| 1. |
- Stuart, Kelsey V., et al.
(author)
-
The association of alcohol consumption with glaucoma and related traits : findings from the UK Biobank
- 2023
-
In: Ophthalmology Glaucoma. - : Elsevier. - 2589-4234 .- 2589-4196. ; 6:4, s. 366-379
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: To examine the associations of alcohol consumption with glaucoma and related traits; to assess whether a genetic predisposition to glaucoma modified these associations; and to perform Mendelian randomization (MR) experiments to probe causal effects.DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational and gene-environment interaction analyses in the UK Biobank. Two-sample MR experiments using summary statistics from large genetic consortia.PARTICIPANTS: UK Biobank participants with data on intraocular pressure (IOP) (n=109 097), OCT derived macular inner retinal layer thickness measures (n=46 236) and glaucoma status (n=173 407).METHODS: Participants were categorized according to self-reported drinking behaviors. Quantitative estimates of alcohol intake were derived from touchscreen questionnaires and food composition tables. We performed a two-step analysis, first comparing categories of alcohol consumption (never, infrequent, regular, and former drinkers), before assessing for a dose-response effect in regular drinkers only. Multivariable linear, logistic and restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression, adjusted for key sociodemographic, medical, anthropometric and lifestyle factors, were used to examine associations. We assessed whether any association was modified by a multi-trait glaucoma polygenic risk score. The inverse-variance weighted method was used for the main MR analyses.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IOP, macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL) thickness, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL) thickness, and prevalent glaucoma. RESULTS: Compared to infrequent drinkers, regular drinkers had higher IOP (+0.17mmHg; P<0.001) and thinner mGCIPL (-0.17μm; P=0.049); while former drinkers had a higher prevalence of glaucoma (OR 1.53; P=0.002). In regular drinkers, alcohol intake was adversely associated with all outcomes in a dose-dependent manner (all P<0.001). RCS regression analyses suggested non-linear associations, with apparent threshold effects at approximately 50g (∼6 UK or 4 US alcoholic units)/week, for mRNFL and mGCIPL thickness. Significantly stronger alcohol-IOP associations were observed in participants at higher genetic susceptibility to glaucoma (Pinteraction<0.001). MR analyses provided evidence for a causal association with mGCIPL thickness.CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol intake was consistently and adversely associated with glaucoma and related traits, and at levels below current UK (<112g/week) and US (women: <98g/week; men: <196g/week) guidelines. While we cannot infer causality definitively, these results will be of interest to people with, or at risk of, glaucoma and their advising physicians.
|
|
| 2. |
- Madjedi, Kian M., et al.
(author)
-
The Association between Serum Lipids and Intraocular Pressure in 2 Large United Kingdom Cohorts
- 2022
-
In: Ophthalmology. - : Elsevier. - 0161-6420 .- 1549-4713. ; 129:9, s. 986-996
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: Serum lipids are modifiable, routinely collected blood tests associated with cardiovascular health. We examined the association of commonly collected serum lipid measures (total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG)) with intraocular pressure (IOP).DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in the UK Biobank and EPIC-Norfolk cohorts.PARTICIPANTS: We included 94 323 participants of UK Biobank (mean age 57 years) and 6 230 participants of EPIC-Norfolk (mean age 68 years) with data on TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG collected between 2006-2009.METHODS: Multivariable linear regression adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, medical and ophthalmic covariables was used to examine the associations of serum lipids with IOPcc.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IOPcc.RESULTS: Higher levels of TC, HDL-C and LDL-C were independently associated with higher IOPcc in both cohorts after adjustment for key demographic, medical and lifestyle factors. For each standard deviation increase in TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C, IOPcc (mmHg) was higher by 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06-0.11; P<0.001), 0.11 (95% CI 0.08-0.13; P<0.001), 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.09, P<0.001), respectively in the UK Biobank cohort. In the EPIC-Norfolk cohort, each additional standard deviation in TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C was associated with a higher IOPcc (mmHg) by 0.19 (95% CI 0.07-0.31, P=0.001), 0.14 (95% CI 0.03-0.25, P=0.016), and 0.17 (95% CI 0.06-0.29, P=0.003). An inverse association between TGs and IOP in the UK Biobank (-0.05, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.03, P<0.001) was not replicated in the EPIC cohort (P=0.30).CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that serum TC, HDL-C and LDL-C are positively associated with IOP in two UK cohorts and TGs may be negatively associated. Future research is required to assess whether these associations are causal in nature.
|
|
