| 1. |
- Brodén, Daniel, 1975, et al.
(författare)
-
Samförfattande som datadriven tvärvetenskap: Pragmatiska lärdomar från SweTerror-projektet
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the Huminfra Conference (HiC 2024), 10-11 January, 2024, Gothenburg, Sweden. - Linköping : Linköping University Electronic Press. - 1650-3686 .- 1650-3740. - 9789180755122
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Terrorism i svensk politik (SweTerror) är ett storskaligt tvärvetenskapligt forskningsprojekt med forskare från såväl human- och samhällsvetenskaperna som datavetenskaperna. Samtidigt använder och utvecklar SweTerror nationell forskningsinfrastruktur för riksdagsdata. Detta paper beskriver användningen av samförfattande som en datadriven tvärvetenskaplig praktik för att integrera olika vetenskapliga perspektiv och skapa samsyn i projektforskningen. Vi tar fasta på betydelsen av valet att koncentrera samarbetsformen kring konferenspapers inom specifikt digital humaniora och diskuterar erfarenheten av att samskrivande försvagar vetenskapligt revirtänkande, liksom ett iterativt förhållningssätt till forskningsdata kopplade till forskningsinfrastrukturer under uppbyggnad. Avslutningsvis betonar vi datadrivet samförfattande som en pragmatisk praktik för att stärka kollaborativt samarbete och kunskapsbryggor inom en tvärvetenskaplig forskargrupp.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ängsal, Magnus Pettersson, 1980
(författare)
-
Deutsch als Fach- und Fremdsprache in Nordeuropa
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Handbuch Deutsch als Fach- und Fremdsprache (eds. Michael Szurawitzki & Patrick Wolf-Farré). - Berlin/Boston : De Gruyter. - 9783110690255 ; , s. 737-752
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Brodén, Daniel, 1975, et al.
(författare)
-
The diachrony of the new political terrorism: Neologisms as discursive framing in Swedish parliamentary data 1971–2018
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Publications. - 2704-1441. ; 5:1, s. 79-89
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper begins to unpack the framing of terrorism in the Swedish Parliament through distant reading and by chronologically extracting neologisms in a comprehensive corpus of transcripts of parliamentary debates. Combining language technology and historical contextualization, we find support for the argument that the term ‘terrorism’ gained much of its modern meaning around 1970. Specifically, our study points to a legislative framing of the issue of terrorism in Swedish parliamentary debate from the early 1970s and onwards. We also find a proliferation in the production of neologisms and compounds after 9/11 2001, reflecting, among other things, the rise of a more distinct counter-terrorism discourse and more ‘specialized’ roles and functions related to terrorism and counter-terrorism activities. The paper concludes by emphasizing the analytical benefits of tracing parliamentary discourse through neologisms as an explorative approach to identify significant patterns for further investigation.
|
|
| 5. |
- Persson, Gunilla Almström, 1959-, et al.
(författare)
-
Språk och politik som forskningsfält
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Sakprosa. - Oslo. - 1891-5108 .- 1502-6000. ; 15:3, s. 1-51
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Ängsal, Magnus Pettersson, 1980
(författare)
-
Striden om historiens relevans. En toposanalys av Sverigedemokraternas partihistoria och vitbok i svenska massmedier under valrörelsen 2022
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Sakprosa. - 1891-5108. ; 15:3, s. 1-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This discourse-analytic study deals with the media coverage of the Sweden Democratic White Paper and the party's history during the 2022 Swedish election campaign. Political language is under scrutiny. Specifically, the analysis divulges how history is used as a topos or source of argument when debating the Sweden Democrats (SD). Empirical data is derived from Swedish national media as accessible in the Media Archive (Retriever), amounting to a total of 138 media sources. Different ways of approaching the party history are distinguished in the media reception of the White Paper. Two basic topos groupsare distinguished. Toposgroup1 contains the notion that history is something already finished and not relevant to the present. Topos group 2 implies that history is alive and relevant to the present. It is suggested that these topos groups, encompassing various sub-topoi,form the basis for different specific arguments concerning SD in the data. Based on the number of hits in the Media Archive, one can conclude that the White Paper itself did not take central stage in those parts of the election campaign that are reflected in the data. Stronger connections were made between SD and the topic of right-wing extremism.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Edlund, Jens, Docent/Associate Professor, 1967-, et al.
(författare)
-
A Multimodal Digital Humanities Study of Terrorism in Swedish Politics: An Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Project on the Configuration of Terrorism in Parliamentary Debates, Legislation, and Policy Networks 1968–2018
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Intelligent Systems and Applications. Proceedings of the 2021 Intelligent Systems Conference, September 2–3, 2021 / Arai K. (eds). - Cham : Springer. - 2367-3370 .- 2367-3389. - 9783030821951 ; , s. 435-449
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper presents the design of one of Sweden’s largest digital humanities projects, SweTerror, that through an interdisciplinary multi-modal methodological approach develops an extensive speech-to-text digital HSS resource. SweTerror makes a major contribution to the study of terrorism in Sweden through a comprehensive mixed methods study of the political discourse on terrorism since the late 1960s. Drawing on artificial intelligence in the form of state-of-the-art language and speech technology, it systematically analyses all forms of relevant parliamentary utterances. It explores and curates an exhaustive but understudied multi-modal collection of primary sources of central relevance to Swedish democracy: the audio recordings of the Swedish Parliament’s debates. The project studies the framing of terrorism both as policy discourse and enacted politics, examining semantic and emotive components of the parliamentary discourse on terrorism as well as major actors and social networks involved. It covers political responses to a range of terrorism-related issues as well as factors influencing policy-makers’ engagement, including political affiliations and gender. SweTerror also develops an online research portal, featuring the complete research material and searchable audio made readily accessible for further exploration. Long-term, the project establishes a model for combining extraction technologies (speech recognition and analysis) for audiovisual parliamentary data with text mining and HSS interpretive methods and the portal is designed to serve as a prototype for other similar projects.
|
|
