| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Örnebring, Henrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Journalistiken i ett jämförande perspektiv
- 2019. - 2
-
Ingår i: Handbok i journalistikforskning. - Lund : Studentlitteratur AB. - 9789144124636 ; , s. 25-42
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Många av journalistikforskningens centrala frågor kräver ett jämförande perspektiv för att kunna beskrivas på ett meningsfullt sätt. Många påståenden om huruvida olika aspekter av journalistiken har ökat, minskat, förändrats eller varit stabila saknar given referenspunkt. Har något ökat/minskat mer än vad man kan förvänta sig? I förhållande till vad? Är den egna nationen ett undantag eller ett helt genomsnittligt exempel på internationella trender? Dessa och andra liknande frågor sysselsätter den allt mer populära komparativa (jämförande) journalistikforskningen.Det här kapitlet går igenom de viktigaste inriktningarna i den komparativa journalistikforskningen. I första hand handlar det om jämförelser av journalistikens ställning i olika samhällen och kulturer, om journalisters värderingar och sätt att arbeta och om hur journalistiskt innehåll kan jämföras. I praktiken har komparativ journalistikforskning kommit att bli synonymt med transnationell komparativ forskning: det som jämförs är journalistiken i olika länder eller delar av världen. Andra komparativa alternativ, till exempel att jämföra journalister med andra yrkesgrupper, har inte fått samma utrymme inom journalistikforskningen.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Örnebring, Henrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Tabloid journalism and the public sphere : a historical perspective on tabloid journalism
- 2004
-
Ingår i: Journalism Studies. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1461-670X .- 1469-9699. ; 5:3, s. 283-295
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Tabloid journalism is generally considered to be synonymous with bad journalism. This assessment of tabloid journalism is not very productive from a social scientific point of view. The argument of this article is that the journalistic other of tabloid journalism has appeared throughout the history of journalism, and that elements and aspects of journalism defined as "bad" in its own time in many cases served the public good as well as, if not better than, journalism considered to be more respectable. Tabloid journalism achieves this by positioning itself, in different ways, as an alternative to the issues, forms and audiences of the journalistic mainstream–as an alternative public sphere. By tracking the development of tabloid journalism through history, we want to contribute to the reassessment and revision of the normative standards commonly used to assess journalism that is currently taking place within the field of journalism studies. We do this by first examining what is meant by an alternative public sphere and how it can be conceptualised, then by relating this to the historical development of tabloid journalism. The historical examples are used as a basis for reviewing and revising a key dimension of current criticisms of tabloid journalism.
|
|
| 5. |
- Örnebring, Henrik, 1972-
(författare)
-
The Maiden Tribute and the Naming of Monsters : two case studies of popular journalism as alternative public sphere
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Journalism Studies. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1461-670X .- 1469-9699. ; 7:6, s. 851-868
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this article is to contribute to the ongoing discussion about the critical potential of tabloid journalism. It does so through a comparison of two popular journalism campaigns: the “Maiden Tribute” campaign in the London newspaper the Pall Mall Gazette in 1885 (dealing with underage prostitution), and the “naming-and-shaming” campaign in the News of the World in 2000, concerning child abuse and paedophilia. The main research question is whether any or both of these campaigns can be viewed as contributions to an alternative public sphere, as defined using concepts from Örnebring and Jönsson (200416. Örnebring , Henrik and Jönsson , Anna Maria ( 2004 ) “Tabloid Journalism and the Public Sphere: a historical perspective on tabloid journalism” , Journalism Studies 5 ( 3 ), pp. 283 – 95 .[Taylor & Francis Online]View all references) and Atton (20021. Atton, Chris. 2002. Alternative Media, London: Sage. View all references). Three aspects of the campaigns are compared: (1) How they discursively frame the issue at hand, (2) How they discursively frame the key actors present in the texts, and (3) What mode of address is employed. The purpose of this comparison is to examine whether the campaigns open up alternative possibilities in how they frame and present the issue and the actors, and in how they address and give space to their audiences. The main result is that the Pall Mall Gazette campaign has the greater claim to being a contribution to an alternative public sphere in terms of how it frames the issue and the actors. The article further argues that while there is a distinct potential of tabloid journalism to contribute to an alternative public sphere in certain circumstances, this potential should not be overstated.
|
|
| 6. |
- Örnebring, Henrik, 1972-
(författare)
-
A social history of precarity in journalism : Penny-a-liners, bohemians and larrikins
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Australian Journalism Review. - : Intellect Ltd.. - 0810-2686 .- 2517-620X. ; 42:2, s. 191-206
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the past decade, journalism scholars have started to pay more attention to what we could call the precarization of journalism: the large-scale job loss and downsizing in the news industry (at least in some countries) combined with a shift towards per-item payment and production rather than permanent, full-time contracts. In this essay, I sketch a history of precarious work in journalism and argue that unionization and other forms of collective action in journalism has been made difficult due to an occupational culture rooted in this history of journalism as precarious work. In the late nineteenth century, journalists in many countries opted to create a culture rather than to create unions, and this culture has both mythologized and naturalized precarity. In Australia, however, journalists unionized early. Besides the obvious structural factors behind this early unionization, the existence of the cultural figure of the larrikin and its role in journalistic culture likely also encouraged taking on a worker identity rather than seeking to emulate an upper-class writerly culture.
|
|
| 7. |
- Örnebring, Henrik, 1972-
(författare)
-
Alias
- 2009
-
Ingår i: The Essential Cult Television Reader. - Lexington : The University Press of Kentucky. - 9780813125688 ; , s. 22-27
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
- Örnebring, Henrik, 1972-
(författare)
-
Alternate Reality Games and Convergence Culture : The Case of Alias
- 2007
-
Ingår i: International journal of cultural studies. - : SAGE Publications. - 1367-8779 .- 1460-356X. ; 10:4, s. 445-462
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Alternate Reality Games (ARGs) are a form of internet-based mystery game in which participants are immersed in a fictional world and engage in collective problem-solving. This article studies three ARGs connected to the TV series Alias (ABC, 2001—6), two of them launched by the network ABC as part of the marketing of the TV series, the third produced by fans. Previous research on ARGs has not sufficiently problematized the fact that many ARGs are marketing tools. While ARGs can be analysed as part of a wider context of convergence culture and fan culture, such an analysis must take into account the underlying commercial logic of popular culture production. Despite the differences found between industry-produced and fan-produced ARGs, they still share a framework of consumption that conforms to corporate goals of marketing and brand-building as well as fan audiences' goals of pleasurable interaction with fictional worlds
|
|
| 9. |
- Örnebring, Henrik, 1972-
(författare)
-
Anything you can do, I can do better? : Professional journalists vs. citizen journalistsin six European countries
- 2013
-
Ingår i: International Communication Gazette. - : SAGE Publications. - 1748-0485 .- 1748-0493. ; 75:1, s. 35-53
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article is based on 63 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with professional journalists across career stages and across media in six European countries (UK, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Poland and Sweden), and is concerned with how journalists answer the question: How is what you do different from what citizen journalists do? Based on existing literature on journalistic authority and the professional project, three areas where claims to professional legitimacy and distinction from amateurs are identified: expertise, duty and autonomy. The interview data show that while claims based on expertise and duty are common when professional journalists want to demarcate the boundary between them and citizen journalism, claims based on direct reference to autonomy are non-existent. However, claims based indirectly on reference to autonomy, but institutional or collective rather than individual autonomy, are common. Indeed the key result of this study is that legitimacy claims based on the collective nature of the journalistic endeavour are very common, in contrast to earlier constructions of journalistic professionalism, which emphasized individualism and individual autonomy.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
