| 1. |
- Kanter-Smoler, Gunilla, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical characterization and the mutation spectrum in Swedish adenomatous polyposis families
- 2008
-
Ingår i: BMC Medicine. - : BioMed Central. - 1741-7015. ; 6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The dominantly inherited condition familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is caused by germline mutations in the APC gene. Finding the causative mutations has great implications for the families. Correlating the genotypes to the phenotypes could help to improve the diagnosis and follow-up of patients.Methods: Mutation screening of APCand the clinical characterization of 96 unrelated FAP patients from the Swedish Polyposis Registry was performed. In addition to generally used mutation screening methods, analyses of splicing-affecting mutations and investigations of the presence of low-frequency mutation alleles, indicating mosaics, have been performed, as well as quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect lowered expression of APC.Results: Sixty-one different APC mutations in 81 of the 96 families were identified and 27 of those are novel. We have previously shown that 6 of the 96 patients carried biallelic MUTYH mutations. The 9 mutation-negative cases all display an attenuated or atypical phenotype. Probands with a genotype (codon 1250-1464) predicting a severe phenotype had a median age at diagnosis of 21.8 (range, 11-49) years compared with 34.4 (range, 14-57) years among those with mutations outside this region (P < 0.017). Dense polyposis (> 1000) occurred in 75% of the probands with a severe phenotype compared with 30% in those with mutations outside this region. The morbidity in colorectal cancer among probands was 25% at a mean age of 37.5 years and 29% at a mean age of 46.6 years.Conclusion: Using a variety of mutation-detection techniques, we have achieved a 100% detection frequency in classical FAP. Probands with APC mutations outside codon 1250-1464, although exhibiting a less-severe phenotype, are at high risk of having a colorectal cancer at diagnosis indicating that age at diagnosis is as important as the severity of the disease for colorectal cancer morbidity. © 2008 Kanter-Smoler et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
|
|
| 2. |
- Rohlin, Anna, et al.
(författare)
-
Parallel sequencing used in detection of mosaic mutations: comparison with four diagnostic DNA screening techniques.
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Human mutation. - : Hindawi Limited. - 1098-1004 .- 1059-7794. ; 30:6, s. 1012-20
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We have made an evaluation of mutation detection techniques for their abilities to detect mosaic mutations. In this study, Sanger sequencing, single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)/heteroduplex analysis (HD), protein truncation test (PTT), and denaturating high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) were compared with parallel sequencing. In total DNA samples from nine patients were included in this study. Mosaic mutations were artificially constructed from seven of these samples, which were from heterozygote mutation carriers with the mutant allele present at 50%. The mutations analyzed were as follows: c.646C>T, c.2626C>T, c.2828C>A, c.1817_1818insA, c.2788dupA, c.416_419delAAGA, and c.607delC in the APC gene. The lowest degree of mutant alleles detected with SSCP/HD and DHPLC varied between 5% and 25%, and between 15% and 50% for Sanger sequencing. Three of the mutations were analyzed with PTT with considerable variations in detection levels (from 10 to 100%). Using parallel sequencing a detection frequency down to 1% was reached, but to achieve this high sensitivity sufficient coverage was required. Two patients with natural mosaic mutations were also included in this study. These two mutations had previously been identified with Sanger sequencing (NF2 c.1026_1027delGA) and SSCP/HD (APC c.2700_2701delTC). In conclusion, all the evaluated methods are applicable for mosaic mutation screening even though combinations of the conventional methods should be used to reach an adequate sensitivity. Sanger sequencing alone is not sensitive enough to detect low mosaic levels. Parallel sequencing seems to be the ultimate choice but the possibilities to use this technique is today limited by its complexity, economics, and availability of instruments.
|
|
