SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Booleska operatorer måste skrivas med VERSALER

Träfflista för sökning "AMNE:(SOCIAL SCIENCES Business and economics) ;lar1:(cth);pers:(Granstrand Ove 1944)"

Sökning: AMNE:(SOCIAL SCIENCES Business and economics) > Chalmers tekniska högskola > Granstrand Ove 1944

  • Resultat 1-10 av 25
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Holgersson, Marcus, 1983, et al. (författare)
  • The evolution of intellectual property strategy in innovation ecosystems: Uncovering complementary and substitute appropriability regimes
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: Long range planning. - : Elsevier BV. - 0024-6301 .- 1873-1872. ; 51:2, s. 303-319
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In this article, we attempt to extend and nuance the debate on intellectual property (IP) strategy, appropriation, and open innovation in dynamic and systemic innovation contexts. We present the case of four generations of mobile telecommunications systems (covering the period 1980-2015), and describe and analyze the co-evolution of strategic IP management and innovation ecosystems. Throughout this development, technologies and technological relationships were governed with different and shifting degrees of formality. Simultaneously, firms differentiated technology accessibility across actors and technologies to benefit from openness and appropriation of innovation. Our analysis shows that the discussion of competitiveness and appropriability needs to be expanded from the focal appropriability regime and complementary assets to the larger context of the innovation ecosystem and its cooperative and competitive actor relations, with dispersed complementary and substitute assets and technologies. Consequently, the shaping of complementary and substitute appropriability regimes is central when strategizing in dynamic and systemic innovation contexts. This holds important implications for the management of open innovation, innovation ecosystems, platforms, and coopetition.
  •  
2.
  • Granstrand, Ove, 1944, et al. (författare)
  • Managing the intellectual property disassembly problem
  • 2013
  • Ingår i: California Management Review. - : SAGE Publications. - 2162-8564 .- 0008-1256. ; 55:4, s. 184-210
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • This article deals with the intellectual property (IP) disassembly problem, which is an increasingly important problem in various contexts. The IP disassembly (IPD) problem is defined as the problem of finding a contractual arrangement for allocation of IP rights and licenses that allows for separating and disintegrating a business unit, company, project entity, or IP unit in order to enable a transaction, organizational transfer, or dissolution of it. Based on a comparative case study of corporate transactions of Saab Automobile and Volvo Car Corporation this article conceptualizes and characterizes the problem and then develops an IPD framework for managing it.
  •  
3.
  • Granstrand, Ove, 1944, et al. (författare)
  • The challenge of closing open innovation: the intellectual property disassembly problem
  • 2014
  • Ingår i: Research-Technology Management. - 0895-6308 .- 1930-0166. ; 57:5, s. 19-25
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • This article addresses one of the many unexplored challenges associated with closing open innovation—the intellectual property (IP) disassembly problem. This is the problem of disentangling and allocating IP rights at the closing or termination of an open innovation project or at the exit of one or more of the vital participants. IP disassembly problems may be mitigated (but not eliminated) through contingent contractual provisions at the IP assembly stage. Moreover, provisions can be made at both the assembly and disassembly stages to prepare for and benefit from subsequent IP reassembly in a sequence of project generations over time. An overriding implication is that IP management addressing both IP assembly and disassembly problems is necessary (although not sufficient) for effective governance of open innovation.
  •  
4.
  • Granstrand, Ove, 1944, et al. (författare)
  • Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition
  • 2020
  • Ingår i: Technovation. - : Elsevier BV. - 0166-4972. ; 90-91
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The concept of innovation ecosystems has become popular during the last 15 years, leading to a debate regarding its relevance and conceptual rigor, not the least in this journal. The purpose of this article is to review received definitions of innovation ecosystems and related concepts and to propose a synthesized definition of an innovation ecosystem. The conceptual analysis identifies an unbalanced focus on complementarities, collaboration, and actors in received definitions, and among other things proposes the additional inclusion of competition, substitutes, and artifacts in conceptualizations of innovation ecosystems, leading to the following definition: An innovation ecosystem is the evolving set of actors, activities, and artifacts, and the institutions and relations, including complementary and substitute relations, that are important for the innovative performance of an actor or a population of actors. This definition is compatible with related conceptualizations of innovation systems and natural ecosystems, and the validity of it is illustrated with three empirical examples of innovation ecosystems.
  •  
5.
  • Granstrand, Ove, 1944, et al. (författare)
  • The 25% rule revisited and a new investment-based method for determining FRAND licensing royalties
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: les Nouvelles. - 0270-174X. ; XLVII:3
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • This paper starts with briefly discussing the 25% rule and the argumentation for and against it. The paper continues with developing a new investment-based method for determining FRAND licensing royalties, a method not only applicable to one-to-one bilateral licensing deals but also to multilateral deals with multiple license sellers and multiple license buyers. The paper ends with discussing limitations and generalizations, opening up for further research.
  •  
6.
  • Granstrand, Ove, 1944 (författare)
  • Evolving properties of intellectual capitalism: Patents and innovations for growth and welfare
  • 2018
  • Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Intellectual capitalism is evolving, driving and driven by technological innovations and various forms of entrepreneruship. The purpose of this eagerly anticipated book is to analyze the linkages between R & D, patents, innovations, entrepreneurship and growth. Based on a large array of national empirical and policy studies, it elaborates on a comprehensive range of innovation and IP issues that are pertinent not only to Europe but to the world as a whole. These issues include the role of patents and licensing in the governance of technology and innovation, and the various uses and abuses of patents. It further elaborates on new IP phenomena in an increasingly patent-intensive world with patent-rich multinationals and patent-savvy new entrants from Asia. In a world facing challenges that call for innovative responses, the book contains a set of valuable policy recommendations for strengthening innovativeness for economic growth and ultimately for social value creation.
  •  
7.
  • Holgersson, Marcus, 1983, et al. (författare)
  • The importance of patents for innovation appropriation and open financing – a new view
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: R&D Management Conference. From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation. 3-6 July, Cambridge University..
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The role of patents for capturing (appropriating) value from innovation investments has since long been of major interest to both practitioners and academics. Previous studies have implicitly assumed that firms appropriate value through in-house creation and marketing of innovative products and services. We question this assumption in light of the variety of business models and strategies now being available, including open innovation. We develop a basic typology of appropriation strategies, and investigate the role patents play for different strategies among 172 Swedish technology based firms. The results show that the importance of patents has a skew distribution with many firms rating patents as very important and with a fat tail of firms rating patents less important. This partly explains the limited importance of patents that previous studies have communicated. The results also show that the protection of sales and sales margins of innovative products and services is only one function of patents, and that patents are also important for the sales of technologies and stocks. Thus, patenting widens the range of appropriation strategies as well as financing strategies available to R&D management, which is especially important for cash strung technology based start-ups and SMEs, as well as for large firms with long R&D times.
  •  
8.
  • Granstrand, Ove, 1944, et al. (författare)
  • The evolution of corporate entrepreneurship in Swedish industry - was Schumpeter wrong?
  • 1995
  • Ingår i: Journal of Evolutionary Economics. - 1432-1386 .- 0936-9937. ; 5:2, s. 133-156
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • This paper analyzes the evolution and role of corporate entrepreneurship in Swedish industry, particularly for the 1945-1980 period, based on data on the 100 economically most important innovations during this period. Privately owned large corporations (Schumpeter Mark II) dominated in launching innovations in almost all industrial sectors and in all subperiods but decreasingly so. 20% of the innovations were lauched by new firms (Schumpeter Mark I) but most of these new firms were spun-off and/or acquired by large corporations. State entrepreneurship was marginal. Universities played an important role, although sector-specific. New firms and existing firms had similar growth rates and almost identical and short gestation times to international markets for their innovations. 80% of the corporate innovations were product renewals rather than product diversifications or process innovations. No evidence of an evolution from autonomous over corporate to state entrepreneurship, as hypothesized by Schumpeter, was found. Evolution of a dynamic coexistence of these forms of entrepreneurship is hypothesized in this paper. The paper finally presents a model, synthesizing Schumpeter Mark I and II, for analyzing technological change and entrepreneurship.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Granstrand, Ove, 1944, et al. (författare)
  • Multinational technology and intellectual property management - Is there global convergence and/or specialisation?
  • 2014
  • Ingår i: International Journal of Technology Management. - 0267-5730 .- 1741-5276. ; 64:2-4, s. 117-147
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The paper gives various indications of market and technology diversification as well as of global market and technology convergence (rather than specialization) in the context of managerial, legal and economic convergence. The results show that different countries focus on a wider but increasingly similar set of markets for R&D outputs in form of patents, which implies increasing intra-national market diversification and inter-national market convergence. The results also show that different countries focus on a wider but increasingly similar set of technologies that are patented, which implies increasing intra-national technology diversification and inter-national technology convergence. In addition, intellectual property (IP) legal convergence takes place as newly industrialized countries (NICs) have strengthened their IP regimes in compliance with TRIPS and subsequently do so in the context of their indigenous innovation policies. Asian NICs have significantly increased their international patenting and supply of patented inventions. Altogether, this puts new demands across countries on multinational technology and innovation management skills, and in particular multinational IP management skills.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 25

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy