551. |
- Rasmussen, A. M., et al.
(författare)
-
Repeatability of diffusion-based stiffness prediction – A healthy volunteer study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Radiography. - 1078-8174 .- 1532-2831. ; 30:2, s. 524-530
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: The study investigated the repeatability of brain diffusion-based stiffness prediction (DWIstiff) in healthy volunteers. Methods: Thirty-one healthy volunteers were examined with DWIstiff using two different sets of b-values: b200-1500 s/mm2 (DWIstiff, 1500) and b200-1000 s/mm2 (DWIstiff, 1000). Each b-value set was scanned twice per imaging session without repositioning the participants. DWIstiff images were reconstructed from each set. Two observers delineated regions of interest (ROIs) on each DWIstiff image. The repeatability coefficient (RC), coefficient of variation (CV), inter- and intraobserver agreement were calculated. Results: After excluding three participants due to image artifacts, the study included twenty-eight volunteers (mean age (range)) 37 years (24–62), 10 males, 18 females). For DWIstiff, 1500, the lowest and the highest RCs were in the parietal lobe (0.52) and respectively the brain stem (1.17). The lowest RC for DWIstiff, 1000 was in the frontal lobe (0.42) and the highest in the brain stem (1.58). The CV for whole brain measurements was 3.83 % for DWIstiff, 1500 and 4.93 % for DWIstiff, 1000. The Bland‒Altman (BA) limits of agreement (LoA) for the intraobserver agreement of DWIstiff, 1500 were −0.90 to 1.06 and respectively −0.78 to 0.88 for DWIstiff, 1000. Regarding interobserver agreement, the LoA were −0.85 to 0.94 for DWIstiff, 1500 and −0.61 to 0.66 for DWIstiff, 1000. Conclusion: DWIstiff is a precise technique with some observer dependence. Repeatability is higher for DWIstiff, 1000 s/mm2 than for DWIstiff 1500 s/mm2. Implications for practice: Our findings suggest that DWIstiff can reliably detect stiffness changes larger than 4.93 % in healthy volunteers. Further studies should investigate whether the repeatability of DWIstiff may be affected by the presence of pathology such as a brain tumor.
|
|
552. |
- Rasmussen, Bodil, et al.
(författare)
-
Letter to the editor
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Advanced Nursing. - 0309-2402 .- 1365-2648. ; 79:7, s. 2774-2775
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
553. |
|
|
554. |
- Rasmussen-Barr, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Are job strain and sleep disturbances prognostic factors for low-back pain? : A cohort study of a general population of working age in Sweden
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1650-1977 .- 1651-2081. ; 49:7, s. 591-597
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether job strain, i.e. a combination of job demands and decision latitude (job control), and sleep disturbances among persons with occasional low-back pain are prognostic factors for developing troublesome low-back pain; and to determine whether sleep disturbances modify the potential association between job strain and troublesome low-back pain. Methods: A population-based cohort from the Stockholm Public Health Cohort surveys in 2006 and 2010 (n = 25,167) included individuals with occasional low-back pain at baseline 2006 (n = 6,413). Through logistic regression analyses, potential prognostic effects of job strain and sleep disturbances were studied. Stratified analyses were performed to assess modification of sleep disturbances on the potential association between job strain and troublesome low-back pain. Results: Those exposed to job strain; active job (odds ratio (OR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1-1.6), or high strain (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.4) and those exposed to severe sleep disturbances (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.0), but not those exposed to passive jobs (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4) had higher odds of developing troublesome low-back pain. Sleep disturbances did not modify the association between job strain and troublesome low-back pain. Conclusion: These findings indicate that active job, high job strain and sleep disturbances are prognostic factors for troublesome low-back pain. The odds of developing troublesome low-back pain due to job strain were not modified by sleep disturbance.
|
|
555. |
- Rasmussen-Barr, E., et al.
(författare)
-
Are job strain and sleep disturbances prognostic factors for neck/shoulder/arm pain? : A cohort study of a general population of working age in Sweden
- 2014
-
Ingår i: BMJ Open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 4:7, s. e005103-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To study whether job strain, that is, psychological job demands and decision latitude, and sleep disturbances among persons with occasional neck/shoulder/arm pain (NSAP) are prognostic factors for having experienced at least one episode of troublesome NSAP, and to determine whether sleep disturbances modify the association between job strain and troublesome NSAP. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Stockholm, Sweden. Participants: A population-based cohort of individuals with occasional NSAP (n=6979) who answered surveys in 2006 and 2010. Outcome measures: Report of at least one episode of troublesome NSAP in 2010. Results: The ORs for troublesome NSAP at follow-up were in individuals exposed to passive jobs 1.2 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.4); to active jobs 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.5); to high strain 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.4); to mild sleep disturbances 1.4 (95% CI 1.3 to 1.6) and to severe sleep disturbances 2.2 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.0). High strain and active jobs were associated with having experienced at least one episode of troublesome NSAP during the previous 6 months in persons with sleep disturbances, but not in individuals without sleep disturbances. Conclusions: Our results indicate that high strain, active jobs and sleep disturbances are prognostic factors that should be taken into account when implementing preventive measures to minimise the risk of troublesome NSAP among people of working age. We suggest that sleep disturbances may modify the association between high strain and troublesome NSAP.
|
|
556. |
|
|
557. |
|
|
558. |
|
|
559. |
|
|
560. |
|
|