIMMUNITY HIGHLIGHTS. - : Springer. - 2038-0305 .- 2038-3274. ; 11:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. Methods Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. Results 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. Conclusion This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.
|
|
