21. |
- Engel, Annegret, et al.
(författare)
-
Is This Completely M.A.D.? Three Views on the Ruling of the German FCC on 5th May 2020
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Nordic Journal of European Law. - : Nordic Journal of European Law, Lund University. - 2003-1785. ; 3:1, s. 128-150
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This brief note, on the Bundesverfassungsgericht’s Weiss judgment of 5th May 2020, highlights three implications of the German Federal Constitutional Court’s landmark ruling and its constitutional significance with implications for the wider context of Member States’ cooperation in the EU and European integration as a whole. We explain the relevant background of the judgment and argue that the specific issue created by the judgment might be addressed quickly but that the resulting judicial turmoil for the broader relationship between the law of the EU and the Member States can only be remedied by treaty changes in the longer term in order to avoid the Mutually Assured Destruction (M.A.D.).
|
|
22. |
|
|
23. |
|
|
24. |
|
|
25. |
|
|
26. |
|
|
27. |
- Gill-Pedro, Eduardo, et al.
(författare)
-
Immunity or Community? : Security in the European Union
- 2019
-
Ingår i: The Future of Europe : Legal and Political Integration Beyond Brexit - Legal and Political Integration Beyond Brexit. - 9781509923311
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This chapter sets out the argument that the securitization of the EU, in particular through the development of the area of freedom, security and justice, has transformed the EU project, and moved it away from a logic of community to a logical of immunity. These concepts of ‘community’ (communitas) and ‘immunity’ (immunitas) are derived from the writing of the Italian philosopher, Roberto Esposito. The point of the chapter is not give a detailed exposition of Esposito’s philosophy, but merely to appropriate the concepts advanced by him and apply them as heuristic devices in order to think critically about the securitization of the EU’s area of freedom, security and justice. I argue that, as a immunitarian project, the EU has left its ‘special path’, and can no longer be justified to the member states or to the citizens under a logic of community. I conclude by observing that there is an inherent contradiction in a project which seeks to further European integration by adopting a logic of immunity.
|
|
28. |
|
|
29. |
|
|
30. |
|
|