| 41. |
|
|
| 42. |
|
|
| 43. |
|
|
| 44. |
|
|
| 45. |
- Glimelius, Bengt
(författare)
-
More than 1000 new manuscripts in 2017
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 57:2, s. 174-175
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 46. |
- Glimelius, Bengt
(författare)
-
On a prolonged interval between rectal cancer (chemo) radiotherapy and surgery
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. - : TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. - 0300-9734 .- 2000-1967. ; 122:1, s. 1-10
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is often required before rectal cancer surgery to obtain low local recurrence rates or, in locally advanced tumours, to radically remove the tumour. RT/CRT in tumours responding completely can allow an organ-preserving strategy. The time from the end of the RT/CRT to surgery or to the decision not to operate has been prolonged during recent years. After a brief review of the literature, the relevance of the time interval to surgery is discussed depending upon the indication for RT/CRT. In intermediate rectal cancers, where the aim is to decrease local recurrence rates without any need for down-sizing/-staging, short-course RT with immediate surgery is appropriate. In elderly patients at risk for surgical complications, surgery could be delayed 5-8 weeks. If CRT is used, surgery should be performed when the acute radiation reaction has subsided or after 5-6 weeks. In locally advanced tumours, where CRT is indicated, the optimal delay is 6-8 weeks. In patients not tolerating CRT, short-course RT with a 6-8-week delay is an alternative. If organ preservation is a goal, a first evaluation should preferably be carried out after about 6 weeks, with planned surgery for week 8 if the response is inadequate. In case the response is good, a new evaluation should be carried out after about 12 weeks, with a decision to start a 'watch-and-wait' programme or operate. Chemotherapy in the waiting period is an interesting option, and has been the subject of recent trials with promising results.
|
|
| 47. |
- Glimelius, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Persistent prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy using calmangafodipir (PledOx®) : a placebo-controlled randomised phase II study (PLIANT)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 57:3, s. 393-402
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Oxaliplatin causes disabling acute and chronic peripheral neuropathy. We explored the preventive effects of calmangafodipir, mimicking the mitochondrial enzyme manganese superoxide dismutase, thereby protecting cells from oxidative stress, in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded randomised phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov.NCT01619423) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patient and methods: mCRC patients treated with modified FOLFOX-6 (folinic acid 200 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 46 h) every fortnight for 8 cycles in first or second line were eligible. Calmangafodipir was given in a phase I dose-finding and in a phase II placebo-controlled study, as a 5-min infusion 10 min prior to oxaliplatin. Neurotoxicity was evaluated by the physician using the Oxaliplatin Sanofi Specific Scale and by the patient using the cold allodynia test and the Leonard scale.Results: Eleven patients were included in phase I without any detectable toxicity to calmangafodipir. In the phase II study, 173 patients were randomised to placebo (n = 60), calmangafodipir 2 µmol/kg (n = 57) and calmangafodipir 5 µmol/kg (n = 45, initially 10 µmol/kg, n = 11). Calmangafodipir-treated patients (all three doses pooled) had less physician graded neurotoxicity (odds ratio (90% confidence interval one-sided upper level) 0.62(1.15), p = .16), significantly less problems with cold allodynia (mean 1.6 versus 2.3, p < .05) and significantly fewer sensory symptoms in the Leonard scale (cycle 1–8 mean 1.9 versus 3.0, p < .05 and during follow-up after 3 and 6 months, mean 3.5 versus 7.3, p < .01). Response rate, progression-free and overall survival did not differ among groups.Conclusions: Calmangafodipir at a dose of 5 µmol/kg appears to prevent the development of oxaliplatin-induced acute and delayed CIPN without apparent influence on tumour outcomes.
|
|
| 48. |
|
|
| 49. |
|
|
| 50. |
- Glimelius, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
The PLIANT trial gives trustworthy data
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Acta Oncologica. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 57:6, s. 864-866
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
