| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
- Ervo, Laura, 1966-
(författare)
-
Conclusions
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Current trends in preparatory proceedings. - : Springer. - 9783319293257 ; , s. 233-245
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
- Ervo, Laura, 1966-
(författare)
-
Constitution, Judiciary and Public Powers Structure : Finnish Perspective
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual. - : Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. - 1982-7636. ; 21:1, s. 207-226
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This papers analyses the main contents of the Finland Constitution and the Judiciary. Finland Constitution is the basis of all legislation. It exercises of government power, and it details the fundamental rules, values and principles of Finnish democracy. According to the Constitution, judicial power lies with independent courts of law. The courts are independent: they are bound only by the law in force. Finnish procedural law has been both internationalized and constitutionalized since the 1990s and the result of court proceedings plays a more significant role for the parties.
|
|
| 15. |
- Ervo, Laura, 1966-
(författare)
-
Corona-jurisdiction in Finland
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Septentrio Reports. - Tromsø, Norway : The Arctic University of Norway. - 2387-4597. ; :5, s. 20-22
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 16. |
- Ervo, Laura, 1966-
(författare)
-
Culture and Mentality in East-Nordic Courts
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Rethinking Nordic Courts. - Cham : Springer. - 9783030748500 - 9783030748517 ; , s. 89-106
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this chapter, the East-Nordic, that is Finnish and Swedish, court culture and mentality and its historical, cultural and societal roots are explored. The objective of the chapter is to uncover the mechanisms underlying the East-Nordic court mentality and the hallmarks of Swedish and Finnish court culture, as well as to identify how these processes influence adjudication. Emphasis is put on the historical development of these countries, since Finland was part of Sweden until 1809. After Finland became an autonomous Grand Dutchy of the Russian Empire, it suffered under Russification, whereas Sweden was still part of the western sphere. Even after Finland gained independence in 1917, the history of the two countries has differed to some extent. Therefore, it is interesting to explore the manner in which the differences in history are manifested in contemporary court proceedings. This study is based mainly on comparative and historical resources.
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
| 18. |
|
|
| 19. |
- Ervo, Laura, 1966-
(författare)
-
Debtor protection and enforcement efficiency according to Finnish law
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Access to Justice in Eastern Europe (AJEE). - : AJEE Journal. - 2663-0575 .- 2663-0583. ; :4, s. 265-282
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Human rights/ human considerations have started to carry more weight nowadays, especially in enforcement matters. Both rehabilitative and social aims in legal matters have been strengthened during recent decades. At the same time, increasingly intensive instruments to handle artificial arrangements and fraudulent debtors have emerged. Thus, the question arises whether the enforcement system embodies a creditor-biased or a debtor-biased framework. The present article debates this question in the context of Finnish legislation, focusing on two perspectives of the Finnish enforcement system: How are debtors protected? How can we ensure that the enforcement is efficient?
|
|
| 20. |
- Ervo, Laura, 1966-, et al.
(författare)
-
Delays in civil proceedings : comparative studies between Finland and Sweden
- 2014
-
Ingår i: The Future of Civil Litigation. - : Springer. - 9783319044644 ; , s. 249-280
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this chapter, we will compare the length of proceedings in Finland and Sweden . In contrast to Sweden, one of the big problems in Finland is delays in court procedures. In fact, Finland has received many violations alleging the country has violated Article 6 of the European Convention for Human Rights because of the delays, while in Sweden the same violations are far less. Interestingly, the procedural systems and main principles are almost identical in Sweden and Finland, which is grounded in a common history during an important period in the development of the Finnish legal judiciary. Therefore, it is poignant to ponder a reason for this factual difference—especially given that there does not seem to be any significant differences in resources. Our hypothesis on the main explanatory factors is that the reason might be, on one hand, in the different court culture and, on the other hand, in the recent developments in the Swedish civil litigation, the so-called more modern proceedings reform (EMR). In Finland, the recent solutions have been the new possibility to pay compensation for delays in the judicial proceedings and the possibility to request for urgent consideration of the matter. The tools used in Finland differ, therefore, from the Swedish ones. The named reasons and differences are discussed in this article
|
|
