| 1. |
- Persson, Mats, et al.
(författare)
-
Svensk juridik
- 2017
-
Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Svensk juridik är en grundläggande lärobok i juridik där författarna på ett modernt, pedagogiskt och överskådligt sätt beskriver stora delar av det svenska rättssystemet. Boken går förhållandevis djupt för att vara en grundläggande lärobok, samtidigt som författarna lagt ner mycket arbete på att anpassa texten till modernt språkbruk. En mängd exempel och förklarande skisser gör det komplicerade mer lättillgängligt. Författarnas ambition är inte endast att läsaren ska få förståelse för juridiken utan även vinna insikt om hur juridiken används och fungerar i praktiken.
|
|
| 2. |
- Fåhraeus, David, et al.
(författare)
-
The European Health Data Space : Challenges and Opportunities
- 2024
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In her 2020 State of the Union address, the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a new legislative proposal to create a European Health Data Space. Its aim is to make electronic health data accessible in order to support healthcare delivery, health research, innovation, effective policymaking and regulation, and personalised medicine. This European Policy Analysis examines the Commission’s proposal and its implications for patients, healthcare providers, market actors and national administrations.The analysis shows that the Commission’s Proposal has significant potential benefits for a wide range of stakeholders. However, concerns still remain regarding aspects such as the empowerment of individuals in relation to their data, adjustments that will need to be made by the healthcare sector, incentives for innovation, and trust in EU governance. At the time of writing, the European Parliament and the Council have adopted their negotiating positions. However, a number of changes are likely to be introduced before the Commission’s Proposal is agreed and can be implemented in the Member States.
|
|
| 3. |
-
GDPR and Biobanking : Individual Rights, Public Interest and Research Regulation across Europe
- 2021
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)abstract
- This open access book focuses on the discrepancies in biobank research regulations that are among the most significant hurdles to effective research collaboration. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has established stringent requirements for the processing of health and genetic data, while simultaneously allowing considerable multi-level exceptions for the purposes of scientific research. In addition to directly applicable exceptions, the GDPR places the regulatory responsibility for further defining how the Member States strike a balance between the individuals' rights and the public interest in research within their national legal orders. Since Member States' approaches to the trade-off between data subjects' rights on the one hand, and appropriate safeguards on the other, differ according to their ethical and legal traditions, their data protection requirements for research also differ considerably.This study takes a comprehensive approach to determine how the GDPR affects regulatory regimes on the use of personal data in biobanking research, with a particular focus on the balance between individuals' rights, public interest and scientific research. In this regard, it has two main goals: first, to scrutinize the GDPR research regime, its objective and constitutive elements, the impact it has on biobanking, and its role in a changing EU landscape post-Brexit; and second, to examine how various exceptions have been operationalized nationally, and what challenges and opportunities this diversification entails. The book not only captures the complexity GDPR creates for biobanking, but also sheds light on various approaches to tackling the corresponding challenges. It offers the first comprehensive analysis of GDPR for biobanking, and the most up-to-date overview of the national biobank regulatory frameworks in Europe.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Slokenberga, Santa, et al.
(författare)
-
EU data transfer rules and African legal realities : is data exchange for biobank research realistic?
- 2019
-
Ingår i: International data privacy law. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2044-3994 .- 2044-4001. ; 9:1, s. 30-48
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Key PointsTo effectively collaborate in biobanking and build capacity in low and middle-income countries, data transfer from European Union (EU) Member States to states in Africa is crucial.Although under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) avenues for data transfer exist, the ones feasible for transcontinental data exchange for biobank research rely on EU enforcement which in essence means limited oversight possibilities and, consequently, considerable risks to the EU data subject’s privacy.To ensure effective data protection for data subjects in biobanking, raising the data protection bar in data recipient countries is crucial. Although Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Uganda have taken considerable steps towards developing data protection frameworks, only that of South Africa and Nigeria’s Protection of Personal Information Bill seem to be such to meet the protection level set out by the GDPR. The legislative initiatives in Kenya and Uganda require revisions to ensure that protection of privacy is not undermined when data are being sent to these countries.Currently, considerable responsibility is placed in the hands of the legislatures in the countries of concern—and notably in Kenya, and Uganda—to set foundations for ending research and research integrity-harming practices. In Nigeria, these foundations are defined in the Protection of Personal Information Bill, but not adopted yet. South Africa, however, has taken a big step towards building routes for genuine biobank capacity-building in the country and collaboration in that regard.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Chamberlain, Johanna, 1989-, et al.
(författare)
-
Supervision of Artificial Intelligence in the EU and the Protection of Privacy
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Florida International University Law Review. - Getzville, New York. - 2643-7767 .- 2643-7759. ; 17:2, s. 267-285
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In this paper, the supervisory regime in the proposed EU General Regulation on AI will be analyzed, with the aim to critically assess the role of supervisory authorities with regards to AI systems in safeguarding both the development of AI systems and protecting democratic and individual rights. As with other supervisory structures in EU law, such as data protection and financial market law, the proposed network is to consist of an agency at the EU level, the new European Artificial Intelligence Board (EAIB), as well as supervisory authorities located at the national level. These regulatory and supervisory administrative structures can be identified as a part of the success story described as the Brussels effect, where EU regulatory regimes on data protection have had a global impact. However effective, can a network of independent supervisory authorities be trusted to effectively monitor the use of developing AI systems and at the same time balance the benefits and risk of the new technologies with the fundamental rights of privacy, data protection, freedom of information, and non-discrimination? Considering the largely unknown, dynamic character of AI, the central democratic function of freedom of information, and the individual right to privacy and data protection, the question must be asked if there is a limit to how much power it is reasonable to bestow on these networks of supervisory authorities.
|
|
| 8. |
- Chamberlain, Johanna, et al.
(författare)
-
The Relationship Between Damages and Administrative Fines in the EU General Data Protection Regulation
- 2019
-
Ingår i: SSRN Electronic Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 1556-5068.
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Two purposes of the GDPR are to provide effective remedies for ensuring extensive personal data rights and to change practices and policies of controllers and processors so that they become more aware of privacy protection. Article 58 GDPR lays down the investigative and corrective powers of the national supervisory authorities, such as issuing warnings or imposing new administrative fines. Article 79 GDPR states that every data subject whose rights according to the regulation have been infringed shall have access to an effective remedy. The two measures in focus here are those with the largest economic impact: Article 82 on damages and Article 83 on administrative fines. These articles target different areas and subjects – while the first has a compensatory purpose and is designed for use by individuals, the second has a preventive character and is implemented by Data Protection Authorities vis-á-vis controllers and processors. Considering these two profiles, an interesting question arises: Why are the provisions of Article 83 for imposing fines on companies and organisations so detailed, while the wording of Article 82 and hence the liability for controllers and processors is open to interpretation? What does this difference lead to in the application of the regulation, and more precisely, is it likely that the development in regards to administrative fines could spill over to the application of rules on damages?
|
|
| 9. |
- Dahlqvist, Julia, et al.
(författare)
-
Swedish Constitutional Response to the Coronavirus Crisis The Odd One Out?
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Pandemocracy in Europe. - Oxford : Bloomsburry publishing. - 9781509946365 ; , s. 135-154
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The Swedish response to the coronavirus crisis has, at least initially, deviated from those in most other comparable countries and the Swedish strategy has gained attention worldwide. Only a few binding restrictive measures have been enacted and the Swedish model has, at least initially, been to mostly rely on informal and voluntary measures based on recommendations from the Public Health Agency (PHA). No lockdowns, as in mass quarantines or stay-at-home orders, or mandatory mask wearing have, as of February 2021, been introduced. However, during the ‘second wave’ of the pandemic, in Autumn 2020, the strategy somewhat changed and new restrictions have gradually been introduced. The development brought to light the need for new legislative tools and at the beginning of 2021 the Swedish Parliament, the Riksdag, enacted the temporary COVID-19 Act, delegating further powers to the Government. It may be submitted that the constitutional framework, in essence, has been respected. However, the strong position of Swedish public authorities in the area of communicable diseases, together with the vast delegation of powers to the Government, has in practice impacted on the traditional division of tasks for implementing policies in a manner unprecedented in modern Swedish constitutional history.
|
|
| 10. |
- Gholami, Ali, et al.
(författare)
-
Design and Implementation of the advanced cloud privacy threat modeling
- 2016
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications. - 0975-2307 .- 0974-9330. ; 8:2, s. 103-122
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Privacy-preservation for sensitive data has become a challenging issue in cloud computing. Threat modeling as a part of requirements engineering in secure software development provides a structured approach for identifying attacks and proposing countermeasures against the exploitation of vulnerabilities in a system. This paper describes an extension of Cloud Privacy Threat Modeling (CPTM) methodology for privacy threat modeling in relation to processing sensitive data in cloud computing environments. It describes the modeling methodology that involved applying Method Engineering to specify characteristics of a cloud privacy threat modeling methodology, different steps in the proposed methodology and corresponding products. In addition, a case study has been implemented as a proof of concept to demonstrate the usability of the proposed methodology. We believe that the extended methodology facilitates the application of a privacy-preserving cloud software development approach from requirements engineering to design.
|
|
