| 41. |
- Falk, Hanna, 1977, et al.
(författare)
-
Differences in Symptom Distress Based on Gender and Palliative Care Designation Among Hospitalized Patients.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of Nursing Scholarship. - : Wiley. - 1527-6546 .- 1547-5069. ; 48:6, s. 569-576
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: To explore patient-reported symptom distress in relation to documentation of symptoms and palliative care designation in hospital inpatients.DESIGN: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 710 inpatients at two large hospitals in Sweden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. Chart reviews focused on nurses' and physicians' symptom documentation and palliative turning point.METHODS: Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables and provided summaries about the sample. Patients were grouped according to gender, age, palliative care designation, and symptom documentation. The t test and chi-square test were used to calculate whether symptom distress varied between groups. A two-way analysis of variance was conducted for multiple comparisons to explore the impact of gender and age on mean symptom distress.FINDINGS: Females reported higher levels of symptom distress than did males related to pain, fatigue, and nausea. When comparing symptom distress between males and females with documentation pertaining to symptoms, there were significant differences implying that females had to report higher levels of symptom distress than males in order to have their symptoms documented.CONCLUSIONS: Females need to report higher levels of symptom distress than do males for healthcare professionals to identify and document their symptoms. It can be hypothesized that females are not receiving the same attention and symptom alleviation as men. If so, this highlights a serious inequality in care that requires further exploration.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering that common reasons why people seek health care are troublesome symptoms of illness, and that the clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients are changing towards more advanced ages with serious illnesses, inadequate symptom assessment and management are a serious threat to the care quality.
|
|
| 42. |
- Feldthusen, Caroline, 1977, et al.
(författare)
-
Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Health Expectations. - : Wiley. - 1369-6513 .- 1369-7625. ; 25:3, s. 885-901
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction The introduction of effective, evidence-based approaches to centredness in health care is hindered by the fact that research results are not easily accessible. This is partly due to the large volume of publications available and because the field is closely linked to and in some ways encompasses adjoining fields of research, for example, shared decision making and narrative medicine. In an attempt to survey the field of centredness in health care, a systematic overview of reviews was conducted with the purpose of illuminating how centredness in health care is presented in current reviews. Methods Searches for relevant reviews were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, PsychINFO, Web of Science and EMBASE using terms connected to centredness in health care. Filters specific to review studies of all types and for inclusion of only English language results as well as a time frame of January 2017-December 2018, were applied. Results The search strategy identified 3697 unique reviews, of which 31 were included in the study. The synthesis of the results from the 31 reviews identified three interrelated main themes: Attributes of centredness (what centredness is), Translation from theory into practice (how centredness is done) and Evaluation of effects (possible ways of measuring effects of centredness). Three main attributes of centeredness found were: being unique, being heard and shared responsibility. Aspects involved in translating theory into practice were sufficient prerequisites, strategies for action and tools used in safeguarding practice. Further, a variety and breadth of measures of effects were found in the included reviews. Conclusions Our synthesis demonstrates that current synthesized research literature on centredness in health care is broad, as it focuses both on explorations of the conceptual basis and the practice, as well as measures of effects. This study provides an understanding of the commonalities identified in the reviews on centredness in healthcare overall, ranging from theory to practice and from practice to evaluation. Patient or Public Contribution Patient representatives were involved during the initiation of the project and in decisions about its focus, although no patient or public representatives made direct contributions to the review process.
|
|
| 43. |
|
|
| 44. |
- Forsgren, Emma, 1982, et al.
(författare)
-
The use of text-mining software to facilitate screening of literature on centredness in health care.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Systematic Reviews. - 2046-4053. ; 12:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Research evidence supporting the implementation of centredness in health care is not easily accessible due to the sheer amount of literature available and the diversity in terminology and conceptualisations used. The use of text-mining functions to semi-automate the process of screening and collating citations for a review is a way of tackling the vast amount of research citations available today. There are several programmes that use text-mining functions to facilitate screening and data extraction for systematic reviews. However, the suitability of these programmes for reviews on broad topics of research, as well as the general uptake by researchers, is unclear. This commentary has a dual aim, which consists in outlining the challenges of screening literature in fields characterised by vague and overlapping conceptualisations, and to exemplify this by exploratory use of text-mining in the context of a scoping review on centredness in health care.
|
|
| 45. |
- Friberg, Febe, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Communicating bodily changes : Physicians' ways of enabling patient understanding in gastrointestinal cancer consultations
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Palliative & Supportive Care. - 1478-9515 .- 1478-9523. ; 13:03, s. 661-671
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To explore how physicians communicatively enable patients' understanding of bodily changes in gastrointestinal cancer care consultations.Method: Two datasets were used. The first consisted of transcribed video-recorded palliative care consultations with three oncologists and six patients diagnosed with advanced gastrointestinal cancer, in the context of outpatient palliative care. The second dataset was audio-recorded transcriptions from diagnostic consultations with six surgeons and seven patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, in the context of cancer surgery. An inductively driven and iterative analysis of interaction was performed, guided by Wetherell et al. (2001).Results: Two overarching communicative strategies were identified: (1) “visualizing strategies,” with the dimensions: visible strategies (visualizing with what you actually or potentially can see), sensory strategies (visualizing with what is possible to feel), and imaginative strategies; and (2) “contrasting strategies,” with the dimensions: contrasting subjective experiences and contrasting between the patient and other people.Significance of results: The visualizing and contrasting communicative strategies form parts of physicians' tacit and experience-based knowledge. The strategies employed by physicians reveal clear potentials to enable patients' understanding and sense making of bodily changes. However, these strategies need to be explicated and problematized as parts of both consultation practice and basic medical education. By means of increased awareness, physicians can more easily identify turning points in patients' levels of understanding, thereby enriching ordinary medical consultations with reflected pedagogical strategies and skills in how to dialogue in a person-centered manner.
|
|
| 46. |
- Friberg, Febe, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Context and methodological decontextualisation in nursing research with examples from phenomenography
- 2000
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. - 0283-9318. ; 14, s. 37-43
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In both human science and nursing research the concept of context is important. However, context can be understood in different ways. The aim of this article is to elucidate, discuss and problematize context, decontextualization and recontextualization in some health care-related phenomenographical studies. A further aim is to problematize the concept of context in a wider perspective of human science, in order to gain a better understanding of phenomenographical research related to nursing care. Our analysis indicates that the complex phenomena which characterize nursing research demand a broad contextual understanding. Both the local or immediate context and the global or mediated context must be considered, as they are dialectically related. This includes the informants' experiences of the phenomenon of interest as well as the socio-cultural discourse. A balance between openness and pliability to the phenomenon is suggested. Reflection is considered an important tool in this process. Within phenomenography, the interest is directed towards conceptions of certain aspects of the world. Thus, context in a wider sense is given a subordinate role. Accordingly, phenomenography is considered to have limited applicability in nursing research when complex phenomena are to be studied. PMID: 12035261 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
|
|
| 47. |
|
|
| 48. |
- Friberg, Febe, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Creating space for learning at oncology outpatient units.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: The Fourth Pan-Pacific Nuring Conference. The Sixth Hong-Kong Nursing Symposium on Cancer Care. Managing Chronic Illness: Challenges and Opportunities for Nursing Practice and research, 13-15 November 2008. Hong Kong.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 49. |
- Friberg, Febe, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Developing Clinical Communication Intervention: Merging Qualitative Results from Patients with Palliative Cancer Care Teams Professional Experience by means of Qualitative Outcome Analysis
- 2010
-
Ingår i: 18 th Congress on Palliative Care. October 5-8 2010 Montreal, Canada.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Recent decades have witnessed the development of qualitative methods as well as intense debate concerning the significance of methodological rigor. Although qualitative research has become an established part of palliative care, questions have been raised concerning how results can inform practice. Qualitative Outcome Analysis (QOA) is a method derived from qualitative research that allows interventions to be evaluated and that bridges the theory-practice gap on the path from knowledge generation to knowledge implementation. The aim is to describe QOA by means of examples from an ongoing project about communication in palliative cancer care and on the basis of our results from phenomenological and conversational analysis studies of person centred information in palliative care for patients with recurrent gastrointestinal cancer. The participatory dimensions identified in the project will be related to QOA procedures. Focus groups with the palliative care team at an oncology outpatient unit were held, and major results from previous studies in the project were used as facilitators for discussion and reflection on the team’s professional experiences. In this way patient-reported qualitative findings were merged with professionals’ experience. Group discussion data were analyzed concurrently. A preliminary clinical intervention model was developed and refined by means of small scale clinical tests conducted by the team as well as other focus groups made up of different palliative care teams. The tentative model of communication in palliative cancer care for patients with gastrointestinal cancer will be presented, including main concepts, strategies and outcomes. The applicability of QOA will be presented. A particular dimension identified in the process was participatory aspects related to the shared commitment between the clinicians and the researchers. Such participatory aspects will be elaborated upon and related to the Participatory Action Research tradition. Implications of the model and relating QOA to Participatory Action Research will be reflected upon.
|
|
| 50. |
- Friberg, Febe, 1950, et al.
(författare)
-
Exploration of dynamics in a complex person-centred intervention process based on health professionals' perspectives
- 2018
-
Ingår i: BMC Health Services Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1472-6963. ; 18:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The assessment and evaluation of practical and sustainable development of health care has become a major focus of investigation in health services research. A key challenge for researchers as well as decision-makers in health care is to understand mechanisms influencing how complex interventions work and become embedded in practice, which is significant for both evaluation and later implementation. In this study, we explored nurses' and surgeons' perspectives on performing and participating in a complex multi-centre person-centred intervention process that aimed to support patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer to feel prepared for surgery, discharge and recovery. Method: Data consisted of retrospective interviews with 20 professionals after the intervention, supplemented with prospective conversational data and field notes from workshops and follow-up meetings (n = 51). The data were analysed to construct patterns in line with interpretive description. Results: Although the participants highly valued components of the intervention, the results reveal influencing mechanisms underlying the functioning of the intervention, including multiple objectives, unclear mandates and competing professional logics. The results also reveal variations in processing the intervention focused on differences in using and talking about intervention components. Conclusions: The study indicates there are significant areas of ambiguity in understanding how theory-based complex clinical interventions work and in how interventions are socially constructed and co-created by professionals' experiences, assumptions about own professional practice, contextual conditions and the researchers' intentions. This process evaluation reveals insights into reasons for success or failure and contextual aspects associated with variations in outcomes. Thus, there is a need for further interpretive inquiry, and not only descriptive studies, of the multifaceted characters of complex clinical interventions and how the intervention components are actually shaped in constantly shifting contexts.
|
|
