| 21001. |
- Rönn, Magnus, 1950-, et al.
(author)
-
Key concepts, Criteria and Quality Judgment in Architecture
- 2007
-
Conference paper (other academic/artistic)abstract
- This article deals with issues related to theory/practice and professionals/layman in architectural competitions. The data is based from experience in Finland. Architectural competitions have been institutionalized since the end of the 19:th century and they are an important part of the architect’s profession. Despite this, there are few scientific studies made on this topic. Due to this, we hade done an Investigative survey in Finland.The article is based on interviews, studies of competition material and literature. A special follow-up has been made on the competitions held during the years of 1999 and 2000; to get a picture of to what degree the winning competition proposals have been implemented. Seven persons with first hand experience from competitions have been interviewed. They represent the architect’s organization, the arranger and the competitors.The presentation of the results from the completed interviews follows the different stages in the competition process. From the initial stage of bringing forward a competition programme for the task, through the judging of the entries into the final stage of presentation of an opinion from the jury. The task of the jury in architectural competitions is to find the best proposal among the entries. The judgement of the entries is a process where the jury appoint good proposals. Competence and consensus are two essential factors that make the jury feel comfortable in the final choice of a winner of an architectural competition.
|
|
| 21002. |
- Rönn, Magnus, 1950-
(author)
-
Kritikens roll i arkitekttävlingar :
- 2010
-
In: Kritik. - Stockholm : Analys förlag. - 1654-7969. ; :11, s. 64-76
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Syftet med denna artikel är att presentera en teori om kvalitetsbedömningar i arkitekturtävlingar. Hypotesen är att kvalitetsfrågor kan prövas på ett trovärdigt sätt genom en arkitekturkritisk arbetsmetod. Jag vill visa på vilka grunder som professionella juryledamöter pekar ut vinnare i arkitekturtävlingar, en sammantaget bästa helhetslösning på tävlingsuppgiften. Arkitekturkritiken är en erfarenhetsbaserad kunskapsform som kommer till uttryck vid gestaltning, bedömning och redovisning av arkitektur- och stadsbyggnadsprojekt. Kritik uppträder i detta sammanhang på tre sätt; som designverktyg för arkitekterna på kontoret vid utveckling av förslag, som arbetsmetod vid granskningen av lösningar av gestaltningsproblem och som skriftliga omdömen om arkitektur- och stadsbyggnadsprojektens kvaliteter.
|
|
| 21003. |
- Rönn, Magnus, 1950-
(author)
-
Kritikens roll i tävlingar
- 2010
-
In: Kritik. - : Analys förlag. - 1654-7969. ; :11, s. 64-76
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 21004. |
- Rönn, Magnus
(author)
-
Markanvisningstävling i Göteborg : En pilotstudie om gestaltning, byggande och boendekostnader
- 2016
-
Reports (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Denna fallstudie undersöker en markanvisningstävling i Göteborg från 2013. Målet för tävlingen var att utveckla bra och billiga bostäder. 13 designteam konstruerade av arkitekter, byggföretag och förvaltare deltog i tävlingen. 10 designteam lyckades att producera förslag som uppfyllde hyreskravet. Ur denna synvinkel framstår tävlingen som framgångsrik. Genomförandet av tävlingsförslaget visade sig dock vara problematiskt. Det finns tre nyckelaktörer i tävlingen: arrangören, juryn med bedömningsgrupp samt designteamen. Syftet med fallstudien är att bidra med kunskap om tävlingen som verktyg för utveckling av bostadsprojekt. Med stöd av tävlingsdokumenten kunde 65 informanter identifieras hos nyckelaktörerna i tävlingen. 53 av dessa har besvarat ett formulär med öppna frågor om markanvisningstävlingen i Göteborg. Svaren ger tillsammans med analysen av tävlingsdokumenten en god bild av tävlingen. Resultaten från fallstudien sammanfattas i åtta övergripande slutsatser som diskuterar följande teman: Markanvisningstävlingen som en form för tävlande, tävlingen som verktyg för politiska ambitioner, spridningen av information om tävlingen, konstruktion av designteam, motiv för tävlande, programkrav som hinder och inspiration, innovationer, tävlingserfarenheter.
|
|
| 21005. |
- Rönn, Magnus, 1950-
(author)
-
Markanvisningstävling i Stockholm - En fallstudie om innovation i arkitektur och bostadsbyggande
- 2017
-
Reports (other academic/artistic)abstract
- This case study examines one developer competition organized in Stockholm in 2013. The general objective of the competition was to develop good and cheap housing. 15 design teams involving architects, constructors and real estate managers took part in the competition. The jury compared two different design proposals in the final judgment, one with separate rooms linked to common space and one consisting of small housing units. The jury decided that the proposal with small housing units should be a winner in the competition. There are three typical key players in the Stockholm competition: the organizer, the jury and the design teams. This competition was run by the city. The organizer was responsible for the competition policy and the terms in the brief. The task for the jury was to single out a winner. The consultants and building sector responded to the task by organizing design teams and developing design proposals. This abstract is a short summary. But what can we learn from the key players in the competition? The developer competition in Stockholm has been investigated in a case study. The purpose was to contribute knowledge about the competition as a tool for the development of design solutions. The objective in the competition was to create good housing design and affordable apartments by effective use of space. Research data have been collected in this case study through archive studies, close reading of competition documents, questionnares to jury members and the design teams (builders, developers and architects). 22 architectural students at The Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm have studied the competition in a course. Their task was to point out the five best design proposals based on the brief and among these pick a winner. I have compared how the professional jury evaluated the proposals with jury reports from the students. The students had the proposal with common space for collective living as winner. The professional jury chose to place this design proposal as number two in their evaluation. The competition has been studied from the design teams’ perspective and the organizers’ point of view. The results have been summarized in ten conclusions of general interest for the key players. They are dealing with issues such as the nature of judging criteria, sorting and ranking design proposals, marketing of the competition, uncertainty, motives for competing, innovation and the competition as a tool for political ambition from the public organizers.
|
|
| 21006. |
|
|
| 21007. |
|
|
| 21008. |
|
|
| 21009. |
- Rönn, Magnus, 1950-
(author)
-
Prekvalificering – arkitekttävling vs markanvisningstävling
- 2012
-
Reports (other academic/artistic)abstract
- This report presents result from a research project on prequalification in restricted com-petitions. Three restricted architectural competitions are compared with three restricted de-veloper competitions in the research project. The competition task includes both senior hous-ing and ordinary apartments. All the six competitions have been organized by the public sec-tor in Sweden. The overall aim was to describe and understand how organizers select design teams for restricted competitions. The methodology includes inventory of competitions, case studies, document reviews and interviews of 20 members in the organizers’ selection committees. The organizer starts prequalification by inviting candidates to competitions. General con-ditions, submission requirements and criteria for the evaluation of applications are parts of an established practice. Demands in the invitation refer to requirements in the procurement law. Criteria for evaluations are based in professional practice. This is the case both for architect-tural and developer competitions. One important difference between architectural competitions and developer competitions is the number of applications. The three architectural competitions generated 120 applications from architecture firms. The organizer invited 11 design teams (9%). The three developer competitions attracted 21 applications from constructing companies and real estate managers. 16 became invited (76%). The selecting committees had only one meeting for choosing can-didates in developer competitions. In architectural competitions the selection committees used three to four meetings. The procedure for selection was based on (a) identifying differences in professional quality, (b) personal preference and (c) scoring merits. Choosing candidates in the developer competitions was much more simplified, which can be explained by the less number of applicants.
|
|
| 21010. |
- Rönn, Magnus, 1950-
(author)
-
Prekvalificering - att utse arkitekter till inbjudna tävlingar
- 2011
-
Reports (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Denna rapport handlar om prekvalificering. Det är ett urvalsförfarande som används av byggherrar och beställare vid inbjudna arkitekttävlingar. Prevalificeringen börjar med att arrangören har fram en inbjudan och annonserar om tävlingen. I inbjudan ges en översiktlig presentation av tävlingsuppgiften, de designkriterier (utvärderingskriterier) som ska läggas till grund för valet av kandidater till tävlingen och vilka dokument som måste bifogas ansökan. Arkitektkontor (designteam) som vill delta i tävlingen svarar på inbjudan med att skicka in en intresseanmälan (ansökan) med efterfrågade handlingar. En grupp personer hos arrangören (urvalsgrupp) går sedan igenom kandidaternas meriter och pekar ut lämpliga kontor/team. Mellan 3-6 arkitektkontor blir vanligen inbjudna till tävlingen. Så ser i korthet prekvalificerade arkitekttävlingar ut i Sverige arrangerade av kommunala och statliga kommunala huvudmän.
|
|
