SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Wiecek A) "

Search: WFRF:(Wiecek A)

  • Result 41-50 of 58
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
41.
  •  
42.
  •  
43.
  • Viggiano, D, et al. (author)
  • Mild cognitive impairment and kidney disease: clinical aspects
  • 2020
  • In: Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1460-2385. ; 35:1, s. 10-17
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
  •  
44.
  • Vincenti, F., et al. (author)
  • Prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus and glucose metabolism in patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion versus tacrolimus after de novo kidney transplantation
  • 2005
  • In: Transplantation proceedings. - 0041-1345. ; 37:2, s. 1001-4
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is associated with increased risk of graft failure and death in renal transplant recipients. Some clinical studies have indicated that NODM risk is higher with tacrolimus than cyclosporine, but no comparative trial has used American Diabetic Association (ADA)/World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Incidence After Renal Transplantation, Neoral C2 Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus (DIRECT) study is a 6-month open-label, multicenter trial comparing the impact of tacrolimus and Neoral (cyclosporine microemulsion) on glucose metabolism in 700 de novo kidney transplant recipients, based on ADA/WHO criteria. Patients are randomized to tacrolimus (C0 monitoring) or Neoral (C2 monitoring), stratified by baseline diabetic status and ethnicity. All patients receive basiliximab, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate acid (myfortic). Pooled interim 3-month results from a subset of 115 patients receiving either tacrolimus or Neoral showed that the primary efficacy end-point (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss or death) occurred in 11 patients (10%). There were four graft losses and only one death, which occurred after graft loss. Eight patients experienced BPAR (7.3%). Among 99 patients who were nondiabetic at baseline, 14 developed NODM by month 3, 17 developed impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and another 5 patients received hypoglycemic treatment for at least 14 consecutive days or at the month 3 visit, resulting in a 36% incidence of impaired glucose metabolism. At 3 months, median GFR (Nankivell) was 63.7 mL/min; median serum creatinine was 137 micromol/L. Full complete results are expected in December 2005.
  •  
45.
  • Baigent, Colin, et al. (author)
  • The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection) : a randomised placebo-controlled trial
  • 2011
  • In: The Lancet. - 0140-6736 .- 1474-547X. ; 377:9784, s. 2181-2192
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background Lowering LDL cholesterol with statin regimens reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and the need for coronary revascularisation in people without kidney disease, but its effects in people with moderate-to-severe kidney disease are uncertain. The SHARP trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of simvastatin plus ezetimibe in such patients. Methods This randomised double-blind trial included 9270 patients with chronic kidney disease (3023 on dialysis and 6247 not) with no known history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation. Patients were randomly assigned to simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily versus matching placebo. The key prespecified outcome was first major atherosclerotic event (non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, non-haemorrhagic stroke, or any arterial revascularisation procedure). All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00125593, and I SRCTN54137607. Findings 4650 patients were assigned to receive simvastatin plus ezetimibe and 4620 to placebo. Allocation to simvastatin plus ezetimibe yielded an average LDL cholesterol difference of 0.85 mmol/L (SE 0.02; with about two-thirds compliance) during a median follow-up of 4.9 years and produced a 17% proportional reduction in major atherosclerotic events (526 [11.3%] simvastatin plus ezetimibe vs 619 [13.4%] placebo; rate ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94; log-rank p=0.0021). Non-significantly fewer patients allocated to simvastatin plus ezetimibe had a non-fatal myocardial infarction or died from coronary heart disease (213 [4.6%] vs 230 [5.0%]; RR 0.92,95% CI 0.76-1.11; p=0.37) and there were significant reductions in non-haemorrhagic stroke (131 [2.8%] vs 174 [3.8%]; RR 0.75,95% CI 0.60-0.94; p=0.01) and arterial revascularisation procedures (284 [6.1%] vs 352 [7.6%]; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; p=0.0036). After weighting for subgroup-specific reductions in LDL cholesterol, there was no good evidence that the proportional effects on major atherosclerotic events differed from the summary rate ratio in any subgroup examined, and, in particular, they were similar in patients on dialysis and those who were not. The excess risk of myopathy was only two per 10 000 patients per year of treatment with this combination (9 [0.2%] vs 5 [0.1%]). There was no evidence of excess risks of hepatitis (21 [0.5%] vs 18 [0.4%]), gallstones (106 [2.3%] vs 106 [2.3%]), or cancer (438 [9.4%] vs 439 [9.5%], p=0.89) and there was no significant excess of death from any non-vascular cause (668 [14.4%] vs 612 [13.2%], p=0.13). Interpretation Reduction of LDL cholesterol with simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily safely reduced the incidence of major atherosclerotic events in a wide range of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.
  •  
46.
  •  
47.
  • Feehally, J, et al. (author)
  • Tonsillectomy in a European Cohort of 1,147 Patients with IgA Nephropathy
  • 2016
  • In: Nephron. - : S. Karger AG. - 2235-3186 .- 1660-8151. ; 132:1, s. 15-24
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • <b><i>Background:</i></b> Tonsillectomy has been considered a treatment for IgA nephropathy (IgAN). It is aimed at removing a source of pathogens, reducing mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and decreasing polymeric IgA synthesis. However, its beneficial effect is still controversial. In Asia, favorable outcomes have been claimed mostly in association with corticosteroids. In Europe, small, single-center uncontrolled studies have failed to show benefits. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The European validation study of the Oxford classification of IgAN (VALIGA) collected data from 1,147 patients with IgAN over a follow-up of 4.7 years. We investigated the outcome of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and/or 50% loss of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the annual loss of eGFR in 61 patients who had had tonsillectomy. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Using the propensity score, which is a logistic regression model, we paired 41 patients with tonsillectomy and 41 without tonsillectomy with similar risk of progression (gender, age, race, mean blood pressure, proteinuria, eGFR at renal biopsy, previous treatments and Oxford MEST scores). No significant difference was found in the outcome. Moreover, we performed an additional propensity score pairing 17 patients who underwent tonsillectomy after the diagnosis of IgAN and 51 without tonsillectomy with similar risk of progression at renal biopsy and subsequent treatments. No significant difference was found in changes in proteinuria, or in the renal end point of 50% reduction in GFR and/or ESRD, or in the annual loss of eGFR. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In the large VALIGA cohort of European subjects with IgAN, no significant correlation was found between tonsillectomy and renal function decline.
  •  
48.
  • Kammer, Michael, et al. (author)
  • Integrative analysis of prognostic biomarkers derived from multiomics panels helps discrimination of chronic kidney disease trajectories in people with type 2 diabetes
  • 2019
  • In: Kidney International. - : Elsevier BV. - 0085-2538. ; 96:6, s. 1381-1388
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Clinical risk factors explain only a fraction of the variability of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline in people with type 2 diabetes. Cross-omics technologies by virtue of a wide spectrum screening of plasma samples have the potential to identify biomarkers for the refinement of prognosis in addition to clinical variables. Here we utilized proteomics, metabolomics and lipidomics panel assay measurements in baseline plasma samples from the multinational PROVALID study (PROspective cohort study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for VALIDation of biomarkers) of patients with incident or early chronic kidney disease (median follow-up 35 months, median baseline eGFR 84 mL/min/1.73 m2, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio 8.1 mg/g). In an accelerated case-control study, 258 individuals with a stable eGFR course (median eGFR change 0.1 mL/min/year) were compared to 223 individuals with a rapid eGFR decline (median eGFR decline -6.75 mL/min/year) using Bayesian multivariable logistic regression models to assess the discrimination of eGFR trajectories. The analysis included 402 candidate predictors and showed two protein markers (KIM-1, NTproBNP) to be relevant predictors of the eGFR trajectory with baseline eGFR being an important clinical covariate. The inclusion of metabolomic and lipidomic platforms did not improve discrimination substantially. Predictions using all available variables were statistically indistinguishable from predictions using only KIM-1 and baseline eGFR (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.63). Thus, the discrimination of eGFR trajectories in patients with incident or early diabetic kidney disease and maintained baseline eGFR was modest and the protein marker KIM-1 was the most important predictor.
  •  
49.
  •  
50.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 41-50 of 58

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view