| 21. |
- Wendt, Frank R., et al.
(författare)
-
The Relationship of Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder : A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization and Population-Based Sibling Comparison Study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Biological Psychiatry. - : Elsevier. - 0006-3223 .- 1873-2402. ; 93:4, s. 362-369
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are associated but it is unclear if this is a causal relationship or confounding. We used genetic analyses and sibling comparisons to clarify the direction this relationship.Methods: Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) were used to test for genetic correlation (rg) and bidirectional causal effects using European ancestry genome-wide association studies of ADHD (20,183 cases and 35,191 controls) and six PTSD definitions (up to 320,369 individuals). Several additional variables were included in the analysis to verify the independence of the ADHD-PTSD relationship. In a population-based sibling comparison (N=2,082,118 individuals), Cox regression models were fitted to account for time at risk, a range of sociodemographic factors, and unmeasured familial confounders (via sibling comparisons).Results: ADHD and PTSD had consistent rg (rg range, 0.43-0.52; P < .001). ADHD genetic liability was causally linked with increased risk for PTSD (Beta=0.367, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.186-0.552, P=7.68x10-5). This result was not affected by heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy (MR Egger intercept=4.34x10-4, P=0.961), or other phenotypes, and was consistent across PTSD datasets. However, we found no consistent associations between PTSD genetic liability and ADHD risk. Individuals diagnosed with ADHD were at a higher risk for developing PTSD than their undiagnosed sibling (hazard ratio=2.37, 95% CI 1.98-3.53).Conclusions: Our findings add novel evidence supporting the need for early and effective treatment of ADHD as patients with this diagnosis are at significantly higher risk to develop PTSD later in life.
|
|
| 22. |
- Yildiz, Yildiz, et al.
(författare)
-
Functional and genetic characterization of the non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase 2 as a modifier for Gaucher disease
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1750-1172. ; 8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Gaucher disease (GD) is the most common inherited lysosomal storage disorder in humans, caused by mutations in the gene encoding the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GBA1). GD is clinically heterogeneous and although the type of GBA1 mutation plays a role in determining the type of GD, it does not explain the clinical variability seen among patients. Cumulative evidence from recent studies suggests that GBA2 could play a role in the pathogenesis of GD and potentially interacts with GBA1. Methods: We used a framework of functional and genetic approaches in order to further characterize a potential role of GBA2 in GD. Glucosylceramide (GlcCer) levels in spleen, liver and brain of GBA2-deficient mice and mRNA and protein expression of GBA2 in GBA1-deficient murine fibroblasts were analyzed. Furthermore we crossed GBA2-deficient mice with conditional Gba1 knockout mice in order to quantify the interaction between GBA1 and GBA2. Finally, a genetic approach was used to test whether genetic variation in GBA2 is associated with GD and/or acts as a modifier in Gaucher patients. We tested 22 SNPs in the GBA2 and GBA1 genes in 98 type 1 and 60 type 2/3 Gaucher patients for single-and multi-marker association with GD. Results: We found a significant accumulation of GlcCer compared to wild-type controls in all three organs studied. In addition, a significant increase of Gba2-protein and Gba2-mRNA levels in GBA1-deficient murine fibroblasts was observed. GlcCer levels in the spleen from Gba1/Gba2 knockout mice were much higher than the sum of the single knockouts, indicating a cross-talk between the two glucosylceramidases and suggesting a partially compensation of the loss of one enzyme by the other. In the genetic approach, no significant association with severity of GD was found for SNPs at the GBA2 locus. However, in the multi-marker analyses a significant result was detected for p.L444P (GBA1) and rs4878628 (GBA2), using a model that does not take marginal effects into account. Conclusions: All together our observations make GBA2 a likely candidate to be involved in GD etiology. Furthermore, they point to GBA2 as a plausible modifier for GBA1 in patients with GD.
|
|
