51. |
- Allard, Christina
(författare)
-
Aktivitet: Opponent på en lic.avhandling
- 2013
-
Annan publikation (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Licentiate thesis “Governing Ecologies. Species protection in overlapping and contiguous legal regimes” by Yaffa Epstein
|
|
52. |
|
|
53. |
|
|
54. |
|
|
55. |
|
|
56. |
|
|
57. |
|
|
58. |
|
|
59. |
- Allard, Christina, 1971-, et al.
(författare)
-
Girjas Reindeer Herding Community v. Sweden : Analysing the Merits of the Girjas Case
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Arctic Review on Law and Politics. - Oslo : Cappelen Damm AS. - 1891-6252 .- 2387-4562. ; 12, s. 56-79
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- For the first time in the Swedish Supreme Court, a small Sami reindeer herding community has won an important victory affirming the community’s small game hunting and fishing rights. Because of protracted use and the concept of immemorial prescription, the Court recognised the community’s exclusive hunting and fishing rights, including the right to lease these rights to others. Such leases have long been prohibited by legislation and the State has retained its powers to administer such leases. This case signifies a considerable development in the area of Sami law. In its decision, the Supreme Court made some adjustments to the age-old doctrine of immemorial prescription, and provided insights into how historic evidence should be evaluated when the claimant is an Indigenous people. A common motivator for these adjustments is an enhanced awareness of international standards protecting Indigenous peoples and minorities. Even ILO Convention No. 169 – the only legally binding convention concerning Indigenous rights, but which Sweden has not yet ratified – is relevant when it comes to evaluating Sami customary uses. The Court addressed the problem of gaps in the historical material and used evidence from other parts of Swedish Lapland and adjacent time-periods, making reasonable assumptions to fill in these gaps. The Court imposes on the State the burden of proof regarding the extinguishment of already established Sami rights, as well as proof that extinguishment by legislation or expropriation, is “clear and definitive”. These conditions were not met in this case.
|
|
60. |
- Allard, Christina, 1971-, et al.
(författare)
-
Girjas sameby mot staten: En analys av Girjasdomen
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Svensk Juristtidning. - : Föreningen för utgivande av Svensk Juristtidning. - 0039-6591. ; :5, s. 429-452
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- I januari 2020 avgjorde Högsta domstolen det s.k. Girjasmålet, där rätten att upplåta småviltsjakt och fiske i fjällområdena prövats. Stridigheter om huruvida det är staten eller samebyn som har rätt att göra sådana upplåtelser har pågått i decennier och har inte gått att lösa politiskt. I artikeln analyseras domen och vilka konsekvenser den får; domens längd och komplexitet motiverar en längre rättsfallsanalys. Det konstateras att domen klargör viktiga förhållanden såsom att samiska markrättigheter upparbetats genom urminnes hävd och att ILO:s konvention nr 169 om urfolks rättigheter i delar är bindande även om den inte har ratificerats. Domen innebär att en betydande rättsutveckling skett inom det samerättsliga området.
|
|