| 1. |
- Berggren, Peter, 1971-, et al.
(författare)
-
Statistical modelling of team training in a microworld study
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. - : Sage Publications. - 2169-5067. ; , s. 894-898
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- A command and control environment is a dynamic and complex setting with complicated technical systems where teams of operators interact to reach shared goals. This study presents an experiment in which we, by means of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), explain the relations between basic concepts of command and control environments: mental workload, frustration, situational awareness, and performance. This paper reports a LISREL analysis of the Baroutsi, Berggren, Nählinder, & Johansson (2013) data. From that data, a new latent variable “Frustration” emerges, which now can be included in the model.
|
|
| 2. |
- Brenner, Björn, 1979-
(författare)
-
The Deradicalization of Islamists by Islamists : Hamas's Kid Glove Approach to Salafi Jihadists in the Gaza Strip, 2010-2015
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Strategic Assessment. - Tel Aviv. - 0793-8942. ; 20:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Hamas administration in the Gaza Strip first set out to crush the area’s Salafi jihadist groups by force. Once Hamas realized that the Salafi jihadi problem was more serious than it had first anticipated, however, Hamas’s approach shifted gradually, from a strategy of attempted elimination to one of containment and assimilation. Indeed, several of the pursued militants proved to be former colleagues from the Qassam Brigades who had grown disillusioned with Hamas and defected to fringe groups. This article examines how Hamas, as part of a new and progressive approach, aimed to rehabilitate these individuals by enrolling them in a prison-based deradicalization program that sought to appeal to a common ideological and religious base in Islam, treating Salafi jihadists as patients rather than as common criminals.
|
|
| 3. |
- Persson Tyrling, Stephan, 1954-
(författare)
-
En försvarsmakt i förändring och anpassning : Ofreden vinns mellan krigen
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Kungl Krigsvetenskapsakademiens Handlingar och Tidskrift. - Stockholm : Kungl. Krigsvetenskapsakademien. - 0023-5369. ; :3, s. 141-148
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Israels erfarenheter efter det andra Libanonkriget år 2006 ledde omedelbart till ett beslut om att reformera hela den israeliska försvarsmakten, IDF. Tidigare vald väg, där lågintensiv krigföring var tydligt framträdande inom utbildning och materielanskaffning, visade sig under nämnda krig vara felaktig[1]. Förbanden saknade förmåga att strida mot en organiserad fiende med avancerad taktik och effektiva kort- och långräckviddiga vapen. Försvarsmakten inledde direkt efter kriget en omfattande reform som initialt genomfördes under två år, men som är under fortsatt utveckling.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Paglia, Eric, 1970-
(författare)
-
The Shock of the Anthropocene
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Environment and history. - : WHITE HORSE PRESS. - 0967-3407 .- 1752-7023. ; 24:2, s. 294-296
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Bousquet, Antoine
(författare)
-
Time Zero: Hiroshima, September 11 and Apocalyptic Revelations in Historical Consciousness
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Millennium. - : SAGE Publications. - 0305-8298 .- 1477-9021. ; 34:3, s. 739-764
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article considers the place of the Hiroshima bombing and the September 11 attacks as singular acts of violence constituting major points of rupture in the historical consciousness and chronological narratives of the Western world: Ground Zero is Time Zero. Geographically and temporally delineated instances of intense death and destruction, both acts have been construed as moments when the world `changed for ever'. Our schemata of interpretation — the mental frameworks through which we impose meaning and continuity on the world around us and determine the range of our expectations — were violently overthrown by those events, shattered by images that exceed our minds' capabilities of re presentation and symbols that challenge our liberal metanarratives of ineluctable progress. By bringing to the fo re their aesthetic dimension and reading them through the lens of the Kantian notion of the sublime, we can grasp those events in their original intensity as overwhelming revelatory experiences. Apocalyptic both in their imagery and the meaning attributed to them, those unprecedented acts of terror re p resent turning-points in our reconstituted historical narratives, marking a culmination of history leading to it as well as the start of a new era in which it is proclaimed that many previous assumptions no longer hold.
|
|
| 10. |
- Erdeniz, Robert
(författare)
-
Approaches to Operational Art Revisited : Theoretical and Practical Implications of Methodology
- 2016
-
Ingår i: 21st International Command and Control Reserach and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS). - : International Command and Control Institute. ; , s. 1-32
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- U.S. doctrines have introduced a third approach within Operational Art, called the design approach, which has evoked military professional and academic debate as well as influenced NATO doctrines. Allied Joint Doctrine for Operational-level Planning (AJP 5) states that a Force Commander should choose one out of three approaches when conducting Operational Art and conducting operational planning: a traditional (causalist), a systemic or a design approach. The difference between the causalist- and the systemic- approach concerns the clash between reductionism and holism, but the difference between the design- and the systemic- approach is methodologically vague. Hence the following question concerning methodology and Operational Art arises:What methodological implications could constitute an argument for choosing the design approach when conducting Operational Art within a battlespace?Neither NATO doctrine, planning framework nor previous research offer any explicit methodological argument for choosing, or preferring, the design- over the systemic- approach. This article concludes that one possible argument for preferring a design approach is adherence to value-focused thinking, but this requires that the Force Commander can and is willing to focus on stakeholders’ values within the battlespace. This conclusion is implied by two methodological implications identified and discussed in this article. If the design approach is to be a relevant option, then further conceptual development, experimentation and education is required. To conclude, NATO should review the description of their approaches within Operational Art since the argument for preferring one approach over another is lacking and this could hamper the Force Commander’s management of the battlespace.
|
|
