| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
-
Human Population : Västerås 2020
- 2020
-
Konstnärligt arbete (refereegranskat)abstract
- I Human Population tar konstnären med en grupp deltagare på en guidad tur genom stadscentrum. Framför olika byggnader och på gator breder hon ut en stor genomskinlig byggplast på marken.Ett frottage (en gnuggbild) med pastellkrita växer fram och synliggör markens struktur. Samtidigt berättar Torell om tillgänglighet som en mänsklig rättighet. Om rösträtt och inkludering. Om asfalt mot vågiga betongplattor - inte för att de är dekorativa, utan för riktningarna de skapar för den som har nedsatt syn. (Katrin Ingelstedt/Västerås konstmuseum)
|
|
| 5. |
- Holmqvist Sten, Katrin, 1971-
(författare)
-
Arkitekturen och universitetet
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Konstvandring på Umeå universitet. - Umeå : Umeå universitet; Akademiska hus; Statens konstråd. - 9789176010358 ; , s. 108-119
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Burman, Christo
(författare)
-
Osynligheten tar vid där ruinerna slutar
- 2005
-
Ingår i: À Derrida x 13. - : Institutionen för konstvetenskap, Umeå universitet: Umeå. - 917305884X ; , s. S. 59-63
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
- Foka, Anna, 1981-, et al.
(författare)
-
Beyond humanities qua digital : Spatial and material development for digital research infrastructures
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. - Oxford : Oxford University Press. - 2055-7671 .- 2055-768X. ; 33:2, s. 264-278
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Universities around the world have increasingly turned to digital infrastructures as a way to revamp the arts and humanities. This article contributes a fresh understanding by examining the material development of HumlabX, a research laboratory for digital humanities at Umeå University, Sweden. Specifically, we approach the empirical case as a timeline of research funding, projects, events, and deliverables to examine how the research laboratory as an organizational and material space developed and evolved in relation to new technology investments. Based on our analysis, we argue that while digital research infrastructures can, indeed, stimulate innovation in and around research, aimed to produce new knowledge, digital technologies carry social and material implications that affect organizational processes. We show that while knowledge production processes at HumlabX were highly influenced by the infrastructural legacy of the past, they indeed directed scholars toward innovation. By discussing these implications in detail, we move beyond the debate of humanities qua digital, and demonstrate the need for scholars of digital humanities to engage in the development of policies for digital research infrastructures. Using a Swedish case study, we argue that research laboratories for the digital humanities must be scrutinized and should be fully exposed as socio-material organizations that develop, and should develop, over time. In particular, we stress the need to ensure that digital humanities laboratories are sustainable and open for redevelopment.
|
|
| 9. |
-
Rome and the guidebook tradition : from the Middle Ages to the 20th century
- 2019
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)abstract
- Almost everyone has used a guidebook, when travelling or in the armchair at home. But how and when was the guidebook born? In this book, seven scholars from various disciplines argue that the guidebook emerged in Rome in the late Middle Ages, to form a surprisingly consistent model for guidebooks up to our time. The descriptions of must-see monuments, recommended routes, practical information and value-laden instructions have guided travellers to Rome through more than 1000 years.
|
|
| 10. |
- van Toorn, Roemer, 1960-
(författare)
-
The power of gentleness in architecture : towards an aesthetics of hospitality
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Transformations 2022 in artistic research. - : Luleå University; Swedish Research council. ; , s. 24-25
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The Power of Gentleness in Architecture. Towards an Aesthetics of HospitalityThe last decades the discourse of sustainability has expanded towardsother related approaches on the built environment in architecture theory and practice. These relational perspectives can be characterized by a move away from the architectural object itself towards a focus on the processes through which the architectural object is materialized, produced, con- structed, maintained, demolished, recycled, renovated, and experienced. Reconsidering architecture from these relational sustainable perspectives (of social - and ecological care), is of extreme and urgent importancegiven the multifaceted crisis of care today, but unfortunately the question of aesthetics has disappeared by reducing architecture to a by-product of processes, materials, and technologies. By neglecting the question of the aesthetics, it is underestimated how essential the visual, experiential, haptic and bodily engagement are for its users, architects and alike. The inevita- ble questions of affection, perception, beauty, joy and happiness need to be considered as intrinsically linked with sustainable issues for society and its different cultures as a whole.With my new research “The power of Gentleness in Architecture. The Aesthetics of Hospitality,” I aim to document, explore, define, and theo- rize how a particular aesthetics of hospitality can emerge and be devel- oped towards a sustainable future of social and ecological care by looked at exemplary contemporary and historical architecture practices and the different lifeworld’s that are created under influence of migration. Such sustainable practices of architecture are effective through both their in- novate material and technical solutions as well as their aesthetic regime, enabling the configurating of new experiences that create new modes of sense perception while inducing novel forms of social and political sub- jectivity beneficial for both the individual, society as a whole. It is about an approach and aesthetics how you can dance with enmeshment within the constraints of a particular time, in other words can enable provisional freedom by means of an aesthetic regime.In simple terms it comes down to an open architecture; one incorporating multiple voices, backgrounds, and ethnicities empowered through its sus- tainable aesthetic regime redistributing the sensible. It is about a research wishing to make a case for an architecture that accommodates and fosters diversity, liveliness, and unpredictability, in stark opposition to over-deter- mination, exclusion. Its gentleness is about a power that is also soft, a nobil- ity that is also humble, a sweetness that is also intelligent, a subtlety that is nevertheless striking. Gentleness is about a fragility and complexity that has the potential to subvert and change the status quo, a micro-politics of specu- lative construction towards an open, ecological, and socially just future.
|
|
