| 1. |
- Gedeborg, Rolf, et al.
(författare)
-
Susceptibility to SARS-Cov-2 infection and risk for severe COVID-19 in patients with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy
- 2022
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cancer. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0020-7136 .- 1097-0215. ; 151:11, s. 1925-1934
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been hypothesized to protect against COVID-19, but previous observational studies of men with prostate cancer on ADT have been inconsistent regarding mortality risk from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Using data from the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe), we identified a cohort of 114 547 men with prevalent prostate cancer on the start of follow-up in February 2020, and followed them until 16 December 2020 to evaluate the association between ADT and time to test positive for COVID-19. Among men testing positive for COVID-19, we used regression analyses to estimate the association between ADT and risk of COVID-19-related hospital admission/death from any cause within 30 days of the positive test. In total, 1695 men with prostate cancer tested positive for COVID-19. In crude analyses, exposure to ADT was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of both testing positive for COVID-19 infection and subsequent hospital admission/death. Adjustment for age, comorbidity and prostate cancer risk category substantially attenuated the associations: HR 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1-1.5) for testing positive for COVID-19, and OR 1.4 (95% CI: 1.0-1.9) for risk of subsequent hospital admission/death. In conclusion, although these results suggest increased risks of a positive COVID-19 test, and COVID-19-related hospital admission/death in men on ADT, these findings are likely explained by confounding by old age, cancer-associated morbidity and other comorbidities being more prevalent in men on ADT, rather than a direct effect of the therapy.
|
|
| 2. |
- Carlsson, Sigrid, 1982, et al.
(författare)
-
Population-based study of long-term functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment
- 2016
-
Ingår i: BJU International. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 117:6B, s. E36-E45
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term urinary, sexual and bowel functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment at a median follow-up of 12 years (IQR 11-13).PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this nationwide, population-based study, we identified from the National Prostate Cancer Register, Sweden, 6,003 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (clinical local stage T1-2, any Gleason score, prostate specific antigen < 20 ng/mL, NX or N0, MX or M0) between 1997 and 2002 who were ≤70 years at diagnosis. 1,000 prostate cancer-free controls were selected, matched for age and county of residence. Functional outcomes were evaluated with a validated self-reported questionnaire.RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 3,937/6,003 cases (66%) and 459/1,000 (46%) controls. Twelve years post diagnosis, at a median age of 75 years, the proportion of cases with adverse symptoms was 87% for erectile dysfunction or sexually inactive, 20% for urinary incontinence and 14% for bowel disturbances. The corresponding proportions for controls were 62%, 6% and 7%, respectively. Men with prostate cancer, except those on surveillance, had an increased risk of erectile dysfunction, compared to control men. Radical prostatectomy was associated with increased risk of urinary incontinence (odds ratio; OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.83-2.86] and radiotherapy increased the risk of bowel dysfunction (OR 2.46 [95% CI 1.73-3.49]) compared to control men. Multi-modal treatment, in particular including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), was associated with the highest risk of adverse effects; for instance radical prostatectomy followed by radiotherapy and ADT was associated with an OR of 3.74 [95 CI 1.76-7.95] for erectile dysfunction and OR 3.22 [95% CI 1.93-5.37] for urinary incontinence.CONCLUSION: The proportion of men who suffer long-term impact on functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment was substantial.
|
|
| 3. |
- Gedeborg, Rolf, et al.
(författare)
-
Androgen deprivation therapy and excess mortality in men with prostate cancer during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: PLOS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 16:10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Men have a higher risk of death from COVID-19 than women and androgens facilitate entrance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into respiratory epithelial cells. Thus, androgen deprivation therapy may reduce infection rates and improve outcomes for COVID-19. In the spring of 2020, Sweden was highly affected by COVID-19. The aim was to estimate the impact of androgen deprivation therapy on mortality from COVID-19 in men with prevalent prostate cancer by comparing all-cause mortality in the spring of 2020 to that in previous years.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden all men with prostate cancer on March 1 each year in 2015-2020 were followed until June 30 the same year. Exposure to androgen deprivation therapy was ascertained from filled prescriptions for bicalutamide monotherapy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH), or bilateral orchidectomy.RESULTS: A total of 9,822 men died in March-June in the years 2015-2020, of whom 5,034 men were on androgen deprivation therapy. There was an excess mortality in 2020 vs previous years in all men. The crude relative mortality rate ratio for 2020 vs 2015-2019 was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.04) in men on GnRH, and 0.90 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.05) in men on bicalutamide monotherapy. After multivariable adjustment these ratios were attenuated to 1.00 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.12) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.12), respectively. When restricting the analysis to the regions with the highest incidence of COVID-19 or to the time period between 2 April to 10 June when mortality in 2020 was increased >30% compared to previous years, the results were similar to the main analysis.CONCLUSIONS: In this large national population-based cohort of men with prevalent prostate cancer, there was no clear evidence in support for an effect of androgen deprivation therapy on COVID-19 mortality.
|
|
| 4. |
- Loeb, Stacy, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk of localized and advanced prostate cancer among immigrants versus native-born Swedish men: a nation-wide population-based study.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Cancer causes & control : CCC. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1573-7225 .- 0957-5243. ; 24:2, s. 383-390
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and prognosis vary geographically. We examined possible differences in PCa risk by clinical risk category between native-born and immigrant populations in Sweden. Our hypothesis was that lower PSA-testing uptake among foreign-born men would result in lower rates of localized disease, and similar or higher risk of metastatic disease. METHODS: Using the Prostate Cancer database Sweden, we identified 117,328 men with PCa diagnosed from 1991 to 2008, of which 8,332 were foreign born. For each case, 5 cancer-free matched controls were randomly selected from the population register. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare low risk, intermediate risk, high risk, regionally metastatic, and distant metastatic PCa based upon region of origin. RESULTS: Across all risk categories, immigrants had significantly lower PCa risk than native-born Swedish men, except North Americans and Northern Europeans. The lowest PCa risk was observed in men from the Middle East, Southern Europe, and Asia. Multivariable adjustment for socioeconomic factors and comorbidities did not materially change risk estimates. Older age at immigration and more recent arrival in Sweden were associated with lower PCa risk. Non-native men were less likely to be diagnosed with PCa through PSA testing during a health checkup. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for all stages of PCa was lower among first-generation immigrants to Sweden compared with native-born men. Older age at immigration and more recent immigration were associated with particularly low risks. Patterns of PSA testing appeared to only partly explain the differences in PCa risk, since immigrant men also had a lower risk of metastatic disease.
|
|
| 5. |
- Thomsen, Frederik B., et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostic Implications of 2005 Gleason Grade Modification. Population-Based Study of Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Wiley. - 0022-4790 .- 1096-9098. ; 114:6, s. 664-670
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To assess the impact of the 2005 modification of the Gleason classification on risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients and Methods: In the Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe), 2,574 men assessed with the original Gleason classification and 1,890 men assessed with the modified Gleason classification, diagnosed between 2003 and 2007, underwent primary RP. Histopathology was reported according to the Gleason Grading Groups (GGG): GGG1 = Gleason score (GS) 6, GGG2 = GS 7(3+4), GGG3 = GS 7(4+3), GGG4 = GS 8 and GGG5 = GS 9-10. Cumulative incidence and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess difference in BCR. Results: The cumulative incidence of BCR was lower using the modified compared to the original classification: GGG2 (16% vs. 23%), GGG3 (21% vs. 35%) and GGG4 (18% vs. 34%), respectively. Risk of BCR was lower for modified versus original classification, GGG2 Hazard ratio (HR) 0.66, (95% CI 0.49-0.88), GGG3 HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.38-0.88) and GGG4 HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.29-0.94). Conclusion: Due to grade migration following the 2005 Gleason modification, outcome after RP are more favourable. Consequently, outcomes from historical studies cannot directly be applied to a contemporary setting.
|
|
| 6. |
- Thomsen, Frederik B., et al.
(författare)
-
Risk of malignant melanoma in men with prostate cancer : Nationwide, population-based cohort study
- 2016
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cancer. - : Wiley. - 0020-7136 .- 1097-0215. ; 138:9, s. 2154-2160
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- An increased risk of malignant melanoma has been observed in men with prostate cancer. To assess potential shared risk factors and confounding factors, we analysed risk of melanoma in men with prostate cancer including information on tumor characteristics and demographics including socioeconomic status. In The Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden, risk of melanoma was assessed in a cohort of men with prostate cancer and in a comparison cohort of prostate-cancer free men. Data on prostate cancer risk category, melanoma stage, basal cell carcinoma, location of residency, and socioeconomic status were obtained from nationwide registers. Melanoma was diagnosed in 830/108,145 (0.78%) men with prostate cancer and in 3,699/556,792 (0.66%) prostate cancer-free men. In multivariable Cox regression models, men with prostate cancer had a significantly increased risk of melanoma (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.27), and so had married men, men with high education and income, and men residing in southern Sweden. The strongest associations were observed for stage 0 melanoma in men with low-risk prostate cancer (HR 1.45, 1.14-1.86), high education (HR 1.87, 1.60-2.18) and top income (HR 1.61, 1.34-1.93), respectively, whereas there was no association between these factors and late-stage melanoma. Men with prostate cancer also had an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma (HR 1.18, 1.15-1.22). In conclusion, men with low-risk prostate cancer, high education, high income and residency in southern Sweden had an increased risk of early-stage melanoma. What's new? Men with a history of prostate cancer are at increased risk of melanoma, an association suspected of arising from a common mechanism of androgen exposure. Other factors, however, including tumor characteristics and socioeconomic factors, may also play a role. In this population-based study in Sweden, among men with prostate cancer, melanoma risk was found to be greatest for low-risk prostate tumors. The association was exclusive to early-stage melanoma. Risk of basal cell carcinoma was also elevated among men with prostate cancer. The findings throw new light on potential shared risk factors between prostate cancer and skin malignancies.
|
|
| 7. |
- Pekala, Kelly R., et al.
(författare)
-
Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions
- 2024
-
Ingår i: NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY. - 1759-4812 .- 1759-4820. ; 21, s. 329-338
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Decisions around prostate-specific antigen screening require a patient-centred approach, considering the benefits and risks of potential harm. Using shared decision-making (SDM) can improve men's knowledge and reduce decisional conflict. SDM is supported by evidence, but can be difficult to implement in clinical settings. An inclusive definition of SDM was used in order to determine the prevalence of SDM in prostate cancer screening decisions. Despite consensus among guidelines endorsing SDM practice, the prevalence of SDM occurring before the decision to undergo or forgo prostate-specific antigen testing varied between 11% and 98%, and was higher in studies in which SDM was self-reported by physicians than in patient-reported recollections and observed practices. The influence of trust and continuity in physician-patient relationships were identified as facilitators of SDM, whereas common barriers included limited appointment times and poor health literacy. Decision aids, which can help physicians to convey health information within a limited time frame and give patients increased autonomy over decisions, are underused and were not shown to clearly influence whether SDM occurs. Future studies should focus on methods to facilitate the use of SDM in clinical settings. In this Review, the authors discuss shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening in terms of definition, prevalence and methods, including decision aids. Facilitators and barriers to shared decision-making are also discussed. Shared decision-making (SDM) about prostate-specific antigen screening should be collaborative between patients and physicians, and should consist of eliciting patients' preferences, providing evidence-based information about risks and benefits, and reaching a values-concordant choice.The use of SDM for prostate cancer screening is suggested by guideline groups, but SDM remains underused.Facilitators to SDM include a consistent clinician-provider relationship, trust in the clinician, having a partner, and high education level.Barriers to SDM include limited appointment times, insufficient knowledge, poor health literacy, any barrier to communication, and physician beliefs about screening.Decision aids can help to improve patients' knowledge and facilitate SDM, but are rarely used in clinical practice.
|
|
| 8. |
- Bratt, Ola, et al.
(författare)
-
Upper limit of cancer extent on biopsy defining very low-risk prostate cancer
- 2015
-
Ingår i: BJU International. - : Wiley. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 116:2, s. 213-219
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective To investigate how much Gleason pattern 3 cancer prostate biopsy specimens may contain without an increased risk of undetected more aggressive cancer, compared with the risk for cancers fulfilling the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for very low-risk prostate cancer. Patients and Methods We identified 1286 men aged <70 years in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden who underwent primary radical prostatectomy (RP) for stage T1c or T2 prostate cancer with Gleason pattern <= 3 only, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of <10 ng/mL and a PSA density of <0.15 ng/mL/mL. The association between the extent of cancer in the biopsies (the number and proportion of positive cores and the total cancer length in the cores in millimetres) and the likelihood of Gleason pattern 4-5 in the RP specimen was analysed with logistic regression. Results In all, 438 (34%) of the 1286 men had Gleason pattern 4-5 in the RP specimen. Increasing number and proportion of positive biopsy cores, as well as increasing biopsy cancer length were both significantly associated with increased risk of upgrading at RP in univariable analysis, but in multivariable analysis only biopsy cancer length remained significant. The 684 men with stage T1c and < 8 mm cancer had similar risk of upgrading regardless of whether the number of positive biopsy cores was 1-2 or 3-4 (28% vs 27% risk); upgrading was more common among the remaining men (40%, P < 0.01). Conclusions Men aged < 70 years with stage T1c prostate cancer and 3-4 biopsy cores with Gleason pattern 3 are not more likely to have undetected Gleason pattern 4-5 cancer than men with 1-2 cores with cancer, provided that the total biopsy cancer length is < 8 mm. We propose that the definition of very low-risk prostate cancer is widened accordingly.
|
|
| 9. |
- Danneman, Daniela, et al.
(författare)
-
Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens : nationwide trends 2000-2012
- 2017
-
Ingår i: BJU International. - : Wiley. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 119:1, s. 50-56
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives To investigate how well the Gleason score in diagnostic needle biopsies predicted the Gleason score in a subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen before and after the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revision of Gleason grading, and if the recently proposed ISUP grades 1-5 (corresponding to Gleason scores 6, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 8 and 9-10) better predict the RP grade. Patients and Methods All prostate cancers diagnosed in Sweden are reported to the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR). We analysed the Gleason scores and ISUP grades from the diagnostic biopsies and the RP specimens in 15 598 men in the NPCR who: were diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 with clinical stage T1-2 M0/X prostate cancer on needle biopsy; were aged <= 70 years; had serum PSA concentration of < 20 ng/mL; and underwent a RP < 6 months after diagnosis as their primary treatment. Results Prediction of RP Gleason score increased from 55 to 68% between 2000 and 2012. Most of the increase occurred before 2005 (nine percentage points; P < 0.001); however, when adjusting for Gleason score and year of diagnosis in a multivariable analysis, the prediction of RP Gleason score decreased over time (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; P < 0.002). A change in the ISUP grades would have led to a decreasing agreement between biopsy and RP grades over time, from 68% in 2000 to 57% in 2012, with an OR of 0.95 in multivariable analysis (P < 0.001). Conclusion Agreement between biopsy and RP Gleason score improved from 2000 to 2012, with most of the improvement occurring before the 2005 ISUP grading revision. Had ISUP grades been used instead of Gleason score, the agreement between biopsy and RP grade would have decreased, probably because of its separation of Gleason score 7 into ISUP grades 2 and 3 (Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 4 + 3).
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
