1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Arwill-Nordbladh, Elisabeth, 1947
(författare)
-
From metal to mystery: Approaches to the study of gold and goldsmiths in 1st millennium Europe
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Germania. - 0016-8874. ; 94:1-2, s. 259-267
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The article is a discussion of an edited volume, Goldsmith Mysteries edited by Alexandra Pesch and Ruth Blankenfeldt (2012), the proceedings of a workshop about gold smiths and non ferrous metallurgy in Europe in the first millennium AD. The discussion follows the volume's approach, raising issues such as important research questions, historical and anthropological considerations, empirical evidence and narratives based on images.
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
- Hägerdal, Hans, 1960-
(författare)
-
Svenska studier i Öst- och Sydöstasiens historia
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Orientaliska Studier. - Stockholm : Stockholm University. - 0345-8997. ; 142, s. 24-39
-
Forskningsöversikt (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The article discusses the emergence of historical research about East and Southeast Asia in Sweden in the course of the 20th and early 21st centuries.
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
- Tjeder, David, 1972-
(författare)
-
1800-talets borgerliga erfarenheter
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Historisk Tidskrift. - 0345-469X .- 2002-4827. ; 126:3, s. 501-508
-
Forskningsöversikt (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
- Dragan, Weronika, et al.
(författare)
-
Between history, politics and economy: The problematic heritage of former border railway stations in Poland
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft. - 0029-9138. ; 161, s. 229-250
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper deals with the issue of former border railway stations (FBRSs) in Poland in the context of their problematic heritage. Since the creation of those borders coincided with the development of the railway network in the 19th century, the FBRSs, now deprived of their past function, remain scattered throughout the landscape as confusing components of a troubled history in an even more confusing contemporaneity. This article assiduously analyses the FBRSs in their capacity as offensive hallmarks vested in inoffensive elements of technical culture, often with high aesthetic value. This is done by departing from a number of analytical lenses: unwanted history, competitive heritage, utility vs. economy, politics and money, and the 'here and now' policy. These competing perspectives reveal the intricacy of heritagisation, especially in times of greater ease of obtaining monetary funds aimed at revitalisation: what to revitalise, why and how?
|
|