1. |
|
|
2. |
- Ryrstedt, Eva
(författare)
-
Bokrecension : Av: Asland John, Brattström Margareta, Lind Göran, Lund-Andersen Ingrid, Singer Anna and Sverdrup Tone, Nordic Cohabitation Law, Intersentia, Cambridge, 2015
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Svensk Juristtidning. - 0039-6591. ; :5, s. 559-560
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Ryrstedt, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Dementia and autonomy
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Elder Law : Evolving European Perspectives - Evolving European Perspectives. - 978 1 78536 908 7 ; , s. 358-378
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
5. |
- Ryrstedt, Eva
(författare)
-
Den genetiska utvecklingens familjerättsliga implikationer
- 2003
-
Ingår i: Svensk Juristtidning. - 0039-6591. ; :5/6, s. 554-576
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article is later translated and published in English, partly as the same article, with the title: Ethics, parenthood and human rights: an evaluation of the reactions to the genetic revolution, Hocking, B. & Ryrstedt, E. 2004 Family life and Human Rights: papers presented at the 11th World Conference of the International Society of Family Law. Lødrup, P. & Modvar, E. (eds.). Gyldendal Akademisk, p. 625-656 an rights. That book-chapter is extended.
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
- Ryrstedt, Eva
(författare)
-
Anm. av: Boele-Woelki, Katharina, Ferrand Frédérique, Gonzáles Beilfuss, Cristina, Jänterä-Jareborg, Maarit, Lowe, Nigel, Martiny Dieter, Pintens Walter, Principles of European Family Law, Regarding Divorce and Maintenance Between Former Spouses, Antwerpen-Oxford, 2004, 170 s., samt Principles of European Family Law, regarding Parental Responsibility
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Juridisk Tidskrift. ; :3, s. 748-764
-
Recension (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
9. |
- Ryrstedt, Eva
(författare)
-
Bodelning och bostad: ekonomisk självständighet eller gemenskap
- 1999
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This dissertation gives a description of the regulation of marriage, registered partnership and cohabitation - emphazising the joint dwelling - in the perspective of two basic normative patterns, on one side community and on the other financial independence/individual ownership, trying to explain the differences and similarities between the regulations. The content of the legal regulation is, furthermore, set in relation to the question whether marriage and cohabitation are best characterised as status or contractual relationships. The idea of marriage as a lifelong union for the common good stands in opposition to the view on marriage as a terminable contract. Marriage as a status relationship builds on the idea of community. The basic normative pattern of community stands, however, in conflict with the basic normative pattern of individual ownership and financial independence, which is also at work in the field of family law. The tension between these different normative poles surfaces constantly in the law of marriage, and now even in the law governing registered partnership. The concept of cohabitation - whether heterosexual or homosexual - does not, contrary to marriage, include an expectation that the relationship should be life-long. The idea of a community exists nevertheless also in a cohabitation relationship and conflicts with the pattern of financial indepence and indvidual ownership. As in the case for spouses, the levelling of community property for cohabitees serves several purposes: economic justice, protecion of the weaker party and the ambition to achieve economic equality between men and women.
|
|
10. |
|
|