SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Booleska operatorer måste skrivas med VERSALER

Träfflista för sökning "AMNE:(SOCIAL SCIENCES Business and economics) srt2:(2010-2011);pers:(Carlsson Fredrik 1968);conttype:(refereed)"

Sökning: AMNE:(SOCIAL SCIENCES Business and economics) > (2010-2011) > Carlsson Fredrik 1968 > Refereegranskat

  • Resultat 1-10 av 15
  • [1]2Nästa
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Carlsson, Fredrik, 1968-, et al. (författare)
  • Do you do what you say or do you do what you say others do?
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: Journal of Choice Modelling. - 1755-5345. ; 3:2, s. 113-133
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • We design a donations vs. own money choice experiment and compare the results from three different treatments. In two of the treatments the pay-offs are hypothetical. In the first of these, a short cheap talk script was used and subjects were required to state their own preferences in this scenario. In the second treatment, subjects were asked to state how they believed the average student would respond to the choices. In the third treatment the pay-offs were real, allowing us to use the results to compare the validity of the two hypothetical treatments. Our hypothesis is that when subjects are asked to state how they believe an average person would respond, they will use their own preferences in their responses without using the survey situation for self-enhancement. However, we find a strong hypothetical bias in both hypothetical treatments where the marginal willingness to pay for donations is higher when subjects state their own preferences but lower when subjects state what they believe are other peoples preferences. Our explanation is that subjects use the survey situation to bolster their self-image. We also find that it is mainly women who are prone to hypothetical bias in this study
  •  
2.
  • Carlsson, Fredrik, 1968-, et al. (författare)
  • Value of Statistical Life and Cause of Accident: : A Choice Experiment
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: Risk Analysis. - 0272-4332. ; 30:6, s. 975-986
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The purpose of this study is to compare the value of statistical life (VSL) estimates for traffic, drowning, and fire accidents. Using a choice experiment in a mail survey of 5,000 Swedish respondents we estimated the willingness to pay for risk reductions in the three accidents. In the experiment respondents were asked a series of questions, whether they would choose risk reducing investments where type of accident, cost of the investment, the risk reduction acquired, and the baseline risk varied between questions. The VSLs for fire and drowning accidents were found to be about 1/3 lower than that for traffic accidents. Although respondents worry more about traffic accidents, this alone cannot explain the difference in VSL estimates. The difference between fire and drowning accidents was not found to be statistically significant
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 15
  • [1]2Nästa
 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy