| 61. |
- Noll, Gregor, et al.
(författare)
-
Internationell flyktingrätt
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Folkrätten i ett nötskal. - 9144008732 ; , s. 129-132
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 62. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964, et al.
(författare)
-
Introduction: Our Emerging World of War
- 2019
-
Ingår i: War and algorithm / Edited by Max Liljefors, Gregor Noll and Daniel Steuer.. - London/New York : Rowman & Littlefield International. - 9781786613646 ; , s. 1-8
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 63. |
- Noll, Gregor
(författare)
-
Introduction: The Laws of Undocumented Migration
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Migration and Law. - 1388-364X. ; 12:2, s. 143-147
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- An introduction to the special issue of the European Journal of Migration and Law dealing with undocumented migrants.
|
|
| 64. |
|
|
| 65. |
- Noll, Gregor
(författare)
-
Junk Science? Four Arguments Against the Radiological Age Assessment of Unaccompanied Minors Seeking Asylum
- 2016
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Refugee Law. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1464-3715 .- 0953-8186. ; 28:2, s. 234-250
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Should radiological age assessment be considered as a means of alleviating thedoubts of a decision maker in the asylum procedure? The present article addressesthis question through a number of steps. First, it questions whether the use of radiologicalimaging methods in the age assessment of unaccompanied adolescents seekingasylum complies with the internal norms of the forensic science community. Itdoes not. Secondly, the article considers whether the use of these methods is scientificallyauthoritative according to the current state of the art in forensic medicineand traumatology. It is not. Thirdly, the article asks whether their use sufficientlysafeguards against a particular kind of communicative error between decision makersand experts. It does not. The article shows that properly understood advice from amedical expert who takes into account the scientific issues enumerated in this articlecan never dispel doubt about an applicant’s age. According to article 25(5) of theEuropean Union (EU) recast Asylum Procedures Directive, this prevailing doubt willautomatically trigger the assumption that the applicant is a child, which is the article’sfourth and final argument.
|
|
| 66. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964
(författare)
-
Life in the Ruins: International Law as Doctrine and Discipline
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Routledge Handbook of International Law and the Humanities. - Abingdon : Routledge. - 9780367420741 ; , s. 36-44
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this chapter I examine how the monastic order as a historical predecessor has shaped the discipline of international law and discuss the problems relating to the discipline’s attempts at secularisation. I argue that we should pursue a type of research which emphasises the process of secularisation in its practice, empirical as well as theoretical. Such an approach to research will not be able to limit itself to one area of knowledge but will be an interdisciplinary practice that simultaneously examines its disciplinary pre-conditions as well as the research matter. On this basis, I interpret the originality criterion as relating to the researcher’s ability to let the origin – Latin’s origo – emerge, rather than a display of personal creativeness.
|
|
| 67. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964
(författare)
-
Med AI som vapen? Att förståframtidens krigföringsmetoder
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Kvinnor för fred. - 0280-8447. ; 2022:April, s. 16-17
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Vi står i början av en ny epok: artificiell intelligens (AI) och digitalisering medför en fundamental förändring av hur krig förs. Fredsrörelsen utmanas av denna förändring, eftersom militära användningar av AI och digitalisering är svåra att greppa och bedöma. Jagmenar att det var ett misstag att rikta in debatten på så kallade killer robots. Istället bör vi diskutera den militära potentialen av AI och digitalisering ihela sin bredd för att förstå vilken svår uppgift både forskare och civila samhället står inför.
|
|
| 68. |
- Noll, Gregor
(författare)
-
Negotiating Asylum. The EU acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection
- 2000
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- How are access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? What tools does international law offer to solve conflicts between them? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the foundational oppositions embedded in migration and asylum issues? This work combines the potential of legal formalism with an analytical framework drawing on political theory. It analyses the argumentative strategies used by international lawyers, exploiting the interpretative methodology of international law as well as elaborate discrimination arguments. Taking the axiomatic tension between universalism and particularism as a point of departure, the author conceptualises the efforts to harmonise migration and asylum law in the European Union as the result of two interdependent negotiation loops: one taking place among Member States, and another between protection seekers and their host state. An extensive survey of the EU acquis and its institutional framework leads to the conclusion that both are heavily fragmented. The EU acquis contains not a single binding instruments securing the interests of protection seekers, while instruments enhancing migration control are fraught with legal and practical idiosyncrasies. Burden-sharing remains the pivotal element in the normative dynamics behind the EU acquis, and the various efforts of Member States to launch solidarity schemes are exposed to a critical analysis. After confronting the acquis with protective norms of international law, the author concludes that the deflection of protection seekers by means of visa requirements may constitute a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, and that the prescriptions of international law oblige Member States to apply the Dublin Convention and the Spanish Protocol in a manner which ultimately empties the law of its main control functions. He also develops an explicatory model reconstructing the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in the field of extraterritorial protection. In the final part, the argumentative interdependencies between universalism and particularism are explored, and the author explains why the European Court of Human Rights must be regarded as the most legitimized forum for the negotiation of asylum in Europe.
|
|
| 69. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964
(författare)
-
Negotiating Asylum. The EU Acquis, Extraterritorial Protection and the Common Market of Deflection
- 2021
-
Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- How is access to asylum and other forms of extraterritorial protection regulated in the European Union? Is the EU acquis in these areas in conformity with international law? Which tools does international law offer to solve collisions between both? And, finally, is law capable of bridging the foundational oppositions embedded in migration and asylum issues? This work combines the potential of legal formalism with an analytical framework drawing on political theory. It analyses the argumentative strategies used by international lawyers, and developed them further, exploiting the interpretative methodology of international law as well as elaborate discrimination arguments. The author concludes that deflecting protection seekers by means of visa requirements may constitute a violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, and that the prescriptions of international law oblige Member States to apply the Dublin Convention and the Spanish Protocol in a manner emptying it of its main control functions. The author also shows that burden-sharing remains the pivotal element in the normative dynamics behind the EU acquis, and explains why the European Court of Human Rights must be regarded as the only transnational forum for the legitimate negotiation of asylum in Europe.
|
|
| 70. |
|
|
