| 31. |
|
|
| 32. |
|
|
| 33. |
|
|
| 34. |
- Elmose, Signe Forbech, et al.
(författare)
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proxies for Segmental Instability in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Patients
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 47:21, s. 1473-1482
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study design: Retrospective cohort study.Objective: The aim was to investigate whether findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be proxies (MRIPs) for segmental instability in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and/or degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) L4/L5.Background: LDS has a heterogeneous nature. Some patients have a dynamic component of segmental instability associated with LDS. Studies have shown that MRI can show signs of instability.Methods: Patients with LSS or LDS at L4/L5 undergoing decompressive surgery +/- fusion from 2010 to 2017, with preoperative standing lateral spine radiographs and supine lumbar MRI and enrolled in Danish national spine surgical database, DaneSpine. Instability defined as slip of >3 mm on radiographs. Patients divided into two groups based upon presence of instability. Outcome measures: radiograph: sagittal slip (mm). MRIPs for instability: sagittal slip >3 mm, facet joint angle (degrees), facet joint effusion (mm), disk height index (%), and presence of vacuum phenomena. Optimal thresholds for MRIPs was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). Logistic regression to investigate association between instability and MRIPs.Results: Two hundred thirty-two patients: 47 stable group and 185 unstable group. The two groups were comparable with regard to baseline patient-reported outcome measures. Thresholds for MRIPs: bilateral facet joint angle >= 46 degrees; bilateral facet effusion >= 1.5 mm and disk height index >= 13%. Logistic regression showed statistically significant association with MRIPs except vacuum phenomena, ROC curve AUC of 0.951. By absence of slip on MRI logistic regression showed statistically significant association between instability on radiograph and the remaining MRIPs, ROC curve AUC 0.757.Conclusion: Presence of MRIPs for instability showed statistically significant association with instability and excellent ability to predict instability on standing radiograph in LSS and LDS patients. Even in the absence of slip on MRI the MRIPs had a good ability to discriminate presence of instability.
|
|
| 35. |
|
|
| 36. |
- Elmqvist, Erik, et al.
(författare)
-
No Benefit with Preservation of Midline Structures in Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Results From the National Swedish Spine Registry 2-Year Post-Op
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 47:7, s. 531-538
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Design. Observational cohort study. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate whether preservation of the midline structures is associated with a better clinical outcome compared to classic central decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Summary of Background Data. The classic surgical procedure for LSS is a central, facet joint sparing decompressive laminectomy (LE). Alternative approaches have been developed to preserve the midline structures. The effect of the alternative techniques compared to LE remains unclear. Methods. All patients >50 years of age who underwent decompression surgery for LSS without concomitant fusion in the National Swedish Spine Registry (Swespine) from December 31, 2015 until October 6, 2017 were included in this study based on surgeon-reported data and patient questionnaires before and 2 years postoperatively. Propensity score matching was used to compare decompression with preservation of midline structures with patients who underwent LE. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and secondary outcomes were the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for leg and back pain, EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Global Assessment (GA), patient satisfaction and rate of subsequent surgery. Results. Some 3339 patients completed a 2-year follow-up. Of these, 2974 (89%) had decompression with LE and 365 underwent midline preserving surgery. Baseline scores were comparable between the groups. Mean ODI improvement at follow-up was 16.6 (SD = 20.0) in the LE group and 16.9 (SD = 20.2) in the midline preserving surgery group. In the propensity score-matched analysis the difference in improved ODI was 0.53 (95% confidence interval, CI -1.71 to 2.76; P = 0.64). The proportion of patients who showed a decreased ODI score of at least our defined minimal clinically important difference (=8) was 68.3% after LE and 67.0% after preserving the midline structures (P = 0.73). No significant differences were found in the improvement of NRS for leg and back pain, EQ-5D, GA or patient satisfaction. The rate of subsequent surgery was 5.5% after LE and 4.9% after midline preserving surgery without a significant difference in the propensity score-matched analysis (hazard ratio, HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.49-1.54; P = 0.64). Conclusion. In this study on decompression techniques for LSS, there was no benefit in preserving the midline structures compared to LE 2 years after decompression. The conclusion is that the surgeon is free to choose the surgical method that is thought most suitable for the patient and the condition with which the patient presents.
|
|
| 37. |
- Engquist, Markus, et al.
(författare)
-
Factors Affecting the Outcome of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 40:20, s. 1553-1563
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Design. Prospective randomized controlled trial. Objective. To analyze factors that may influence the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) followed by physiotherapy versus physiotherapy alone for treatment of patients with cervical radiculopathy. Summary of Background Data. An understanding of patient-related factors affecting the outcome of ACDF is important for preoperative patient selection. No previous prospective, randomized study of treatment effect modifiers relating to outcome of ACDF compared with physiotherapy has been carried out. Methods. 60 patients with cervical radiculopathy were randomized to ACDF followed by physiotherapy or physiotherapy alone. Data for possible modifiers of treatment outcome at 1 year, such as sex, age, duration of pain, pain intensity, disability (Neck Disability Index, NDI), patient expectations of treatment, anxiety due to neck/arm pain, distress (Distress and Risk Assessment Method), self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy Scale) health status (EQ-5D), and magnetic resonance imaging findings were collected. A multivariate analysis was performed to find treatment effect modifiers affecting the outcome regarding arm/neck pain intensity and NDI. Results. Factors that significantly altered the treatment effect between treatment groups in favor of surgery were: duration of neck pain less than 12 months (P = 0.007), duration of arm pain less than 12 months (P = 0.01) and female sex (P = 0.007) (outcome: arm pain), low EQ-5D index (outcome: neck pain, P = 0.02), high levels of anxiety due to neck/arm pain (outcome: neck pain, P = 0.02 and NDI, P = 0.02), low Self-Efficacy Scale score (P = 0.05), and high Distress and Risk Assessment Method score (P = 0.04) (outcome: NDI). No factors were found to be associated with better outcome with physiotherapy alone. Conclusion. In this prospective, randomized study of patients with cervical radiculopathy, short duration of pain, female sex, low health quality, high levels of anxiety due to neck/arm pain, low self-efficacy, and a high level of distress before treatment were associated with better outcome from surgery. No factors were found to be associated with better outcome from physiotherapy alone.
|
|
| 38. |
- Engquist, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy : A prospective, randomized study comparing surgery plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone with a 2-year follow-up
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 38:20, s. 1715-1722
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- STUDY DESIGN.: Prospective randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE.: To study the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion combined with a structured physiotherapy program compared with the same physiotherapy program alone for patients with cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Knowledge concerning the effects of interventions for patients with cervical radiculopathy is scarce due to a lack of randomized studies. METHODS.: Sixty-three patients were randomized to surgery with postoperative physiotherapy (n = 31) or physiotherapy alone (n = 32). The surgical group was treated with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. The physiotherapy program included general/specific exercises and pain-coping strategies. The outcome measures were disability (Neck Disability Index), neck and arm pain intensity (visual analogue scale), and the patient's global assessment. Patients were followed for 24 months. RESULTS.: The result from the repeated-measures analysis of variance showed no significant between-group difference for Neck Disability Index (P = 0.23). For neck pain intensity, the repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant between-group difference during the study period in favor of the surgical group (P = 0.039). For arm pain intensity, no significant between-group differences were found according to the repeated-measures analysis of variance (P = 0.580). Eighty-seven percent of the patients in the surgical group rated their symptoms as "better/much better" at the 12-month follow-up compared with 62% in the nonsurgical group (P < 0.05). At 24 months, the corresponding figures were 81% and 69% (P = 0.28). The difference was significant only at the 12-month follow-up in favor of the surgical group. Significant reduction in Neck Disability Index, neck pain, and arm pain compared with baseline was seen in both groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION.: In this prospective, randomized study of patients with cervical radiculopathy, it was shown that surgery with physiotherapy resulted in a more rapid improvement during the first postoperative year, with significantly greater improvement in neck pain and the patient's global assessment than physiotherapy alone, but the differences between the groups decreased after 2 years. Structured physiotherapy should be tried before surgery is chosen. Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
|
|
| 39. |
- Enthoven, Paul, 1955-, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical course in patients seeking primary care for back or neck pain : a prospective 5-year follow-up of outcome and health care consumption with subgroup analysis
- 2004
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 29:21, s. 2458-2465
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Design. Prospective follow-up.Objective. To describe the 5-year clinical course in a cohort of patients treated for back or neck pain in primary care and compare results with the 1-year outcome both for the whole group and for subgroups.Summary of Background Data. A randomized study showed a decrease in perceived pain and disability after treatment by chiropractic or physiotherapy, but many reported recurrence or continual pain at the 1-year follow-up. Knowledge of the clinical course over longer follow-up periods is limited.Methods. A 5-year follow-up questionnaire was sent to 314 individuals. Main outcome measures were pain intensity, Oswestry score, and general health. Recurrence, health care consumption, and other measures were described.Results. Fifty-two percent of respondents reported pain (visual analog scale, >10 mm) and back-related disability (Oswestry, >10%) at the 5-year follow-up. This was similar to 1-year results, and 84% of these were the same individuals. Sixty-three percent reported recurrence or continual pain, and 32% reported health care consumption at the 5-year follow-up.Conclusions. In a cohort of individuals of working age seeking primary care for nonspecific back or neck pain, it can be expected that about half of the population will report pain and disability at the 5-year follow-up. A significant proportion will report recurrence or continual pain and health care consumption. Pain and disability were associated with recurrence or continual pain and health care consumption. Further analysis is needed to identify additional predictors for 5-year outcome, taking into account 1-year follow-up results. Since many patients will have recurrence or continual pain, health policies and clinical decision models for long-term outcome must allow for these aspects.
|
|
| 40. |
- Finskas, Oscar, et al.
(författare)
-
New, clinically more relevant model for nerve root injury in the rat
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Spine. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 38:20, s. 1744-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- STUDY DESIGN: Exposure to nucleus pulposus and displacement of intraspinal nervous structures with assessment of spontaneous behavioral changes in rats. OBJECTIVE: To develop a controlled, experimental model for nerve root injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are a number of experimental models presented for studies on radiculopathies. One frequently used model is based on exposure to nucleus pulposus and displacement of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG). However, it is clinically more common that the nerve roots are displaced/compressed than the DRG. In this study, we developed a model for displacement of the nerve root by modifying the DRG model. METHODS: After removing the left L3-L4 facet joint, the underlying disc was punctured, and the L4 nerve root was displaced laterally by an injection needle (n = 10). In sham experiments, the same procedure was performed without disc puncture and displacement (n = 10). In 10 rats, the left L4-L5 facet joint was removed. The underlying disc was punctured and the L4 DRG was displaced medially by an injection needle. Assessment of spontaneous behavioral changes was performed on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21, postsurgery. RESULTS: There was a clear increase in duration of the behavior "unloading of the paw" after displacement of the DRG that was most pronounced on day 1 and then gradually declined. There was a similar pattern for this behavior induced by nerve root displacement, although the duration was higher than that for the DRG displacement. No apparent trends in behavioral changes were observed for the other behaviors studied. CONCLUSION: Displacement of the nerve root induced more changes in the pain behavior than displacement of the DRG, but only for the behavior unloading of the paw. Because nerve root injury is more common than DRG injury, this model may be more clinically relevant than the DRG model. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
|
|
