| 1. |
- Sahlin, Nils-Eric, et al.
(författare)
-
It's values that matter
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Science and Proven Experience : Johannes - Johannes. - 9789198357554 ; , s. 77-86
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 2. |
- Freeling, Anthony, et al.
(författare)
-
Combining evidence
- 1983
-
Ingår i: Evidentiary value : philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory : essays dedicated to Sören Halldén on his sixtieth birthday. - 0459-2603. - 914004873X ; 15, s. 58-74
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Gärdenfors, Peter, et al.
(författare)
-
Varför skall vi minnas våra beslut?
- 1993
-
Ingår i: Huvudinnehåll : 12 filosofiska uppsatser. - 9188248305 ; , s. 189-205
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 6. |
- Sahlin, Nils-Eric, et al.
(författare)
-
Do people combine evidence according to an evidentiary value model?
- 1983
-
Ingår i: Evidentiary value : philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory : essays dedicated to Sören Halldén on his sixtieth birthday. - 0459-2603. - 914004873X ; 15, s. 98-103
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 7. |
- Sahlin, Nils-Eric, et al.
(författare)
-
Ethical aspects of valuing lives
- 1994
-
Ingår i: Future Risks and Risk Management. - 0792330579 ; , s. 93-124
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
- Persson, Johannes, et al.
(författare)
-
Science and proven experience : a Swedish variety of evidence based medicine and a way to better risk analysis?
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Risk Research. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1366-9877 .- 1466-4461. ; 22:7, s. 833-843
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A key question for evidence-based medicine (EBM) is how best to model the way in which EBM should‘[integrate] individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence’. We argue that the formulations and models available in the literature today are modest variations on a common theme and face very similar problems when it comes to risk analysis, which is here understood as a decision procedure comprising a factual assessment of risk, the risk assessment, and the decision what to do based on this assessment, the risk management. Both the early and updated models of evidence-based clinical decisions presented in the writings of Haynes, Devereaux and Guyatt assume that EBM consists of, among other things, evidence from clinical research together with information about patients’ values and clinical expertise. On this A-view, EBM describes all that goes on in a specific justifiable medical decision. There is, however, an alternative interpretation of EBM, the B-view, in which EBM describes just one component of the decision situation (a component usually based on evidence from clinical research) and in which, together with other types of evidence, EBM leads to a justifiable clincial decision but does not describe the decision itself. This B-view is inspired by a 100-years older version of EBM, a Swedish standard requiring medical decision-making, professional risk-taking and practice to be in accordance with‘science and proven experience’(VBE). In the paper, we outline how the Swedish concept leads to an improved understanding of the way in which scientific evidence and clinical experience can and cannot be integrated in light of EBM. How scientific evidence and clinical experience is integrated influences both the way we do risk assessment and risk management. In addition, the paper sketches the as yet unexplored historical background to VBE and EBM.
|
|
| 9. |
- Sahlin, Nils-Eric
(författare)
-
Vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet : Slutrapport från ett forskningsprogram
- 2021
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Forskningsprogrammet "Vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet" tilldelades anslag av Stiftelsen Riksbankens Jubileumsfond 2015. Vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet är ett minst sagt viktigt begrepp. Via olika lagar påverkar det våra myndigheter, Det påverkar oss som yrkesutövare och som medborgare. Samtidigt är det något oklart med vad som avses. Vad menas med vetenskap? Vems eller vilkas beprövade erfarenhet talar vi om och hur omfattande ska den vara för att anses vara beprövad? Prövas både vetenskap och beprövad erfarenhet? Eller räcker endera? Detta är programmets slutrapport.
|
|
| 10. |
- Hermerén, Göran, et al.
(författare)
-
Value uncertainty and value instability in decision-making
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Liber Amicorum Pascal Engel. - 9782839915625 ; , s. 100-110
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to clarify the role of value uncertainty and value instability in decision-making that concerns morally controversial issues. Value uncertainty and value instability are distinguished from moral uncertainty, and several types of value uncertainty and value instability are defined and discussed. The relations between value uncertainty and value instability are explored, and value uncertainty is illustrated with examples drawn from the social sciences, medicine and everyday life. Several types of factor producing value uncertainty and/or value instability are then identified. They are grouped into three categories and discussed under the headings ‘value framing’, ‘ambivalence’ and ‘lack of self-knowledge’. The paper then discusses the role of value uncertainty in decision-making. The concluding remarks summarize what has been achieved and what remains to be done in this area.
|
|
