| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Perry, Elizabeth, Dr. 1975-
(författare)
-
Harmonising family law across borders in europe
- 2022. - 1
-
Ingår i: International survey of family law. - Cambridge : Intersentia. - 9781839702648 ; , s. 379-415
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This chapter provides family law experts worldwide with a glimpse into and an update on the latest changes in European family law, specifically to conflict of law rules for resolving European Union (EU) cross-border family law cases and most notably those regarding responsibility for children, marital dissolution and distribution of assets after death. Examined are EU-level legal developments affecting cross-border family relationships within the 27 nations of the European Union that have been introduced primarily through significant new EU legislation and by recent case decisions by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The changes' impacts at the national-law level on substantive and procedural family law and on national and personal (party) autonomy are illustrated using reports on the experiences across the EU. The experience of my own Member State, Sweden, is described as an example of how EU-level, increasingly harmonised family law ('international private law' primarily) is being negotiated and implemented both between and within EU Member States. This research aims to overview ongoing (and indeed ever-present) tensions between autonomy and uniformity interests within the EU, contributing to the significant existing literature on the present state of and future possibilities for 'European family law' while also introducing non-EU scholars to this growing, rather complex legal area. As the chapter's final sections describe, a steadily-increasing Europeanisation of family law is observed, co-existing with the tensions, which is reducing legal difficulties for individuals and state actors in Sweden and throughout the EU within a broader context of ongoing legal, economic and cultural globalisation. Family law, no longer taking a back seat to other EU legal areas, is today playing a remarkably prominent role.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Edwardsson, Eva
(författare)
-
Fri rörlighet för välfärd : Rättsutvecklingen gällande den fria rörligheten för sjukvårdstjänster
- 2007
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Enligt EG-rätten skall det råda fri rörlighet för tjänster. Sjuk- och hälsovård är sådana tjänster som omfattas av den fria rörligheten. Om allmän sjukvård i Sverige tidigare har uppfattats mer som en skyldighet för landstingen, har EG-rätten medfört att möjligheten att under vissa förutsättningar få vård i andra EU-länder utgör en rättighet för dem som är bosatta i Sverige.Rättsläget i EG-rätten är idag ganska klart. I fråga om sjukvård eller tand-vård som tillhandahålls utanför sjukhus kan en person som är bosatt i Sverige välja om den vill att vården skall utföras i Sverige eller i ett annat EU- eller EES-land. Förutsättningen är att det rör sig om vård som ges av den allmänna sjukvården i Sverige. Svenska myndigheter får ersätta utländska vårdgivare och patienten betalar endast sådana kostnader som den skulle ha betalat i Sve-rige.För vård på sjukhus har EG-domstolen godkänt att patienter får resa utom-lands för vård endast efter tillstånd från den egna staten eller försäkringskassa. Sådana tillstånd måste dock beviljas om patienten inte kan få vården eller minst lika effektiv vård i tid i den egna medlemsstaten. Sverige har ännu inte infört ett förhandstillståndssystem, men det finns planer på detta. När ett så-dant system införs, ökar myndigheternas möjligheter att avslå begäran om att få vård utomlands. Därmed begränsas svenska patienters möjligheter att söka sig till andra EU-länder. Samtidigt begränsas ovissheten om ersättning kom-mer att medges eller inte. De ekonomiska transaktionerna kring vården utom-lands behöver inte längre skötas av de enskilda patienter som får tillstånd.I den mån vårdens kringkostnader, som kostnad för resa, logi, att patienten behöver stöd av en medföljande etc. ersätts vid vårdresor inom Sverige, gäller i princip att sådana kostnader också skall ersättas när patienten reser utom-lands. Det skall råda likabehandling mellan patienter som får vård inom Sveri-ge och svenska patienter som får vård i andra EU-länder.EG-rätten innebär ett förändringstryck på svensk sjukvård. Vård skall i EU-länderna ges efter behov och inte efter betalningsförmåga. För att alla skall kunna få vård efter behov krävs någon form av kollektiv finansiering. I och med att EG-rätten gör det möjligt för enskilda patienter att ta med sig skatte-pengar utomlands utan att själva behöva betala annat än svenska patientavgif-ter, uppstår ett finansiellt utflöde. Om väldigt många patienter gör bruk av den fria rörligheten, skulle det kunna leda till dåliga finanser för sjukvården. Erfa-renheterna visar att det trots allt är ganska få patienter som verkligen söker vård utomlands. Den svenska sjukvården kan också möta ett eventuellt pati-entutflöde genom att erbjuda effektiv vård i tid i Sverige och förbättra vårdens tillgänglighet.Sammantaget kan inte rättsutvecklingen inom EU sägas utgöra ett hot mot den europeiska sociala modellen.
|
|
| 7. |
- Tanqueray, Laetitia, et al.
(författare)
-
Gender Fairness in Social Robotics : Exploring a Future Care of Peripartum Depression
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction : Alt.HRI - Our Robotics Futures: A Time Capsule - Alt.HRI - Our Robotics Futures: A Time Capsule. - : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). - 9781538685549 ; , s. 598-607, s. 598-607
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this paper we investigate the possibility of socially assistive robots (SARs) supporting diagnostic screening for peripartum depression (PPD) within the next five years. Through a HRI/socio-legal collaboration, we explore the gender norms within PPD in Sweden, to inform a gender-sensitive approach to designing SARs in such a setting, as well as governance implications. This is achieved through conducting expert interviews and qualitatively analysing the data. Based on the results, we conclude that a gender-sensitive approach is a necessity in relation to the design and governance of SARs for PPD screening.
|
|
| 8. |
- Futter, Martyn, et al.
(författare)
-
Forests, Forestry and the Water Framework Directive in Sweden : A Trans-Disciplinary Commentary
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Forests. - : MDPI AG. - 1999-4907. ; 2:1, s. 261-282
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is an ambitious piece of legislation designed to protect and improve water quality throughout Europe. However, forests are only mentioned once in the WFD, and forestry is not mentioned at all, despite its potential implications for streams, rivers and lakes. Here we present a transdisciplinary commentary on the WFD and its implications for forests and forestry in Sweden. This commentary has been prepared by forestry stakeholders, biophysical and social scientists. While we were cognizant of a large body of discipline-specific research, there are very few inter-or trans-disciplinary commentaries which link academic and stakeholder perspectives on the WFD. We had originally felt that there would be little commonality in our concerns. However, we found significant areas of agreement. Our key areas of concern about the implications of the WFD for forestry in Sweden included: (i) concerns about what is meant by good ecological status and how it is assessed; (ii) a perceived lack of clarity in the legal framework; (iii) an inadequate environmental impact assessment process; and (iv) uncertainties about appropriate programs of measures for improving water quality. We were also concerned that ecosystem services provided by forests and the positive effects of forestry on water quality are inadequately recognized in the WFD.
|
|
| 9. |
- Perry, Elizabeth Stuart, 1975-
(författare)
-
Child Support Law in California and Sweden : a Comparison Across Welfare State Models
- 2019
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Ensuring just distribution of and adequate funding for children whose parents do not live together is a global legal challenge. It affects many families as well as every legal jurisdiction’s welfare state and family law.This comparative study describes child support legal solutions in two jurisdictions, California (a liberal welfare state) and Sweden (a social democratic one). Analyzed are the similarities and differences in these states’ legal responses to the inequalities child support law functions to alleviate, and the implications for child support theory and practice in these and other jurisdictions.Micro-comparative chapters demonstrate how the jurisdictions’ regulations differ by analyzing children’s rights and needs and parents’ duties and abilities to pay, each as defined in the child support law. Also compared are procedural laws enforcing child support rights and duties in private and public law cases.Macro-comparative chapters draw a comparative portrait of two welfare state ideological and family law child support approaches, both aiming to reduce inequalities, in terms of how their child support laws and welfare states have defined and addressed the best interests of children and society at large.Most of the differences in the laws and their interpretations are found to reflect the welfare state ideals of the two societies including their ideal models of the family and of individuals’ relationships to the state. Ideals for judicial and negotiated family law conflict resolution also play a significant role.Analyses of the differences include comparison of the jurisdictions’ (1) histories, (2) legal principles and traditions, (3) gender equality ideals and realities and (4) income equality ideals and realities, all as related to legal child support rights and duties.The study provides a better understanding of some of the weaknesses within these regulations, and also of the child support system design choices they represent. Weaknesses in child support laws arise not just from confusions over how to prioritize conflicting interests directly regulated by the legal rules, but also how to prioritize those interests given conflicting ideals of the state and the family, both between and within these societies. Despite the different ideals influencing both systems’ solutions, elements of each jurisdiction’s experience have potential to inform the other’s further development.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
