| 21. |
- James, Stefan K., et al.
(författare)
-
A rapid troponin I assay is not optimal for determination of troponin status and prediction of subsequent cardiac events at suspicion of unstable coronary syndromes.
- 2004
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 93:2-3, s. 113-120
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Troponin is a specific marker of myocardial damage. For early prediction of coronary events in patients with suspicion of acute coronary syndromes the assay also needs to be highly sensitive. METHODS AND RESULTS: A rapid troponin I assay was performed prior to inclusion in 4447 acute coronary syndrome patients in the GUSTO-IV trial. A quantitative troponin T analysis was later performed on blood samples obtained at randomization by a central laboratory. There was an agreement between the rapid troponin I assay and troponin T (< or =/>0.1 microg/l) in 3596 (80.9%) patients. A positive rapid troponin I was identifying any elevation of troponin T (>0.01 microg/l) in 1990 patients (90.4%) whereas a negative rapid troponin I was corresponding to negative troponin T (< or =0.01 microg/l) in only 1217 patients (54.2%). Patients with a positive versus negative rapid troponin I had an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (9.3 vs. 5.9%; odds ratio, O.R. 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.06). Troponin T elevation (>0.1 microg/l) provided a better (10.5 v. 4.9%, O.R. 2.26; C.I. 1.79-2.85) risk stratification. Regardless of a positive or a negative rapid troponin I, the troponin T result (>0.1 vs. < or =0.1 microg/l) stratified the patients into high and low risk of events at 30 days, (10.3 vs. 5.7%, P=0.002) and (11.5 vs. 4.8%, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: In a population with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome a positive rapid troponin I assay is a specific indicator of troponin elevation and a predictor of early outcome. However, a negative rapid troponin I is not a reliable indicator of the absence of myocardial damage and does not indicate a low risk of subsequent cardiac events. A rapid troponin I assay was performed prior to inclusion in 4447 acute coronary syndrome patients in the GUSTO-IV trial and related to a centrally analyzed quantitative troponin T test. A positive rapid troponin I was well corresponding to any elevation of troponin T (>0.01 microg/l) and predicted an unfavorable outcome at 30 days. However, a negative rapid troponin I was corresponding to troponin T < or =0.01 microg/l in only half of the patients. Troponin T >0.1 microg/l vs. < or =0.1 microg/l provided a better risk stratification than the rapid troponin I result. For patients with troponin T elevation (>0.1 microg/l) the 30 day event rate was high regardless of the rapid troponin I result.
|
|
| 22. |
- Karlson, BW, et al.
(författare)
-
Use of medical resources complications and long-term outcome in patients hospitalized with acute chest pain. A comparison between a city university hospital and a county hospital
- 2002
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier Ireland Ltd. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 85:2-3, s. 229-238
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The primary aim was to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in long-term outcome after hospital discharge among patients hospitalized with acute chest pain in a university hospital and a county hospital. Secondary aims were to compare these two hospitals with regard to use of medical resources, occurrence of complications and risk indicators for death. Patients: All patients hospitalized at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Göteborg (with a catchment population of 706 inhabitants/km2) and Uddevalla County Hospital (with a catchment population of 34 inhabitants/km2) due to symptoms of acute chest pain during a period of 6 months. Results: Complications, use of medical resources and mortality during the subsequent 2 years after discharge were compared among 1592 hospitalizations in a city hospital and 822 in a county hospital due to acute chest pain. Angina pectoris after the first event, congestive heart failure and various arrhythmias were more frequently reported in the county hospital. The use of medical resources differed. Thus, the use of betablockers, heparin, antiarrhythmics, diuretics and nipride was more frequent in the county hospital, whereas the use of nitrates, digitalis, coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was more frequent in the city hospital. Despite these differences, the mortality 2 years after hospital discharge was similar (14.7% in the city hospital and 12.8% in the county hospital, P=0.26). Two factors, intravenous digitalis in hospital and a prescription of insulin at discharge, were significantly more associated with death in the county hospital compared with the city hospital. Conclusions: When comparing a city university hospital with a county hospital with regard to patients admitted with chest pain, major differences in terms of complications and use of medical resources were found. Thus, various complications were reported more frequently in the county hospital. The use of medical resources varied, some being used more frequently in the county hospital, whereas others were used more frequently in the university hospital. Despite these differences the mortality 2 years after hospital discharge was similar in the two cohorts.
|
|
| 23. |
- Karlson, BW, et al.
(författare)
-
Which factors determine the long-term outcome among patients with a very small or non confirmed AMI
- 2001
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier Ireland Ltd. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 78:3, s. 265-275
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: To describe various factors associated with the very long-term prognosis for patients with a very small or an unconfirmed acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Patients below 76 years of age, hospitalized due to suspected AMI who either developed a very small AMI (enzyme elevation
|
|
| 24. |
- Karlsson, BW, et al.
(författare)
-
One-year mortality rate after disharge from hospital in relation to whether or not a confirmed myocardial infarction was developed
- 1991
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier Ireland Ltd. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 32:3, s. 381-388
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with suspected acute myocardial infarction during 21 months were prospectively evaluated. One-year mortality after discharge from hospital was related to whether or not an infarction developed (infarct versus non-infarct patients). Of patients discharged alive after developing an infarct, there was a mortality of 17% (n = 777) versus 12% (n = 1830) (P < 0.001) for all patients not developing infarction. In a high risk group (any of the following: age ≥ 75 years, previous history of myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus or congestive heart failure) patients developing infarction had a mortality of 24% (n = 457) versus 17% (n = 1221) for those who did not (P < 0.001). In a low risk group (none of the high risk criteria), the corresponding mortality was 8% (n = 316) for patients suffering infarction and 3% (n = 603) for those not having infarction (P < 0.001). The difference in mortality between patients with and without infarction was most marked in women (21% vs 11%; P < 0.01) and in hypertensives (25% vs 12%; P < 0.001), but less marked in men (16% vs 13%; NS) and in patients without hypertension (13% vs 12%; NS). Among patients not suffering infarction, mortality was particularly high in those with previous congestive heart failure (23%) and diabetes mellitus (21%).
|
|
| 25. |
- Karlsson, BW, et al.
(författare)
-
The prognosis of patients suspected of having acute myocardial infarction subsequent to its exclusion as the diagnosis
- 1990
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier Ireland Ltd. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 26:3, s. 251-257
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This review of the literature concerns the prognosis of patients suspected of having myocardial infarction subsequent to its exclusion as the diagnosis. Several investigations show a surprisingly bad prognosis for patients in this category, almost comparable to that of patients with a confirmed infarction. When the results of the different studies are pooled, however, there is a significant difference between those patients with true infarction, and those in whom infarction was excluded, in terms of overall mortality (12% and 7%; P < 0.0001) and the development of subsequent non-fatal infarction (11% and 6%; P < 0.05) when the results are analysed for a period of follow-up of one year. The difference was significant even when both fatal and non-fatal infarctions were taken into account over the one-year period of follow-up (13% and 8%; P < 0.0001). The analysis shows that electrocardiographic ST-T changes are a risk factor for coronary events, but the results are conflicting for other possible risk factors. The selection of patients varies between the different studies, which probably contributes to the different results reported. Prospective studies with well defined groups of patients large enough to permit analysis of subgroupings will be needed to resolve the outstanding questions.
|
|
| 26. |
|
|
| 27. |
- Kjellgren, Karin I, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Antihypertensive medication in clinical encounters.
- 1998
-
Ingår i: International journal of cardiology. - 0167-5273. ; 64:2, s. 161-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In managing hypertension, patient participation and understanding of the nature and significance of treatment are decisive. We analysed the communication between patient and physician with respect to antihypertensive medication at a follow-up appointment, and assessed patients' knowledge of their medication. The empirical data consist of audio-recordings from 51 hypertensive patients' follow-up appointment with their physicians. Thirty-three of these patients were interviewed in depth immediately after the appointment. The study was performed in primary health care centres and at a specialist clinic for hypertension. When discussing medications, patients mainly talked about experiences of being on medication, whereas physicians generally focused on the pharmacological effect and dosage of the drug. Physicians routinely asked about compliance with drug regimen, but seldom in any depth. Little effort was invested into discussing the effect and goal of therapy. The main finding was that patients had a very fragmentary understanding of the functional nature of their antihypertensive medication. This is unsatisfactory both from the point of view of treatment efficacy and also when considering the legal requirements of involving the patient in the decision making. The follow-up appointments studied gave few possibilities for the patient to learn about their antihypertensive medication.
|
|
| 28. |
- Kjellgren, Karin I, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Taking antihypertensive medication--controlling or co-operating with patients?
- 1995
-
Ingår i: International journal of cardiology. - 0167-5273. ; 47:3, s. 257-68
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Low compliance with antihypertensive drug regimens has been a well documented reason for inadequate control of hypertension. We assessed recent literature regarding compliance from different disciplines to clarify the nature of reported problems on low compliance to prescribed antihypertensive medication. Much research focuses on primary factors for compliance, methods to monitor and measure individual rates and patterns of compliance. From a behavioural oriented point of view, the focus is on understanding why patients act as they do. This review indicates that there is an almost complete lack of knowledge about how the decision making in the clinical practice is organized when prescribing antihypertensive medication and/or when following up treatment from patients already taking such drugs. Since the concrete communication and collaboration between patient and physician in the clinical setting are of prime significance for patient adherence to drug regimens, it is important to shed light on what happens in this critical situation.
|
|
| 29. |
- Lindvall, B, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of diabetic and non diabetic patients referred for coronary angiography
- 1999
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier Ireland Ltd. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 70:1, s. 33-42
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIM: To evaluate whether diabetic patients differ from non-diabetic patients when referred for coronary angiography regarding previous history, indication for and findings at coronary angiography, use of medication, exercise test results and mortality. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on patients referred for consideration of coronary revascularization to seven of the eight public Swedish heart centers that performed approximately 92% of all bypass operations in Sweden in 1994. RESULTS: 2762 patients were included of whom 406 (15%) had a history of diabetes mellitus. There was no difference in age or sex in the two groups. Chronic stable angina was the most common indication (73% in both groups) and only 3% were admitted due to silent ischemia. Diabetic patients had more severe symptoms (Canadian Cardiovascular Society III-IV) than non-diabetic patients (66% vs. 58%, p<0.01). They more frequently used ACE-inhibitors (33% vs. 19%, p<0.0001) and calcium channel blockers (47% vs. 40%, p<0.01) and more often had a diagnosis of arterial hypertension than non-diabetic patients (50% vs. 33%, p<0.0001). Diabetic patients more often had depressed myocardial function (EF<35%); 12% and 8%, respectively (p<0.01), and more extensive coronary artery disease (left main/3-VD; 48% vs. 37%, p<0.001). The mortality during the subsequent 21 months was 7.9% among diabetic patients and 3.6% among non-diabetic patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Among patients being referred for coronary angiography in Sweden, 15% were patients with a history of diabetes. They differed from patients without such a history by more often having severe symptoms and a higher prevalence of left main/triple vessel disease. Coronary angiography may thus be underused in diabetic patients with chest pain.
|
|
| 30. |
|
|
